From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64, asm: Work around AMD SYSRET SS descriptor attribute issue
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:39:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5542A0FB.50707@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150428183820.GJ19025@pd.tnic>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
This is the microbenchmark I used.
For the record, Intel's intention going forward is that 0F 1F will
always be as fast or faster than any other alternative.
-hpa
[-- Attachment #2: nopltest.c --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2429 bytes --]
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
static void nop_p6(void)
{
asm volatile(".rept 1000\n"
".byte 0x0f,0x1f,0x44,0x00,0x00\n"
".endr");
}
static void nop_k8(void)
{
asm volatile(".rept 1000\n"
".byte 0x66,0x66,0x66,0x66,0x90\n"
".endr");
}
static void nop_lea(void)
{
#ifdef __x86_64__
asm volatile(".rept 1000\n"
".byte 0x48,0x8d,0x74,0x26,0x00\n"
".endr");
#else
asm volatile(".rept 1000\n"
".byte 0x3e,0x8d,0x74,0x26,0x00\n"
".endr");
#endif
}
static void nop_jmp5(void)
{
asm volatile(".rept 1000\n"
".byte 0xe9,0,0,0,0\n"
".endr");
}
static void nop_jmp2(void)
{
asm volatile(".rept 1000\n"
".byte 0xeb,3,0x90,0x90,0x90\n"
".endr");
}
static void nop_xchg(void)
{
asm volatile(".rept 1000\n"
".byte 0x66,0x66,0x66,0x87,0xc0\n"
".endr");
}
static void nop_mov(void)
{
asm volatile(".rept 1000\n"
".byte 0x66,0x66,0x66,0x89,0xc0\n"
".endr");
}
static void nop_fdisi(void)
{
asm volatile(".rept 1000\n"
".byte 0x66,0x66,0x66,0xdb,0xe1\n"
".endr");
}
static void nop_feni(void)
{
asm volatile(".rept 1000\n"
".byte 0x66,0x66,0x66,0xdb,0xe0\n"
".endr");
}
struct test_list {
const char *name;
void (*func)(void);
};
static const struct test_list tests[] = {
{ "P6 NOPs (NOPL)", nop_p6 },
{ "K8 NOPs (66 90)", nop_k8 },
{ "LEA", nop_lea },
{ "XCHG", nop_xchg },
{ "MOV", nop_mov },
{ "FDISI", nop_fdisi },
{ "FENI", nop_feni },
{ "E9 JMP", nop_jmp5 },
{ "EB JMP", nop_jmp2 },
{ NULL, NULL }
};
static void benchmark(const struct test_list *test, bool warmup)
{
struct timeval tv0, tv1;
int i;
const int reps = 100000;
unsigned long long us;
gettimeofday(&tv0, NULL);
for (i = 0; i < reps; i++)
test->func();
gettimeofday(&tv1, NULL);
us = (tv1.tv_sec - tv0.tv_sec) * 1000000ULL +
((int)tv1.tv_usec - (int)tv0.tv_usec);
if (!warmup)
printf("%s: %d repetitions at %llu us\n", test->name, reps, us);
}
int main(void)
{
const struct test_list *test;
for (test = tests; test->func; test++) {
benchmark(test, true);
benchmark(test, false);
}
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-30 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-24 2:15 Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-24 2:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-26 12:34 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-24 3:58 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-24 9:59 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-24 10:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-24 19:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-24 11:27 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-24 12:00 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-24 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-24 17:33 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-24 17:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-24 17:57 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-24 20:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-24 20:46 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-24 20:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-24 21:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-24 21:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-24 21:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-24 21:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-24 21:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-24 21:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-25 2:17 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-26 23:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-24 20:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-25 21:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-26 11:22 ` perf numbers (was: Re: [PATCH] x86_64, asm: Work around AMD SYSRET SS descriptor attribute issue) Borislav Petkov
2015-04-26 23:39 ` [PATCH] x86_64, asm: Work around AMD SYSRET SS descriptor attribute issue Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-27 8:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 10:07 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-27 10:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 11:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 12:08 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-27 12:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 14:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 15:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 15:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 15:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 15:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-27 16:04 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-27 16:10 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-27 16:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 16:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 18:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 18:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 18:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 19:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-27 20:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 20:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-28 15:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-28 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-28 16:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-28 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-28 18:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-30 21:39 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2015-04-30 23:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-05-01 9:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-03 11:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 19:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 19:21 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-27 19:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-28 13:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 16:12 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-27 18:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-27 18:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 14:39 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5542A0FB.50707@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome