From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: ignore non-maintainer tags
Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 21:48:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE46E7D.1040906@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100507070218.GA6574@home.mickler.org>
Florian Mickler wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 11:39:26PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 08:34 +0200, florian@mickler.org wrote:
>>> Using --git to determine who to send a patch to, it is not
>>> reasonable to include people that only reported an issue or tested a
>>> patch.
>> I think this is a questionable assumption.
>>
>> People that test or otherwise sign a patch are also good
>> candidates to review new patches.
>>
>> cheers, Joe
>
> Our views differ then.
>
> It is unreasonable to assume, that someone who is listed via
> Tested-By: in a random patch is able to review another patch to the same
> file. More likely will he be annoyed, because he see's a patch, dig's
> in and then thinks: "wtf? why were i cc'ed on this. I don't know this
> code. I don't have time for this!"
>
> Thats just broken.
Indeed. Three points:
- Reported-by: and Tested-by: signed commits were most likely about
something radically different from what the new patch submission is
about.
- get_maintainer.pl is supposed to list maintainer addresses.
Reporters and testers are not maintainers.
- If a get_maintainer.pl user expects to get not only maintainer
addresses but also addresses of potential reviewers, then he shall
use the mailinglist addresses for that.
People who /want/ to review patches subscribe to that mailinglist
or register themselves in MAINTAINERS.
Pushing patches to people of whom it is unknown whether they want or can
review the patches may actually be rude. If it can be avoided that
get_maintainer.pl lists addresses of people who are likely of that
category, then please teach it to.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- -=-= --===
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-07 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-06 1:57 [PATCH] epoll: use wrapper functions Changli Gao
2010-05-06 6:00 ` indiscriminate get_maintainer.pl usage (was [PATCH] epoll: use wrapper functions) Stefan Richter
[not found] ` <s2t412e6f7f1005052319sdbf3fdfbg256d11b983c4f304@mail.gmail.com>
2010-05-06 6:40 ` indiscriminate get_maintainer.pl usage Stefan Richter
2010-05-06 15:42 ` Davide Libenzi
2010-05-06 16:52 ` Joe Perches
2010-05-06 17:59 ` Davide Libenzi
2010-05-06 20:52 ` Joe Perches
2010-05-07 6:34 ` [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: ignore non-maintainer tags florian
2010-05-07 6:39 ` Joe Perches
2010-05-07 7:02 ` Florian Mickler
2010-05-07 19:48 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2010-05-08 21:32 ` [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: optionally " florian
2010-05-08 21:39 ` [PATCH] [RFC] get_maintainer.pl: only list maintainers by default florian
2010-05-08 22:44 ` Joe Perches
2010-05-08 23:23 ` Stefan Richter
2010-05-08 23:51 ` Joe Perches
2010-05-09 0:22 ` Stefan Richter
2010-05-09 0:57 ` Joe Perches
2010-05-09 8:18 ` Stefan Richter
2010-05-09 8:41 ` Stefan Richter
2010-05-09 8:49 ` Florian Mickler
2010-05-09 9:12 ` Stefan Richter
2010-05-09 8:40 ` Florian Mickler
2010-05-08 22:06 ` [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: optionally ignore non-maintainer tags Joe Perches
2010-05-09 9:15 ` [PATCH v2] " florian
2010-05-09 9:35 ` Stefan Richter
2010-05-10 4:56 ` [PATCH 0/2] scripts/get_maintainer.pl: trivial improvements Joe Perches
2010-05-10 4:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] scripts/get_maintainer.pl: optionally ignore non-maintainer signatures Joe Perches
2010-05-10 5:07 ` Florian Mickler
2010-05-11 6:36 ` [PATCH] scripts/get_maintainer.pl: default to not include unspecified tags florian
2010-05-11 7:48 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-11 15:59 ` Joe Perches
2010-05-11 16:33 ` Florian Mickler
2010-05-11 16:40 ` Joe Perches
2010-05-10 4:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] scripts/get_maintainer.pl: add .get_maintainer.conf default options file Joe Perches
2010-05-12 6:30 ` Américo Wang
2010-05-12 9:25 ` Florian Mickler
2010-05-13 15:58 ` Américo Wang
2010-05-13 16:22 ` Joe Perches
2010-05-08 22:26 ` [PATCH] " Joe Perches
2010-05-09 9:12 ` Florian Mickler
2010-05-06 20:13 ` indiscriminate get_maintainer.pl usage Roland Dreier
2010-05-06 18:47 ` [PATCH] epoll: use wrapper functions Davide Libenzi
2010-05-06 18:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-07 2:48 ` Changli Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE46E7D.1040906@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=florian@mickler.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®