From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
x86@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>,
George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf, nmi: Move LVT un-masking into irq handlers
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:50:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110425145004.GG31724@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DB581FD.8080006@gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 06:15:25PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
> Don't get me wrong please but the whole picture of what is happening can be seen only when
> all caller sequence is taken into account and once (for some reason) the sequence
> get changed the "detailed" comment would simply mess the comment reader so I think
> the former comment is detailed enough and what is more important it's "general" enough
> so it doesn't depend on when code is called but points a reader on hw details and it's
> up to a reader to check "current" calling sequence because kernel code changes too
> damn fast ;)
I think Ingo is looking for is something like
/*
* It has been observed that quirks in the P4 perf hw has forced the
* following sequence of events to happen in the order below
*
* - clear the OVF bit (as it will continue to assert the NMI line)
* - unmask the apic LVTPC bit to allow NMIs from the PMU again
* - optionally re-enable the PMU to count events again
*
* Un-masking the apic prematurely (before clearing the OVF bit) has led
* to the creation of a second NMI event (which led to the unknown NMI
* warnings) due to the fact that the PMU will continue to generate an
* interrupt until its OVF bit is cleared.
*/
Something that specifically documents what we saw, why we saw it and what
we are doing to avoid it.
Cheers,
Don
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-25 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-21 15:03 [PATCH 0/4] perf, x86: collection of pentium 4 fixes Don Zickus
2011-04-21 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf, x86: P4 PMU -- Use perf_sample_data_init helper Don Zickus
2011-04-22 8:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-22 8:35 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-04-22 12:18 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-04-21 15:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf, x86: P4 PMU - Don't forget to clear cpuc->active_mask on overflow Don Zickus
2011-04-22 12:19 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-04-21 15:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf, nmi: Move LVT un-masking into irq handlers Don Zickus
2011-04-22 8:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-25 13:39 ` Don Zickus
2011-04-25 14:15 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
[not found] ` <BANLkTi=t7bZ0sFRvUt=a=_54fhXtccPYnQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-04-25 14:28 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-04-25 14:50 ` Don Zickus [this message]
2011-04-25 14:51 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-04-21 15:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf, x86: Add PERF_COUNT_HW_NMI_WATCHDOG event Don Zickus
2011-04-22 8:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-22 8:43 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-04-22 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-22 9:24 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-04-22 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-22 10:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-04-22 15:15 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-04-25 13:41 ` Don Zickus
2011-04-25 14:05 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110425145004.GG31724@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome