From: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
esandeen@redhat.com, jmoyer@redhat.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clear PageError bit in msync & fsync
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:07:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101109210715.GJ3099@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CD9A209.6070807@redhat.com>
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 02:33:29PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> There are essentially two possibilities:
> 1) the VM can potentially be filled up with uncleanable dirty pages, or
> 2) pages that hit an IO error are left in a clean state, so they can
> be reclaimed under memory pressure
>
> Alternative 1 could cause the entire system to deadlock, while
> option 2 puts the onus on userland apps to rewrite the data
> from a failed msync/fsync.
>
> Currently the VM has behaviour #2 which is preserved with my
> patch.
>
> The only difference with my patch is, we won't keep returning
> -EIO on subsequent, error free, msync or fsync calls to files
> that had an IO error at some previous point in the past.
Do we guarantee that the application will get EIO at least once? I
thought there were issues where the error bit could get lost if the
page writeback was triggered by sync() run by a third-party
application.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-09 16:44 Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 18:09 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-11-09 19:21 ` Jeff Layton
2010-11-09 19:33 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 21:07 ` Ted Ts'o [this message]
2010-11-09 21:15 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 21:41 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-12 4:36 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-12 15:52 ` Jeff Layton
2010-11-12 17:04 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 21:44 ` Jan Kara
2010-11-11 16:31 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 21:21 ` Zan Lynx
2010-11-09 21:24 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-12 20:51 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-12 21:36 ` Jeff Layton
2010-11-09 21:39 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101109210715.GJ3099@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome