From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, security@kernel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: disable hibernation if module loading is disabled
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 00:10:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110304211035.GA28842@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201103042142.09247.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 21:42 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> That "everyone" is actually the "full root" (in the case of /sys/power/state)
> or someone having CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the /dev/snapshot case, right?
Yes, sorry for my bad english. "Everyone" is indeed misleading :-D
> Second, there's _zero_ relationship between /proc/sys/kernel/modules_disabled
> and the hibernation interface, so please find a different way to solve the
> problem (if there is any).
If modules_disabled is set to 1, then nobody, even full root may not write
to the kernel, right? So, if something permits to indirectly pass
modules_disabled restriction, this is a bug. Otherwise,
modules_disabled is confusing as it gives false sense of security.
-OR-
modules_disabled's documentation should be changed to note that it
doesn't prevent rootkit uploading, but only forbids modprob'ing modules
via the "official" init_module(2) gate, disallowing e.g. module autoloading.
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-04 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-04 16:11 Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-04 18:43 ` Kees Cook
2011-03-04 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-04 20:32 ` Pavel Machek
2011-03-04 21:52 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-04 20:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-04 21:10 ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2011-03-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-04 21:46 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-04 22:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-04 22:42 ` Pavel Machek
2011-03-05 10:34 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-05 11:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-08 6:58 ` Pavel Machek
2011-03-04 21:27 ` [Security] " Greg KH
2011-03-04 21:51 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-06 19:36 ` david
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110304211035.GA28842@albatros \
--to=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®