From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>
Cc: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, security@kernel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: disable hibernation if module loading is disabled
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:48:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201103042148.39944.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110304184324.GQ372@outflux.net>
On Friday, March 04, 2011, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 07:11:24PM +0300, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > If /proc/sys/kernel/modules_disabled is set to 1, then nobody (even full
> > root) may not read/write arbitrary kernel memory. In spite of it,
> > hibernation allows anyone with an access to either /dev/snapshot or
> > /sys/power/ make the full snapshot of the system. This snapshot may be
> > freely changed and uploaded back.
>
> Ah, yes please. I'd like to try to have ways to close all the
> "intentional" arbitrary memory writing interfaces.
They are not exactly arbitrary and I'd like to see a plausible attack
scenario using the hibernation interface as is (assuming you're not a
full root at least).
> Hooking it to modules_disable seems as good as any other toggle.
You're kidding, aren't you?
> Still waiting to hear
> anything on this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/49471
I personally don't think it's a good idea, but I'm not the maintainer of that
code.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-04 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-04 16:11 Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-04 18:43 ` Kees Cook
2011-03-04 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-03-04 20:32 ` Pavel Machek
2011-03-04 21:52 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-04 20:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-04 21:10 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-04 21:46 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-04 22:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-04 22:42 ` Pavel Machek
2011-03-05 10:34 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-05 11:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-08 6:58 ` Pavel Machek
2011-03-04 21:27 ` [Security] " Greg KH
2011-03-04 21:51 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-06 19:36 ` david
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201103042148.39944.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=kees.cook@canonical.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®