mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@intel.com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [patch V2 22/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Cleanup the printk output
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:06:59 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160222110442.063337470@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160222110337.198341739@linutronix.de>

[-- Attachment #1: x86-perf-intel-rapl--Cleanup-the-printk-output.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2722 bytes --]

The output is inconsistent. Use a proper pr_fmt prefix and split out the
advertisement into a seperate function.

Remove the WARN_ON in the failure case. It's pointless as we already know
where it failed.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c |   42 +++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Index: b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
  * the duration of the measurement. Tools may use a function such as
  * ldexp(raw_count, -32);
  */
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "RAPL PMU: " fmt
+
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
@@ -144,7 +147,7 @@ static inline u64 rapl_read_counter(stru
 static inline u64 rapl_scale(u64 v, int cfg)
 {
 	if (cfg > NR_RAPL_DOMAINS) {
-		pr_warn("invalid domain %d, failed to scale data\n", cfg);
+		pr_warn("Invalid domain %d, failed to scale data\n", cfg);
 		return v;
 	}
 	/*
@@ -680,6 +683,21 @@ static int rapl_check_hw_unit(void (*qui
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void __init rapl_advertise(void)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	pr_info("API unit is 2^-32 Joules, %d fixed counters, %llu ms ovfl timer\n",
+		hweight32(rapl_cntr_mask), rapl_timer_ms);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < NR_RAPL_DOMAINS; i++) {
+		if (rapl_cntr_mask & (1 << i)) {
+			pr_info("hw unit of domain %s 2^-%d Joules\n",
+				rapl_domain_names[i], rapl_hw_unit[i]);
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 static void __init cleanup_rapl_pmus(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
@@ -696,7 +714,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_cpu_
 static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
 {
 	void (*quirk)(void) = NULL;
-	int cpu, ret, i;
+	int cpu, ret;
 
 	/*
 	 * check for Intel processor family 6
@@ -751,30 +769,16 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
 	}
 
 	ret = perf_pmu_register(&rapl_pmu_class, "power", -1);
-	if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
-		pr_info("RAPL PMU detected, registration failed (%d), RAPL PMU disabled\n", ret);
+	if (ret)
 		goto out;
-	}
 
 	__perf_cpu_notifier(rapl_cpu_notifier);
 	cpu_notifier_register_done();
-
-	pr_info("RAPL PMU detected,"
-		" API unit is 2^-32 Joules,"
-		" %d fixed counters"
-		" %llu ms ovfl timer\n",
-		hweight32(rapl_cntr_mask),
-		rapl_timer_ms);
-	for (i = 0; i < NR_RAPL_DOMAINS; i++) {
-		if (rapl_cntr_mask & (1 << i)) {
-			pr_info("hw unit of domain %s 2^-%d Joules\n",
-				rapl_domain_names[i], rapl_hw_unit[i]);
-		}
-	}
-
+	rapl_advertise();
 	return 0;
 
 out:
+	pr_warn("Initialization failed (%d), disabled\n", ret);
 	cleanup_rapl_pmus();
 	cpu_notifier_register_done();
 	return ret;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-22 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-22 11:06 [patch V2 00/28] x86/perf/intel/uncore|rapl: Fix error handling and sanitize pmu management Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 01/28] x86/perf/intel/uncore: Remove pointless mask check Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 03/28] x86/perf/intel/uncore: Fix error handling Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 02/28] x86/perf/intel/uncore: Simplify error rollback Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 04/28] x86/perf/intel/uncore: Add sanity checks for pci dev package id Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 05/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Cleanup hardware on exit Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 06/28] x86/perf/intel/uncore: Drop pointless hotplug priority Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 07/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Make code readable Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 08/28] x86/perf/uncore: Make uncore_pcibus_to_physid static Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 09/28] perf: Allow storage of pmu private data in event Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 11/28] x86/topology: Create logical package id Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 18:54   ` Andi Kleen
2016-02-22 19:05     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 10/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Store box in event->pmu_private Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-22 11:58     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-22 12:00     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 12/28] x86/perf/uncore: Track packages not per cpu data Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 13/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Clear all hardware state on exit Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-22 11:59     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 14/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Make PCI and MSR uncore independent Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 15/28] cpumask: Export cpumask_any_but Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 16/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Make it modular Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 17/28] x86/perf/cqm: Get rid of the silly for_each_cpu lookups Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 18/28] x86/perf/intel_rapl: Make Knights Landings support functional Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 20:38   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 19/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Add proper error handling Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 20/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Sanitize the quirk handling Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 21/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Calculate timing once Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-02-22 18:44   ` [patch V2 22/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Cleanup the printk output Andi Kleen
2016-02-22 18:58     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [patch V2 23/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Refactor code some more Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:07 ` [patch V2 24/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Make pmu lock raw Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:07 ` [patch V2 25/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Utilize event->pmu_private Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:07 ` [patch V2 26/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Convert it to a per package facility Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 12:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-22 15:52     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 16:04       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-22 11:07 ` [patch V2 28/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Make it modular Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 18:40   ` Andi Kleen
2016-02-22 19:11     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 11:07 ` [patch V2 27/28] perf: Export perf_event_sysfs_show Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-22 12:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-22 18:55 ` [patch V2 00/28] x86/perf/intel/uncore|rapl: Fix error handling and sanitize pmu management Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160222110442.063337470@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=harish.chegondi@intel.com \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®