mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, "Brijesh Singh" <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: [Part2 PATCH v4 03/29] kvm: svm: prepare for new bit definition in nested_ctl
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:46:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170919204627.3875-4-brijesh.singh@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170919204627.3875-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com>

From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

Currently the nested_ctl variable in the vmcb_control_area structure is
used to indicate nested paging support. The nested paging support field
is actually defined as bit 0 of the field. In order to support a new
feature flag the usage of the nested_ctl and nested paging support must
be converted to operate on a single bit.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h | 2 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c         | 7 ++++---
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
index 14835dd205a5..5e3244724c9d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
@@ -145,6 +145,8 @@ struct __attribute__ ((__packed__)) vmcb_control_area {
 #define SVM_VM_CR_SVM_LOCK_MASK 0x0008ULL
 #define SVM_VM_CR_SVM_DIS_MASK  0x0010ULL
 
+#define SVM_NESTED_CTL_NP_ENABLE	BIT(0)
+
 struct __attribute__ ((__packed__)) vmcb_seg {
 	u16 selector;
 	u16 attrib;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 0e68f0b3cbf7..8186b8d7c469 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ static void init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 
 	if (npt_enabled) {
 		/* Setup VMCB for Nested Paging */
-		control->nested_ctl = 1;
+		control->nested_ctl |= SVM_NESTED_CTL_NP_ENABLE;
 		clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_INVLPG);
 		clr_exception_intercept(svm, PF_VECTOR);
 		clr_cr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR3_READ);
@@ -2910,7 +2910,8 @@ static bool nested_vmcb_checks(struct vmcb *vmcb)
 	if (vmcb->control.asid == 0)
 		return false;
 
-	if (vmcb->control.nested_ctl && !npt_enabled)
+	if ((vmcb->control.nested_ctl & SVM_NESTED_CTL_NP_ENABLE) &&
+	    !npt_enabled)
 		return false;
 
 	return true;
@@ -2985,7 +2986,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	else
 		svm->vcpu.arch.hflags &= ~HF_HIF_MASK;
 
-	if (nested_vmcb->control.nested_ctl) {
+	if (nested_vmcb->control.nested_ctl & SVM_NESTED_CTL_NP_ENABLE) {
 		kvm_mmu_unload(&svm->vcpu);
 		svm->nested.nested_cr3 = nested_vmcb->control.nested_cr3;
 		nested_svm_init_mmu_context(&svm->vcpu);
-- 
2.9.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-09-19 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-19 20:45 [Part2 PATCH v4 00/29] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:45 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 01/29] Documentation/virtual/kvm: Add AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) Brijesh Singh
2017-09-29  6:54   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-02 11:52     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-02 13:21       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-04 10:11   ` [PATCH v5] " Borislav Petkov
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 02/29] x86/CPU/AMD: Add the Secure Encrypted Virtualization CPU feature Brijesh Singh
2017-09-29 12:19   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-29 22:44     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-30  8:02       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-19 20:46 ` Brijesh Singh [this message]
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 04/29] kvm: svm: Add SEV feature definitions to KVM Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 05/29] crypto: ccp: Add Platform Security Processor (PSP) device support Brijesh Singh
2017-09-29 15:16   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-29 16:23     ` [Part2 PATCH v4.1 05/30] " Brijesh Singh
2017-09-30  8:30       ` [PATCH] crypto: ccp: Build the AMD secure processor driver only with AMD CPU support Borislav Petkov
2017-09-30 14:06         ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-30 15:53           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-30 15:55     ` [Part2 PATCH v4 05/29] crypto: ccp: Add Platform Security Processor (PSP) device support Brijesh Singh
2017-09-30 16:11       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-01 20:05         ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-03 16:17           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-03 16:19             ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-02 16:43   ` [Part2 Patch v4.2] " Brijesh Singh
2017-10-04  6:36     ` P J P
2017-10-04  9:15       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 06/29] ccp: crypto: Define SEV key management command id Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 07/29] crypto: ccp: Add Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) command support Brijesh Singh
2017-09-22 21:35   ` kbuild test robot
2017-09-22 21:35   ` [PATCH] crypto: ccp: fix eno.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 08/29] KVM: SVM: Prepare to reserve asid for SEV guest Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 09/29] KVM: SVM: Reserve ASID range " Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 10/29] KVM: X86: Extend CPUID range to include new leaf Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 11/29] KVM: Introduce KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_OP ioctl Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 12/29] KVM: Introduce KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REGISTER_REGION ioctl Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 13/29] KVM: Define SEV key management command id Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 14/29] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_INIT command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 15/29] KVM: SVM: VMRUN should use assosiated ASID when SEV is enabled Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 16/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_START command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-22 22:13   ` kbuild test robot
2017-09-22 22:13   ` [PATCH] KVM: SVM: fix eno.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 17/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_UPDATE_DATA command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 18/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_MEASURE command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 19/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_FINISH command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 20/29] KVM: svm: Add support for SEV GUEST_STATUS command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 21/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV DEBUG_DECRYPT command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 22/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV DEBUG_ENCRYPT command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 23/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_SECRET command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 24/29] KVM: SVM: Pin guest memory when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 25/29] KVM: X86: Add memory encryption enabled ops Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 26/29] KVM: SVM: Clear C-bit from the page fault address Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 27/29] KVM: SVM: Do not install #UD intercept when SEV is enabled Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 28/29] KVM: X86: Restart the guest when insn_len is zero and " Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 29/29] KVM: X86: Add CONFIG_KVM_AMD_SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-09-22 20:37   ` kbuild test robot
2017-09-22 22:18   ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170919204627.3875-4-brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --to=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®