From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64, asm: Work around AMD SYSRET SS descriptor attribute issue
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 23:12:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150425211206.GE32099@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d120f358612d73fc909f5bfa47e7bd082db0af0.1429841474.git.luto@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 07:15:01PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> AMD CPUs don't reinitialize the SS descriptor on SYSRET, so SYSRET
> with SS == 0 results in an invalid usermode state in which SS is
> apparently equal to __USER_DS but causes #SS if used.
>
> Work around the issue by replacing NULL SS values with __KERNEL_DS
> in __switch_to, thus ensuring that SYSRET never happens with SS set
> to NULL.
>
> This was exposed by a recent vDSO cleanup.
>
> Fixes: e7d6eefaaa44 x86/vdso32/syscall.S: Do not load __USER32_DS to %ss
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> ---
>
> Tested only on Intel, which isn't very interesting. I'll tidy up
> and send a test case, too, once Borislav confirms that it works.
So I did some benchmarking today. Custom kernel build measured with perf
stat, 10 builds with --pre doing
$ cat pre-build-kernel.sh
make -s clean
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
$ cat measure.sh
EVENTS="cpu-clock,task-clock,cycles,instructions,branches,branch-misses,context-switches,migrations"
perf stat -e $EVENTS --sync -a --repeat 10 --pre ~/kernel/pre-build-kernel.sh make -s -j64
I've prepended the perf stat output with markers A:, B: or C: for easier
comparing. The markers mean:
A: Linus' master from a couple of days ago + tip/master + tip/x86/asm
B: With Andy's SYSRET patch ontop
C: Without RCX canonicalness check (see patch at the end).
Numbers are from an AMD F16h box:
A: 2835570.145246 cpu-clock (msec) ( +- 0.02% ) [100.00%]
B: 2833364.074970 cpu-clock (msec) ( +- 0.04% ) [100.00%]
C: 2834708.335431 cpu-clock (msec) ( +- 0.02% ) [100.00%]
This is interesting - The SYSRET SS fix makes it minimally better and
the C-patch is a bit worse again. Net win is 861 msec, almost a second,
oh well.
A: 2835570.099981 task-clock (msec) # 3.996 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.02% ) [100.00%]
B: 2833364.073633 task-clock (msec) # 3.996 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.04% ) [100.00%]
C: 2834708.350387 task-clock (msec) # 3.996 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.02% ) [100.00%]
Similar thing observable here.
A: 5,591,213,166,613 cycles # 1.972 GHz ( +- 0.03% ) [75.00%]
B: 5,585,023,802,888 cycles # 1.971 GHz ( +- 0.03% ) [75.00%]
C: 5,587,983,212,758 cycles # 1.971 GHz ( +- 0.02% ) [75.00%]
net win is 3,229,953,855 cycles drop.
A: 3,106,707,101,530 instructions # 0.56 insns per cycle ( +- 0.01% ) [75.00%]
B: 3,106,632,251,528 instructions # 0.56 insns per cycle ( +- 0.00% ) [75.00%]
C: 3,106,265,958,142 instructions # 0.56 insns per cycle ( +- 0.00% ) [75.00%]
This looks like it would make sense - instruction count drops from A -> B -> C.
A: 683,676,044,429 branches # 241.107 M/sec ( +- 0.01% ) [75.00%]
B: 683,670,899,595 branches # 241.293 M/sec ( +- 0.01% ) [75.00%]
C: 683,675,772,858 branches # 241.180 M/sec ( +- 0.01% ) [75.00%]
Also makes sense - the C patch adds an unconditional JMP over the
RCX-canonicalness check.
A: 43,829,535,008 branch-misses # 6.41% of all branches ( +- 0.02% ) [75.00%]
B: 43,844,118,416 branch-misses # 6.41% of all branches ( +- 0.03% ) [75.00%]
C: 43,819,871,086 branch-misses # 6.41% of all branches ( +- 0.02% ) [75.00%]
And this is nice, branch misses are the smallest with C, cool. It makes
sense again - the C patch adds an unconditional JMP which doesn't miss.
A: 2,030,357 context-switches # 0.716 K/sec ( +- 0.06% ) [100.00%]
B: 2,029,313 context-switches # 0.716 K/sec ( +- 0.05% ) [100.00%]
C: 2,028,566 context-switches # 0.716 K/sec ( +- 0.06% ) [100.00%]
Those look good.
A: 52,421 migrations # 0.018 K/sec ( +- 1.13% )
B: 52,049 migrations # 0.018 K/sec ( +- 1.02% )
C: 51,365 migrations # 0.018 K/sec ( +- 0.92% )
Same here.
A: 709.528485252 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.02% )
B: 708.976557288 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.04% )
C: 709.312844791 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.02% )
Interestingly, the unconditional JMP kinda costs... Btw, I'm not sure if
kernel build is the optimal workload for benchmarking here but I don't
see why not - it does a lot of syscalls so it should exercise the SYSRET
path sufficiently.
Anyway, we can do this below. Or not, I'm sitting on the fence about
that one.
---
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 19:30:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86/entry: Avoid canonical RCX check on AMD
It is not needed on AMD as RCX canonicalness is not checked during
SYSRET there.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 2 ++
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 13 +++++++++----
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 7ee9b94d9921..8d555b046fe9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -265,6 +265,7 @@
#define X86_BUG_11AP X86_BUG(5) /* Bad local APIC aka 11AP */
#define X86_BUG_FXSAVE_LEAK X86_BUG(6) /* FXSAVE leaks FOP/FIP/FOP */
#define X86_BUG_CLFLUSH_MONITOR X86_BUG(7) /* AAI65, CLFLUSH required before MONITOR */
+#define X86_BUG_CANONICAL_RCX X86_BUG(8) /* SYSRET #GPs when %RCX non-canonical */
#if defined(__KERNEL__) && !defined(__ASSEMBLY__)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 50163fa9034f..109a51815e92 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -159,6 +159,8 @@ static void early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
pr_info("Disabling PGE capability bit\n");
setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_PGE);
}
+
+ set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_CANONICAL_RCX);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
index e952f6bf1d6d..d01fb6c1362f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -415,16 +415,20 @@ syscall_return:
jne opportunistic_sysret_failed
/*
- * On Intel CPUs, SYSRET with non-canonical RCX/RIP will #GP
- * in kernel space. This essentially lets the user take over
- * the kernel, since userspace controls RSP.
- *
* If width of "canonical tail" ever becomes variable, this will need
* to be updated to remain correct on both old and new CPUs.
*/
.ifne __VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT - 47
.error "virtual address width changed -- SYSRET checks need update"
.endif
+
+ /*
+ * On Intel CPUs, SYSRET with non-canonical RCX/RIP will #GP
+ * in kernel space. This essentially lets the user take over
+ * the kernel, since userspace controls RSP.
+ */
+ ALTERNATIVE "jmp 1f", "", X86_BUG_CANONICAL_RCX
+
/* Change top 16 bits to be the sign-extension of 47th bit */
shl $(64 - (__VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT+1)), %rcx
sar $(64 - (__VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT+1)), %rcx
@@ -432,6 +436,7 @@ syscall_return:
cmpq %rcx, %r11
jne opportunistic_sysret_failed
+1:
cmpq $__USER_CS,CS(%rsp) /* CS must match SYSRET */
jne opportunistic_sysret_failed
--
2.3.5
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-25 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-24 2:15 Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-24 2:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-26 12:34 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-24 3:58 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-24 9:59 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-24 10:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-24 19:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-24 11:27 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-24 12:00 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-24 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-24 17:33 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-24 17:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-24 17:57 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-24 20:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-24 20:46 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-24 20:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-24 21:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-24 21:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-24 21:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-24 21:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-24 21:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-24 21:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-25 2:17 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-26 23:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-24 20:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-25 21:12 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2015-04-26 11:22 ` perf numbers (was: Re: [PATCH] x86_64, asm: Work around AMD SYSRET SS descriptor attribute issue) Borislav Petkov
2015-04-26 23:39 ` [PATCH] x86_64, asm: Work around AMD SYSRET SS descriptor attribute issue Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-27 8:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 10:07 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-27 10:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 11:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 12:08 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-27 12:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 14:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 15:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 15:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 15:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 15:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-27 16:04 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-27 16:10 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-27 16:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 16:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 18:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 18:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 18:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 19:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-27 20:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 20:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-28 15:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-28 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-28 16:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-28 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-28 18:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-30 21:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-30 23:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-05-01 9:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-03 11:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 19:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 19:21 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-27 19:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-28 13:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 16:12 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-27 18:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 18:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 14:39 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150425211206.GE32099@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome