mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64, asm: Work around AMD SYSRET SS descriptor attribute issue
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 15:40:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150428134012.GC19025@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150427194512.GK28871@pd.tnic>

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:45:12PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Maybe you are measuring random noise.
> 
> Yeah. Last exercise tomorrow. Let's see what those numbers would look
> like.

Right, so with Mel's help, I did a simple microbenchmark to measure how
many cycles a syscall (getpid()) needs on 4.1-rc1 and with your patch.

4.1-rc1
-------
Running 60 times, 10000000 loops per run.
Cycles: 3977233027, cycles/syscall: 397.723303
Cycles: 3964979519, cycles/syscall: 396.497952
Cycles: 3962470261, cycles/syscall: 396.247026
Cycles: 3963524693, cycles/syscall: 396.352469
Cycles: 3962853704, cycles/syscall: 396.285370
Cycles: 3964603727, cycles/syscall: 396.460373
Cycles: 3964758926, cycles/syscall: 396.475893
Cycles: 3965268019, cycles/syscall: 396.526802
Cycles: 3962198683, cycles/syscall: 396.219868
...


4.1-rc1 + 17be0aec74fb036eb4eb32c2268f3420a034762b from tip
-----------------------------------------------------------
Running 60 times, 10000000 loops per run.
Cycles: 3973575441, cycles/syscall: 397.357544
Cycles: 3963999393, cycles/syscall: 396.399939
Cycles: 3962613575, cycles/syscall: 396.261357
Cycles: 3963440408, cycles/syscall: 396.344041
Cycles: 3963475255, cycles/syscall: 396.347526
Cycles: 3964471785, cycles/syscall: 396.447179
Cycles: 3962890513, cycles/syscall: 396.289051
Cycles: 3964940114, cycles/syscall: 396.494011
Cycles: 3964186426, cycles/syscall: 396.418643
...

So yeah, your patch is fine - provided I've done everything right. Here's
the microbenchmark:

---
/*
 * How to run:
 *
 * taskset -c <cpunum> ./sys
 */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>

typedef unsigned long long u64;

#define DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high)    unsigned low, high
#define EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high)     ((low) | ((u64)(high) << 32))
#define EAX_EDX_ARGS(val, low, high)    "a" (low), "d" (high)
#define EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high)     "=a" (low), "=d" (high)

static __always_inline unsigned long long rdtsc(void)
{
        DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high);

        asm volatile("rdtsc" : EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high));

        return EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high);
}

static long my_getpid(void)
{
  long ret;
  asm volatile ("syscall" :
		"=a" (ret) :
		"a" (SYS_getpid) :
		"memory", "cc", "rcx", "r11");
  return ret;
}

static inline u64 read_tsc(void)
{
	u64 ret;

	asm volatile("mfence");
	ret = rdtsc();
	asm volatile("mfence");

	return ret;
}


int main()
{
	int i, j;
	u64 p1, p2;
	u64 count = 0;

#define TIMES 60
#define LOOPS 10000000ULL

	printf("Running %d times, %lld loops per run.\n", TIMES, LOOPS);

	for (j = 0; j < TIMES; j++) {
		for (i = 0; i < LOOPS; i++) {
			p1 = read_tsc();
			my_getpid();
			p2 = read_tsc();

			count += (p2 - p1);
		}

		printf("Cycles: %lld, cycles/syscall: %f\n",
			count, (double)count / LOOPS);

		count = 0;
	}

	return 0;
}

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-28 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-24  2:15 Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-24  2:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-26 12:34   ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-24  3:58 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-24  9:59 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-24 10:59   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-24 19:58     ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-24 11:27 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-24 12:00   ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-24 16:25     ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-24 17:33       ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-24 17:41         ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-24 17:57           ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-24 20:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-24 20:46   ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-24 20:50     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-24 21:45       ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-24 21:45       ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-24 21:45       ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-24 21:45       ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-24 21:45       ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-24 21:45       ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-25  2:17       ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-26 23:36         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-24 20:53   ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-25 21:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-26 11:22   ` perf numbers (was: Re: [PATCH] x86_64, asm: Work around AMD SYSRET SS descriptor attribute issue) Borislav Petkov
2015-04-26 23:39   ` [PATCH] x86_64, asm: Work around AMD SYSRET SS descriptor attribute issue Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-27  8:53     ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 10:07       ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-27 10:09         ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 11:35       ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 12:08         ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-27 12:48           ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 14:57         ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 15:06           ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 15:35             ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 15:46           ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 15:56             ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-27 16:04               ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-27 16:10                 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-27 16:00             ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 16:40               ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 18:14                 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 18:38                   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 18:47                     ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 18:53                       ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 19:59                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-27 20:03                           ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 20:14                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-28 15:55                               ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-28 16:28                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-28 16:58                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-28 17:16                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-28 18:38                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-30 21:39                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-30 23:23                                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-05-01  9:03                                             ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-03 11:51                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 19:11                     ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 19:21                       ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-27 19:45                         ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-28 13:40                           ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2015-04-27 16:12           ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-27 18:12             ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 18:47               ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 14:39     ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150428134012.GC19025@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome