mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	esandeen@redhat.com, jmoyer@redhat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clear PageError bit in msync & fsync
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:07:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101109210715.GJ3099@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CD9A209.6070807@redhat.com>

On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 02:33:29PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> 
> There are essentially two possibilities:
> 1) the VM can potentially be filled up with uncleanable dirty pages, or
> 2) pages that hit an IO error are left in a clean state, so they can
>    be reclaimed under memory pressure
> 
> Alternative 1 could cause the entire system to deadlock, while
> option 2 puts the onus on userland apps to rewrite the data
> from a failed msync/fsync.
> 
> Currently the VM has behaviour #2 which is preserved with my
> patch.
> 
> The only difference with my patch is, we won't keep returning
> -EIO on subsequent, error free, msync or fsync calls to files
> that had an IO error at some previous point in the past.

Do we guarantee that the application will get EIO at least once?  I
thought there were issues where the error bit could get lost if the
page writeback was triggered by sync() run by a third-party
application.


     	       	   	     		- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-09 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-09 16:44 Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 18:09 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-11-09 19:21 ` Jeff Layton
2010-11-09 19:33   ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 21:07     ` Ted Ts'o [this message]
2010-11-09 21:15       ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 21:41         ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-12  4:36           ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-12 15:52             ` Jeff Layton
2010-11-12 17:04               ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 21:44         ` Jan Kara
2010-11-11 16:31       ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 21:21     ` Zan Lynx
2010-11-09 21:24       ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-12 20:51         ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-12 21:36           ` Jeff Layton
2010-11-09 21:39 ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101109210715.GJ3099@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome