From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Brijesh Singh" <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>,
"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: [Part2 PATCH v4 15/29] KVM: SVM: VMRUN should use assosiated ASID when SEV is enabled
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:46:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170919204627.3875-16-brijesh.singh@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170919204627.3875-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
SEV hardware uses ASIDs to associate memory encryption key with the
guest VMs. During the guest creation time, SEV VM use SEV_CMD_ACTIVATE
command to bind a particular ASID to the guest. Lets make sure that the
VMCB is programmed with the bound ASID before a VMRUN.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 229bb7d09c44..0149bfa75bb2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -213,6 +213,9 @@ struct vcpu_svm {
*/
struct list_head ir_list;
spinlock_t ir_list_lock;
+
+ /* which host CPU was used for running this vcpu */
+ unsigned int last_cpu;
};
/*
@@ -336,6 +339,13 @@ static inline bool sev_guest(struct kvm *kvm)
return sev->active;
}
+static inline int sev_get_asid(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &kvm->arch.sev_info;
+
+ return sev->asid;
+}
+
static inline void mark_all_dirty(struct vmcb *vmcb)
{
vmcb->control.clean = 0;
@@ -546,6 +556,9 @@ struct svm_cpu_data {
struct kvm_ldttss_desc *tss_desc;
struct page *save_area;
+
+ /* index = sev_asid, value = vmcb pointer */
+ struct vmcb **sev_vmcbs;
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct svm_cpu_data *, svm_data);
@@ -859,6 +872,7 @@ static void svm_cpu_uninit(int cpu)
return;
per_cpu(svm_data, raw_smp_processor_id()) = NULL;
+ kfree(sd->sev_vmcbs);
__free_page(sd->save_area);
kfree(sd);
}
@@ -872,11 +886,18 @@ static int svm_cpu_init(int cpu)
if (!sd)
return -ENOMEM;
sd->cpu = cpu;
- sd->save_area = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
r = -ENOMEM;
+ sd->save_area = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
if (!sd->save_area)
goto err_1;
+ if (svm_sev_enabled()) {
+ r = -ENOMEM;
+ sd->sev_vmcbs = kmalloc((max_sev_asid + 1) * sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!sd->sev_vmcbs)
+ goto err_1;
+ }
+
per_cpu(svm_data, cpu) = sd;
return 0;
@@ -1503,7 +1524,8 @@ static void sev_firmware_exit(void)
static void sev_asid_free(struct kvm *kvm)
{
struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &kvm->arch.sev_info;
- int pos, asid;
+ struct svm_cpu_data *sd;
+ int pos, asid, cpu;
if (svm_sev_enabled())
return;
@@ -1511,6 +1533,11 @@ static void sev_asid_free(struct kvm *kvm)
asid = sev->asid;
pos = asid - 1;
clear_bit(pos, sev_asid_bitmap);
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ sd = per_cpu(svm_data, cpu);
+ sd->sev_vmcbs[pos] = NULL;
+ }
}
static void sev_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
@@ -4444,12 +4471,39 @@ static void reload_tss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
load_TR_desc();
}
+static void pre_sev_run(struct vcpu_svm *svm, int cpu)
+{
+ struct svm_cpu_data *sd = per_cpu(svm_data, cpu);
+ int asid = sev_get_asid(svm->vcpu.kvm);
+
+ /* Assign the asid allocated with this SEV guest */
+ svm->vmcb->control.asid = asid;
+
+ /*
+ * Flush guest TLB:
+ *
+ * 1) when different VMCB for the same ASID is to be run on the same host CPU.
+ * 2) or this VMCB was executed on different host CPU in previous VMRUNs.
+ */
+ if (sd->sev_vmcbs[asid] == svm->vmcb &&
+ svm->last_cpu == cpu)
+ return;
+
+ svm->last_cpu = cpu;
+ sd->sev_vmcbs[asid] = svm->vmcb;
+ svm->vmcb->control.tlb_ctl = TLB_CONTROL_FLUSH_ASID;
+ mark_dirty(svm->vmcb, VMCB_ASID);
+}
+
static void pre_svm_run(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
struct svm_cpu_data *sd = per_cpu(svm_data, cpu);
+ if (sev_guest(svm->vcpu.kvm))
+ return pre_sev_run(svm, cpu);
+
/* FIXME: handle wraparound of asid_generation */
if (svm->asid_generation != sd->asid_generation)
new_asid(svm, sd);
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-19 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-19 20:45 [Part2 PATCH v4 00/29] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:45 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 01/29] Documentation/virtual/kvm: Add AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) Brijesh Singh
2017-09-29 6:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-02 11:52 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-02 13:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-04 10:11 ` [PATCH v5] " Borislav Petkov
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 02/29] x86/CPU/AMD: Add the Secure Encrypted Virtualization CPU feature Brijesh Singh
2017-09-29 12:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-29 22:44 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-30 8:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 03/29] kvm: svm: prepare for new bit definition in nested_ctl Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 04/29] kvm: svm: Add SEV feature definitions to KVM Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 05/29] crypto: ccp: Add Platform Security Processor (PSP) device support Brijesh Singh
2017-09-29 15:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-29 16:23 ` [Part2 PATCH v4.1 05/30] " Brijesh Singh
2017-09-30 8:30 ` [PATCH] crypto: ccp: Build the AMD secure processor driver only with AMD CPU support Borislav Petkov
2017-09-30 14:06 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-30 15:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-30 15:55 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 05/29] crypto: ccp: Add Platform Security Processor (PSP) device support Brijesh Singh
2017-09-30 16:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-01 20:05 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-03 16:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-03 16:19 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-02 16:43 ` [Part2 Patch v4.2] " Brijesh Singh
2017-10-04 6:36 ` P J P
2017-10-04 9:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 06/29] ccp: crypto: Define SEV key management command id Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 07/29] crypto: ccp: Add Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) command support Brijesh Singh
2017-09-22 21:35 ` kbuild test robot
2017-09-22 21:35 ` [PATCH] crypto: ccp: fix eno.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 08/29] KVM: SVM: Prepare to reserve asid for SEV guest Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 09/29] KVM: SVM: Reserve ASID range " Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 10/29] KVM: X86: Extend CPUID range to include new leaf Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 11/29] KVM: Introduce KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_OP ioctl Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 12/29] KVM: Introduce KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REGISTER_REGION ioctl Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 13/29] KVM: Define SEV key management command id Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 14/29] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_INIT command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` Brijesh Singh [this message]
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 16/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_START command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-22 22:13 ` [PATCH] KVM: SVM: fix eno.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2017-09-22 22:13 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 16/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_START command kbuild test robot
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 17/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_UPDATE_DATA command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 18/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_MEASURE command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 19/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_FINISH command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 20/29] KVM: svm: Add support for SEV GUEST_STATUS command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 21/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV DEBUG_DECRYPT command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 22/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV DEBUG_ENCRYPT command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 23/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_SECRET command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 24/29] KVM: SVM: Pin guest memory when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 25/29] KVM: X86: Add memory encryption enabled ops Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 26/29] KVM: SVM: Clear C-bit from the page fault address Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 27/29] KVM: SVM: Do not install #UD intercept when SEV is enabled Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 28/29] KVM: X86: Restart the guest when insn_len is zero and " Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 29/29] KVM: X86: Add CONFIG_KVM_AMD_SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-09-22 20:37 ` kbuild test robot
2017-09-22 22:18 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170919204627.3875-16-brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--to=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®