* [PATCH] [S390] do not clobber personality flags in sys_32_personality()
@ 2012-08-01 18:48 Jiri Kosina
2012-08-02 7:11 ` [PATCH v2] " Jiri Kosina
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Kosina @ 2012-08-01 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Schwidefsky, Heiko Carstens; +Cc: linux390, linux-s390, linux-kernel
There are multiple errors in how sys_32_personality() handles personality
flags stored in top three bytes.
- directly comparing current->personality against PER_LINUX32 doesn't work
in cases when any of the personality flags stored in the top three bytes
are used.
- directly forcefully setting personality to PER_LINUX32 or PER_LINUX
discards any flags stored in the top three bytes
Fix the first one by properly using personality() macro to compare only
bytes covered by PER_MASK.
Fix the second one by setting only the bits that should be set, instead of
overwriting the whole value.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
---
arch/s390/kernel/sys_s390.c | 9 +++++----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/sys_s390.c b/arch/s390/kernel/sys_s390.c
index b4a29ee..6afcfd9 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/sys_s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/sys_s390.c
@@ -81,11 +81,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(s390_personality, unsigned int, personality)
{
unsigned int ret;
- if (current->personality == PER_LINUX32 && personality == PER_LINUX)
- personality = PER_LINUX32;
+ if (personality(current->personality) == PER_LINUX32 &&
+ personality(personality) == PER_LINUX)
+ personality &= ~PER_LINUX | PER_LINUX32;
ret = sys_personality(personality);
- if (ret == PER_LINUX32)
- ret = PER_LINUX;
+ if (personality(ret) == PER_LINUX32)
+ ret &= ~PER_LINUX32 | PER_LINUX;
return ret;
}
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2] [S390] do not clobber personality flags in sys_32_personality()
2012-08-01 18:48 [PATCH] [S390] do not clobber personality flags in sys_32_personality() Jiri Kosina
@ 2012-08-02 7:11 ` Jiri Kosina
2012-08-02 12:41 ` Heiko Carstens
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Kosina @ 2012-08-02 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Schwidefsky, Heiko Carstens; +Cc: linux390, linux-s390, linux-kernel
There are multiple errors in how sys_32_personality() handles personality
flags stored in top three bytes.
- directly comparing current->personality against PER_LINUX32 doesn't work
in cases when any of the personality flags stored in the top three bytes
are used.
- directly forcefully setting personality to PER_LINUX32 or PER_LINUX
discards any flags stored in the top three bytes
Fix the first one by properly using personality() macro to compare only
PER_MASK bytes.
Fix the second one by setting only the bits that should be set, instead of
overwriting the whole value.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
---
changed since v1: fix the bit ops to reflect the fact that PER_LINUX is
actually 0
arch/s390/kernel/sys_s390.c | 9 +++++----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/sys_s390.c b/arch/s390/kernel/sys_s390.c
index b4a29ee..d0964d2 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/sys_s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/sys_s390.c
@@ -81,11 +81,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(s390_personality, unsigned int, personality)
{
unsigned int ret;
- if (current->personality == PER_LINUX32 && personality == PER_LINUX)
- personality = PER_LINUX32;
+ if (personality(current->personality) == PER_LINUX32 &&
+ personality(personality) == PER_LINUX)
+ personality |= PER_LINUX32;
ret = sys_personality(personality);
- if (ret == PER_LINUX32)
- ret = PER_LINUX;
+ if (personality(ret) == PER_LINUX32)
+ ret &= ~PER_LINUX32;
return ret;
}
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] [S390] do not clobber personality flags in sys_32_personality()
2012-08-02 7:11 ` [PATCH v2] " Jiri Kosina
@ 2012-08-02 12:41 ` Heiko Carstens
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Carstens @ 2012-08-02 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Kosina; +Cc: Martin Schwidefsky, linux390, linux-s390, linux-kernel
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:11:23AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> There are multiple errors in how sys_32_personality() handles personality
> flags stored in top three bytes.
>
> - directly comparing current->personality against PER_LINUX32 doesn't work
> in cases when any of the personality flags stored in the top three bytes
> are used.
> - directly forcefully setting personality to PER_LINUX32 or PER_LINUX
> discards any flags stored in the top three bytes
>
> Fix the first one by properly using personality() macro to compare only
> PER_MASK bytes.
> Fix the second one by setting only the bits that should be set, instead of
> overwriting the whole value.
Applied. Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-02 12:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-01 18:48 [PATCH] [S390] do not clobber personality flags in sys_32_personality() Jiri Kosina
2012-08-02 7:11 ` [PATCH v2] " Jiri Kosina
2012-08-02 12:41 ` Heiko Carstens
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®