mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: brijesh.singh@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Part2 PATCH v4 02/29] x86/CPU/AMD: Add the Secure Encrypted Virtualization CPU feature
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:44:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2c19c75-d66e-682c-f545-3276c6dc995e@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170929121900.3wc5axlkanfggpdr@pd.tnic>



On 09/29/2017 07:19 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
...

> 
> This one was in the Part1 set, right? It landed here for whatever
> reason...
> 

Part1 is based on tip/master and Part2 is based on kvm/master.

With the current division, we should be able to compile and run part1
and part2 independently. This patch defines X86_FEATURE_SEV which is
currently been used by svm.c hence I kept the patch in Part2.

If we move it in Part1 then Part2 build will fail -- I am okay with
including it as a pre-cursor to Part2 series. Is this something acceptable?

-Brijesh

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-29 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-19 20:45 [Part2 PATCH v4 00/29] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:45 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 01/29] Documentation/virtual/kvm: Add AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) Brijesh Singh
2017-09-29  6:54   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-02 11:52     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-02 13:21       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-04 10:11   ` [PATCH v5] " Borislav Petkov
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 02/29] x86/CPU/AMD: Add the Secure Encrypted Virtualization CPU feature Brijesh Singh
2017-09-29 12:19   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-29 22:44     ` Brijesh Singh [this message]
2017-09-30  8:02       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 03/29] kvm: svm: prepare for new bit definition in nested_ctl Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 04/29] kvm: svm: Add SEV feature definitions to KVM Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 05/29] crypto: ccp: Add Platform Security Processor (PSP) device support Brijesh Singh
2017-09-29 15:16   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-29 16:23     ` [Part2 PATCH v4.1 05/30] " Brijesh Singh
2017-09-30  8:30       ` [PATCH] crypto: ccp: Build the AMD secure processor driver only with AMD CPU support Borislav Petkov
2017-09-30 14:06         ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-30 15:53           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-30 15:55     ` [Part2 PATCH v4 05/29] crypto: ccp: Add Platform Security Processor (PSP) device support Brijesh Singh
2017-09-30 16:11       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-01 20:05         ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-03 16:17           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-03 16:19             ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-02 16:43   ` [Part2 Patch v4.2] " Brijesh Singh
2017-10-04  6:36     ` P J P
2017-10-04  9:15       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 06/29] ccp: crypto: Define SEV key management command id Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 07/29] crypto: ccp: Add Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) command support Brijesh Singh
2017-09-22 21:35   ` [PATCH] crypto: ccp: fix eno.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2017-09-22 21:35   ` [Part2 PATCH v4 07/29] crypto: ccp: Add Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) command support kbuild test robot
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 08/29] KVM: SVM: Prepare to reserve asid for SEV guest Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 09/29] KVM: SVM: Reserve ASID range " Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 10/29] KVM: X86: Extend CPUID range to include new leaf Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 11/29] KVM: Introduce KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_OP ioctl Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 12/29] KVM: Introduce KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REGISTER_REGION ioctl Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 13/29] KVM: Define SEV key management command id Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 14/29] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_INIT command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 15/29] KVM: SVM: VMRUN should use assosiated ASID when SEV is enabled Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 16/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_START command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-22 22:13   ` kbuild test robot
2017-09-22 22:13   ` [PATCH] KVM: SVM: fix eno.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 17/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_UPDATE_DATA command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 18/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_MEASURE command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 19/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_FINISH command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 20/29] KVM: svm: Add support for SEV GUEST_STATUS command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 21/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV DEBUG_DECRYPT command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 22/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV DEBUG_ENCRYPT command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 23/29] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_SECRET command Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 24/29] KVM: SVM: Pin guest memory when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 25/29] KVM: X86: Add memory encryption enabled ops Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 26/29] KVM: SVM: Clear C-bit from the page fault address Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 27/29] KVM: SVM: Do not install #UD intercept when SEV is enabled Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 28/29] KVM: X86: Restart the guest when insn_len is zero and " Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 20:46 ` [Part2 PATCH v4 29/29] KVM: X86: Add CONFIG_KVM_AMD_SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-09-22 20:37   ` kbuild test robot
2017-09-22 22:18   ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f2c19c75-d66e-682c-f545-3276c6dc995e@amd.com \
    --to=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®