* [PATCH v4 0/2] rcu/nocb: Delete local variable 'need_rcu_nocb_mask' in rcu_init_nohz()
@ 2022-08-17 1:42 Zhen Lei
2022-08-17 1:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu: Eliminate rcu_state.nocb_is_setup Zhen Lei
2022-08-17 1:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] rcu: Simplify the code logic of rcu_init_nohz() Zhen Lei
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Zhen Lei @ 2022-08-17 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E . McKenney, Frederic Weisbecker, Neeraj Upadhyay,
Josh Triplett, Steven Rostedt, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan,
Joel Fernandes, rcu, linux-kernel
Cc: Zhen Lei
v3 --> v4:
Fix a build warning.
- struct cpumask *cpumask = NULL;
+ const struct cpumask *cpumask = NULL;
v2 --> v3:
1. Eliminate rcu_state.nocb_is_setup
2. Update the code based on the above patch and commit b37a667c6242
("rcu/nocb: Add an option to offload all CPUs on boot").
Test cases and test results as below:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL | CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL | cmdline |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1) N | N | none |
2) N | N | rcu_nocbs=1-2 |
3) Y | N | nohz_full=1-2 |
4) Y | Y | none |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1)
[ 1085.691770] rcu-torture:--- End of test: SUCCESS: (default)
root@genericarmv8:~# dmesg | grep "Offload RCU callbacks"
[ 0.000000] rcu: Offload RCU callbacks from CPUs: (none).
root@genericarmv8:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep NOCB
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y
# CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL is not set
root@genericarmv8:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep NO_HZ_FULL
# CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is not set
root@genericarmv8:~# cat /proc/cmdline
console=ttyAMA0 root=/dev/vda2 crashkernel=256M@ee000000
2)
[ 1022.532198] rcu-torture:--- End of test: SUCCESS: (default)
root@genericarmv8:~# dmesg | grep "Offload RCU callbacks"
[ 0.000000] rcu: Offload RCU callbacks from CPUs: 1-2.
root@genericarmv8:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep NOCB
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y
# CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL is not set
root@genericarmv8:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep NO_HZ_FULL
# CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is not set
root@genericarmv8:~# cat /proc/cmdline
console=ttyAMA0 root=/dev/vda2 crashkernel=256M@ee000000 rcu_nocbs=1-2
3)
[ 1011.714712] rcu-torture:--- End of test: SUCCESS: (default)
root@genericarmv8:~# dmesg | grep "Offload RCU callbacks"
[ 0.000000] rcu: Offload RCU callbacks from CPUs: 1-2.
root@genericarmv8:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep NOCB
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y
# CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL is not set
root@genericarmv8:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep NO_HZ_FULL
CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y
root@genericarmv8:~# cat /proc/cmdline
console=ttyAMA0 root=/dev/vda2 crashkernel=256M@ee000000 nohz_full=1-2
4)
[ 1031.047094] rcu-torture:--- End of test: SUCCESS: (default)
root@genericarmv8:~# dmesg | grep "Offload RCU callbacks"
[ 0.000000] rcu: Offload RCU callbacks from CPUs: 0-3.
root@genericarmv8:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep NOCB
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y
root@genericarmv8:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep NO_HZ_FULL
CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y
root@genericarmv8:~# cat /proc/cmdline
console=ttyAMA0 root=/dev/vda2 crashkernel=256M@ee000000
v1 --> v2:
Update commit message.
Zhen Lei (2):
rcu: Eliminate rcu_state.nocb_is_setup
rcu: Simplify the code logic of rcu_init_nohz()
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 1 -
kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 38 +++++++++++---------------------------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu: Eliminate rcu_state.nocb_is_setup
2022-08-17 1:42 [PATCH v4 0/2] rcu/nocb: Delete local variable 'need_rcu_nocb_mask' in rcu_init_nohz() Zhen Lei
@ 2022-08-17 1:42 ` Zhen Lei
2022-08-22 16:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-17 1:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] rcu: Simplify the code logic of rcu_init_nohz() Zhen Lei
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Zhen Lei @ 2022-08-17 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E . McKenney, Frederic Weisbecker, Neeraj Upadhyay,
Josh Triplett, Steven Rostedt, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan,
Joel Fernandes, rcu, linux-kernel
Cc: Zhen Lei
'rcu_state.nocb_is_setup' is initialized to true only if 'rcu_nocb_mask'
successfully allocates memory. So it can be replaced by
'cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)'. More importantly, the latter is more
intuitive, and it has been used in several places.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 1 -
kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 8 +++-----
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index d4a97e40ea9c3e2..06f659c63d2d192 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -375,7 +375,6 @@ struct rcu_state {
arch_spinlock_t ofl_lock ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
/* Synchronize offline with */
/* GP pre-initialization. */
- int nocb_is_setup; /* nocb is setup from boot */
};
/* Values for rcu_state structure's gp_flags field. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index 0a5f0ef41484518..ff763e7dc53551f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ static int __init rcu_nocb_setup(char *str)
cpumask_setall(rcu_nocb_mask);
}
}
- rcu_state.nocb_is_setup = true;
return 1;
}
__setup("rcu_nocbs", rcu_nocb_setup);
@@ -1215,7 +1214,7 @@ void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
struct rcu_data *rdp;
#if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL)
- if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup) {
+ if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
offload_all = true;
}
@@ -1235,10 +1234,9 @@ void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
return;
}
}
- rcu_state.nocb_is_setup = true;
}
- if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup)
+ if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask))
return;
#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
@@ -1299,7 +1297,7 @@ static void rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread(int cpu)
struct task_struct *t;
struct sched_param sp;
- if (!rcu_scheduler_fully_active || !rcu_state.nocb_is_setup)
+ if (!rcu_scheduler_fully_active || !cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask))
return;
/* If there already is an rcuo kthread, then nothing to do. */
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/2] rcu: Simplify the code logic of rcu_init_nohz()
2022-08-17 1:42 [PATCH v4 0/2] rcu/nocb: Delete local variable 'need_rcu_nocb_mask' in rcu_init_nohz() Zhen Lei
2022-08-17 1:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu: Eliminate rcu_state.nocb_is_setup Zhen Lei
@ 2022-08-17 1:42 ` Zhen Lei
2022-08-22 16:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Zhen Lei @ 2022-08-17 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E . McKenney, Frederic Weisbecker, Neeraj Upadhyay,
Josh Triplett, Steven Rostedt, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan,
Joel Fernandes, rcu, linux-kernel
Cc: Zhen Lei
When CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y or CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, additional
CPUs need to be added to 'rcu_nocb_mask'. But 'rcu_nocb_mask' may be not
available now, due to 'rcu_nocbs' is not specified. Check and initialize
'rcu_nocb_mask' before using it. This code simplification strictly follows
this logic, compared with old implementations, unnecessary crossovers are
avoided and easy to understand.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 32 +++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index ff763e7dc53551f..3c59b12f4465af1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -1209,44 +1209,30 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_nocb_cpu_offload);
void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
{
int cpu;
- bool need_rcu_nocb_mask = false;
- bool offload_all = false;
struct rcu_data *rdp;
+ const struct cpumask *cpumask = NULL;
#if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL)
- if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
- need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
- offload_all = true;
- }
-#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL) */
-
-#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
- if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask)) {
- need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
- offload_all = false; /* NO_HZ_FULL has its own mask. */
- }
-#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
+ cpumask = cpu_possible_mask;
+#elif defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
+ if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask))
+ cpumask = tick_nohz_full_mask;
+#endif
- if (need_rcu_nocb_mask) {
+ if (cpumask) {
if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
pr_info("rcu_nocb_mask allocation failed, callback offloading disabled.\n");
return;
}
}
+
+ cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, cpumask);
}
if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask))
return;
-#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
- if (tick_nohz_full_running)
- cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
-#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
-
- if (offload_all)
- cpumask_setall(rcu_nocb_mask);
-
if (!cpumask_subset(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask)) {
pr_info("\tNote: kernel parameter 'rcu_nocbs=', 'nohz_full', or 'isolcpus=' contains nonexistent CPUs.\n");
cpumask_and(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask,
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu: Eliminate rcu_state.nocb_is_setup
2022-08-17 1:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu: Eliminate rcu_state.nocb_is_setup Zhen Lei
@ 2022-08-22 16:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-23 12:00 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2022-08-22 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhen Lei
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker, Neeraj Upadhyay, Josh Triplett,
Steven Rostedt, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan, Joel Fernandes,
rcu, linux-kernel
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:42:52AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> 'rcu_state.nocb_is_setup' is initialized to true only if 'rcu_nocb_mask'
> successfully allocates memory. So it can be replaced by
> 'cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)'. More importantly, the latter is more
> intuitive, and it has been used in several places.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
One of the implementations of cpumask_available() does indeed check
for NULL. But here is the other one:
static inline bool cpumask_available(cpumask_var_t mask)
{
return true;
}
So I have to ask... In a kernel built with CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n,
will this change really work?
Another important question is "Do all of the existing uses of
cpumask_available() really work?" Yes, I do believe that they do
work, but it would be good to get another set of eyes on that code.
"All software developers are blind!" ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.h | 1 -
> kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 8 +++-----
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> index d4a97e40ea9c3e2..06f659c63d2d192 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> @@ -375,7 +375,6 @@ struct rcu_state {
> arch_spinlock_t ofl_lock ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
> /* Synchronize offline with */
> /* GP pre-initialization. */
> - int nocb_is_setup; /* nocb is setup from boot */
> };
>
> /* Values for rcu_state structure's gp_flags field. */
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> index 0a5f0ef41484518..ff763e7dc53551f 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ static int __init rcu_nocb_setup(char *str)
> cpumask_setall(rcu_nocb_mask);
> }
> }
> - rcu_state.nocb_is_setup = true;
> return 1;
> }
> __setup("rcu_nocbs", rcu_nocb_setup);
> @@ -1215,7 +1214,7 @@ void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
> struct rcu_data *rdp;
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL)
> - if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup) {
> + if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
> need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
> offload_all = true;
> }
> @@ -1235,10 +1234,9 @@ void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
> return;
> }
> }
> - rcu_state.nocb_is_setup = true;
> }
>
> - if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup)
> + if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask))
> return;
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> @@ -1299,7 +1297,7 @@ static void rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread(int cpu)
> struct task_struct *t;
> struct sched_param sp;
>
> - if (!rcu_scheduler_fully_active || !rcu_state.nocb_is_setup)
> + if (!rcu_scheduler_fully_active || !cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask))
> return;
>
> /* If there already is an rcuo kthread, then nothing to do. */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] rcu: Simplify the code logic of rcu_init_nohz()
2022-08-17 1:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] rcu: Simplify the code logic of rcu_init_nohz() Zhen Lei
@ 2022-08-22 16:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-23 12:13 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2022-08-22 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhen Lei
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker, Neeraj Upadhyay, Josh Triplett,
Steven Rostedt, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan, Joel Fernandes,
rcu, linux-kernel
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:42:53AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> When CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y or CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, additional
> CPUs need to be added to 'rcu_nocb_mask'. But 'rcu_nocb_mask' may be not
> available now, due to 'rcu_nocbs' is not specified. Check and initialize
> 'rcu_nocb_mask' before using it. This code simplification strictly follows
> this logic, compared with old implementations, unnecessary crossovers are
> avoided and easy to understand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
This looks like a nice simplification, but I will wait for your response
on Patch 1/1 before trying it out.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 32 +++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> index ff763e7dc53551f..3c59b12f4465af1 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> @@ -1209,44 +1209,30 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_nocb_cpu_offload);
> void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
> {
> int cpu;
> - bool need_rcu_nocb_mask = false;
> - bool offload_all = false;
> struct rcu_data *rdp;
> + const struct cpumask *cpumask = NULL;
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL)
> - if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
> - need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
> - offload_all = true;
> - }
> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL) */
> -
> -#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> - if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask)) {
> - need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
> - offload_all = false; /* NO_HZ_FULL has its own mask. */
> - }
> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> + cpumask = cpu_possible_mask;
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> + if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask))
> + cpumask = tick_nohz_full_mask;
> +#endif
>
> - if (need_rcu_nocb_mask) {
> + if (cpumask) {
> if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
> if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> pr_info("rcu_nocb_mask allocation failed, callback offloading disabled.\n");
> return;
> }
> }
> +
> + cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, cpumask);
> }
>
> if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask))
> return;
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> - if (tick_nohz_full_running)
> - cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> -
> - if (offload_all)
> - cpumask_setall(rcu_nocb_mask);
> -
> if (!cpumask_subset(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask)) {
> pr_info("\tNote: kernel parameter 'rcu_nocbs=', 'nohz_full', or 'isolcpus=' contains nonexistent CPUs.\n");
> cpumask_and(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask,
> --
> 2.25.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu: Eliminate rcu_state.nocb_is_setup
2022-08-22 16:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
@ 2022-08-23 12:00 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Leizhen (ThunderTown) @ 2022-08-23 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker, Neeraj Upadhyay, Josh Triplett,
Steven Rostedt, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan, Joel Fernandes,
rcu, linux-kernel
On 2022/8/23 0:34, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:42:52AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> 'rcu_state.nocb_is_setup' is initialized to true only if 'rcu_nocb_mask'
>> successfully allocates memory. So it can be replaced by
>> 'cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)'. More importantly, the latter is more
>> intuitive, and it has been used in several places.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
>
> One of the implementations of cpumask_available() does indeed check
> for NULL. But here is the other one:
>
> static inline bool cpumask_available(cpumask_var_t mask)
> {
> return true;
> }
Thanks for the heads-up.
>
> So I have to ask... In a kernel built with CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n,
> will this change really work?
Yes, I run the test cases on arm64, which does not turn on option
CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK by default.
I've listed a combination of build options in the cover-letter. In
this case, cpumask_empty(rcu_nocb_mask) is true.
----
CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=n, CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=n, cmdline without rcu_nocbs
[ 0.000000] rcu: Offload RCU callbacks from CPUs: (none).
----
>
> Another important question is "Do all of the existing uses of
> cpumask_available() really work?" Yes, I do believe that they do
The only functional change caused by this patch is:
For clarity, CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y and CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=n are
omitted from the following conditions.
When
CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=n and boot cmdline without 'rcu_nocbs='.
or
CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y and boot cmdline without 'nohz_full='.
The rdp->nocb_gp_kthread and rdp->nocb_cb_kthread threads are still created.
But we have provided EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL functions rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload() and
rcu_nocb_cpu_offload(), which can dynamically modify 'rcu_nocb_mask'. So it
seems appropriate to prepare these threads in advance. Of course, it looks like
only 'rcutorture' currently uses these two functions now.
Otherwise, we can do some optimization:
If none of the CPUs in a 'nocb_gp' group is marked in rcu_nocb_mask, this
grouping does not need to create corresponding threads "rcuog/%d" and "rcuo%c/%d".
And in rcu_init_nohz():
- if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup)
+ if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask) || cpumask_empty(rcu_nocb_mask))
return;
> work, but it would be good to get another set of eyes on that code.
> "All software developers are blind!" ;-)
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
>> ---
>> kernel/rcu/tree.h | 1 -
>> kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 8 +++-----
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
>> index d4a97e40ea9c3e2..06f659c63d2d192 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
>> @@ -375,7 +375,6 @@ struct rcu_state {
>> arch_spinlock_t ofl_lock ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
>> /* Synchronize offline with */
>> /* GP pre-initialization. */
>> - int nocb_is_setup; /* nocb is setup from boot */
>> };
>>
>> /* Values for rcu_state structure's gp_flags field. */
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
>> index 0a5f0ef41484518..ff763e7dc53551f 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
>> @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ static int __init rcu_nocb_setup(char *str)
>> cpumask_setall(rcu_nocb_mask);
>> }
>> }
>> - rcu_state.nocb_is_setup = true;
>> return 1;
>> }
>> __setup("rcu_nocbs", rcu_nocb_setup);
>> @@ -1215,7 +1214,7 @@ void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
>> struct rcu_data *rdp;
>>
>> #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL)
>> - if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup) {
>> + if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
>> need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
>> offload_all = true;
>> }
>> @@ -1235,10 +1234,9 @@ void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
>> return;
>> }
>> }
>> - rcu_state.nocb_is_setup = true;
>> }
>>
>> - if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup)
>> + if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask))
>> return;
>>
>> #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
>> @@ -1299,7 +1297,7 @@ static void rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread(int cpu)
>> struct task_struct *t;
>> struct sched_param sp;
>>
>> - if (!rcu_scheduler_fully_active || !rcu_state.nocb_is_setup)
>> + if (!rcu_scheduler_fully_active || !cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask))
>> return;
>>
>> /* If there already is an rcuo kthread, then nothing to do. */
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
> .
>
--
Regards,
Zhen Lei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] rcu: Simplify the code logic of rcu_init_nohz()
2022-08-22 16:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
@ 2022-08-23 12:13 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-08-25 16:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Leizhen (ThunderTown) @ 2022-08-23 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker, Neeraj Upadhyay, Josh Triplett,
Steven Rostedt, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan, Joel Fernandes,
rcu, linux-kernel
On 2022/8/23 0:35, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:42:53AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> When CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y or CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, additional
>> CPUs need to be added to 'rcu_nocb_mask'. But 'rcu_nocb_mask' may be not
>> available now, due to 'rcu_nocbs' is not specified. Check and initialize
>> 'rcu_nocb_mask' before using it. This code simplification strictly follows
>> this logic, compared with old implementations, unnecessary crossovers are
>> avoided and easy to understand.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
>
> This looks like a nice simplification, but I will wait for your response
> on Patch 1/1 before trying it out.
How about I post v5 and just do this simplification? Patch 1/2 seems to require
further discussion and in-depth analysis, which may take a long time.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
>> ---
>> kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 32 +++++++++-----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
>> index ff763e7dc53551f..3c59b12f4465af1 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
>> @@ -1209,44 +1209,30 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_nocb_cpu_offload);
>> void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
>> {
>> int cpu;
>> - bool need_rcu_nocb_mask = false;
>> - bool offload_all = false;
>> struct rcu_data *rdp;
>> + const struct cpumask *cpumask = NULL;
>>
>> #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL)
>> - if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
>> - need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
>> - offload_all = true;
>> - }
>> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL) */
>> -
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
>> - if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask)) {
>> - need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
>> - offload_all = false; /* NO_HZ_FULL has its own mask. */
>> - }
>> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
>> + cpumask = cpu_possible_mask;
>> +#elif defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
>> + if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask))
>> + cpumask = tick_nohz_full_mask;
>> +#endif
>>
>> - if (need_rcu_nocb_mask) {
>> + if (cpumask) {
>> if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
>> if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
>> pr_info("rcu_nocb_mask allocation failed, callback offloading disabled.\n");
>> return;
>> }
>> }
>> +
>> + cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, cpumask);
>> }
>>
>> if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask))
>> return;
>>
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
>> - if (tick_nohz_full_running)
>> - cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
>> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
>> -
>> - if (offload_all)
>> - cpumask_setall(rcu_nocb_mask);
>> -
>> if (!cpumask_subset(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask)) {
>> pr_info("\tNote: kernel parameter 'rcu_nocbs=', 'nohz_full', or 'isolcpus=' contains nonexistent CPUs.\n");
>> cpumask_and(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask,
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
> .
>
--
Regards,
Zhen Lei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] rcu: Simplify the code logic of rcu_init_nohz()
2022-08-23 12:13 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
@ 2022-08-25 16:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2022-08-25 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker, Neeraj Upadhyay, Josh Triplett,
Steven Rostedt, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan, Joel Fernandes,
rcu, linux-kernel
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 08:13:00PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>
>
> On 2022/8/23 0:35, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:42:53AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> >> When CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y or CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, additional
> >> CPUs need to be added to 'rcu_nocb_mask'. But 'rcu_nocb_mask' may be not
> >> available now, due to 'rcu_nocbs' is not specified. Check and initialize
> >> 'rcu_nocb_mask' before using it. This code simplification strictly follows
> >> this logic, compared with old implementations, unnecessary crossovers are
> >> avoided and easy to understand.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> >
> > This looks like a nice simplification, but I will wait for your response
> > on Patch 1/1 before trying it out.
>
> How about I post v5 and just do this simplification? Patch 1/2 seems to require
> further discussion and in-depth analysis, which may take a long time.
Excellent choice, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> >> ---
> >> kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 32 +++++++++-----------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> >> index ff763e7dc53551f..3c59b12f4465af1 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> >> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> >> @@ -1209,44 +1209,30 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_nocb_cpu_offload);
> >> void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
> >> {
> >> int cpu;
> >> - bool need_rcu_nocb_mask = false;
> >> - bool offload_all = false;
> >> struct rcu_data *rdp;
> >> + const struct cpumask *cpumask = NULL;
> >>
> >> #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL)
> >> - if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
> >> - need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
> >> - offload_all = true;
> >> - }
> >> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL) */
> >> -
> >> -#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> >> - if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask)) {
> >> - need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
> >> - offload_all = false; /* NO_HZ_FULL has its own mask. */
> >> - }
> >> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> >> + cpumask = cpu_possible_mask;
> >> +#elif defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> >> + if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask))
> >> + cpumask = tick_nohz_full_mask;
> >> +#endif
> >>
> >> - if (need_rcu_nocb_mask) {
> >> + if (cpumask) {
> >> if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
> >> if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> >> pr_info("rcu_nocb_mask allocation failed, callback offloading disabled.\n");
> >> return;
> >> }
> >> }
> >> +
> >> + cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, cpumask);
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask))
> >> return;
> >>
> >> -#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> >> - if (tick_nohz_full_running)
> >> - cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
> >> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> >> -
> >> - if (offload_all)
> >> - cpumask_setall(rcu_nocb_mask);
> >> -
> >> if (!cpumask_subset(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask)) {
> >> pr_info("\tNote: kernel parameter 'rcu_nocbs=', 'nohz_full', or 'isolcpus=' contains nonexistent CPUs.\n");
> >> cpumask_and(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask,
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >>
> > .
> >
>
> --
> Regards,
> Zhen Lei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-25 16:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-08-17 1:42 [PATCH v4 0/2] rcu/nocb: Delete local variable 'need_rcu_nocb_mask' in rcu_init_nohz() Zhen Lei
2022-08-17 1:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu: Eliminate rcu_state.nocb_is_setup Zhen Lei
2022-08-22 16:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-23 12:00 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-08-17 1:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] rcu: Simplify the code logic of rcu_init_nohz() Zhen Lei
2022-08-22 16:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-23 12:13 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-08-25 16:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®