* [PATCH] kmemcheck: correctly remove kmemcheck call from dma_map_sg_attrs
@ 2017-10-12 19:22 Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)
2017-10-13 7:11 ` Michal Hocko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) @ 2017-10-12 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: linux-kernel, mhocko, Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)
We have missed removing some code as part of removing the kmemcheck
hooks.
Unfourtenatly this got missed during my review, and the code was
still building.
Reported-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
---
include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
index 83f3ab31efc4..2911389bc147 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
@@ -260,10 +260,8 @@ static inline int dma_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
unsigned long attrs)
{
const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
- int i, ents;
- struct scatterlist *s;
+ int ents;
- for_each_sg(sg, s, nents, i)
BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir));
ents = ops->map_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs);
BUG_ON(ents < 0);
--
2.11.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: correctly remove kmemcheck call from dma_map_sg_attrs
2017-10-12 19:22 [PATCH] kmemcheck: correctly remove kmemcheck call from dma_map_sg_attrs Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)
@ 2017-10-13 7:11 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-13 14:05 ` Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2017-10-13 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin); +Cc: akpm, linux-kernel
On Thu 12-10-17 19:22:05, Sasha Levin wrote:
> We have missed removing some code as part of removing the kmemcheck
> hooks.
>
> Unfourtenatly this got missed during my review, and the code was
> still building.
>
> Reported-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Yes this would be the proper fix for the specific issue I have noticed.
There might be others I haven't even checked. Really the only way to
make this chage is to post a reproducible steps to regenerate your diff
and review that the used scripts are correct. Follow up fixes are not a
way to go
> ---
> include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> index 83f3ab31efc4..2911389bc147 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -260,10 +260,8 @@ static inline int dma_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
> unsigned long attrs)
> {
> const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
> - int i, ents;
> - struct scatterlist *s;
> + int ents;
>
> - for_each_sg(sg, s, nents, i)
> BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir));
> ents = ops->map_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs);
> BUG_ON(ents < 0);
> --
> 2.11.0
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: correctly remove kmemcheck call from dma_map_sg_attrs
2017-10-13 7:11 ` Michal Hocko
@ 2017-10-13 14:05 ` Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) @ 2017-10-13 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Hocko; +Cc: akpm, linux-kernel
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:11:21AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>On Thu 12-10-17 19:22:05, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> We have missed removing some code as part of removing the kmemcheck
>> hooks.
>>
>> Unfourtenatly this got missed during my review, and the code was
>> still building.
>>
>> Reported-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
>
>Yes this would be the proper fix for the specific issue I have noticed.
>There might be others I haven't even checked. Really the only way to
>make this chage is to post a reproducible steps to regenerate your diff
>and review that the used scripts are correct. Follow up fixes are not a
>way to go
So the only part of this series that was scripted to some extend was
this commit we're looking at. The 3 other commits are done manually
(although their large size is mostly attributed to 'git rm').
Even for this commit, I don't see a way to have it completely scripted
given that we're not simply removing calls.
I've looked at the ~50 deletions of kmemcheck calls in this commit to
make sure they make sense.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-13 14:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-12 19:22 [PATCH] kmemcheck: correctly remove kmemcheck call from dma_map_sg_attrs Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)
2017-10-13 7:11 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-13 14:05 ` Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®