From: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Zan Lynx <zlynx@acm.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
jmoyer@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clear PageError bit in msync & fsync
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:51:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDDA8E7.2090003@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CD9BBF9.8020600@redhat.com>
On 11/09/2010 03:24 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 11/09/2010 04:21 PM, Zan Lynx wrote:
>> On 11/9/10 12:33 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>> On 11/09/2010 02:21 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
>>>
>>>> This does leave the page in sort of a funky state. The uptodate bit
>>>> will still probably be set, but the dirty bit won't be. The page will
>>>> be effectively "disconnected" from the backing store until someone
>>>> writes to it.
>>>>
>>>> I suppose though that this is the best that can reasonably be done in
>>>> this situation however...
>>>
>>> I spent a few days looking for alternatives, and indeed I found
>>> nothing better...
>>
>> Just an off the top of my head crazy idea...
>>
>> Could you leave the error bit set on the page and treat it as a dirty
>> bit during a future msync, clearing the error bit at that point.
>>
>> The general idea would be to leave the error set unless an explicit
>> write was requested.
>
> The problem with that is that the page will be unreclaimable,
> and the VM could get filled with PageError pages and be unable
> to make further progress (if the IO path does not come back).
As a further crazy idea ;) what if it only persisted for "X" write
attempts? Maybe (sigh) a tunable?
That way several fsyncs get the chance to see it, but eventually
enough writebacks will go off to give up and clear it. Hacky,
but an idea ...
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-12 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-09 16:44 Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 18:09 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-11-09 19:21 ` Jeff Layton
2010-11-09 19:33 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 21:07 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-09 21:15 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 21:41 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-12 4:36 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-12 15:52 ` Jeff Layton
2010-11-12 17:04 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 21:44 ` Jan Kara
2010-11-11 16:31 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 21:21 ` Zan Lynx
2010-11-09 21:24 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-12 20:51 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-11-12 21:36 ` Jeff Layton
2010-11-09 21:39 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CDDA8E7.2090003@redhat.com \
--to=esandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=zlynx@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome