From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jiaan Lu <jiaan.lu@intel.com>, Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>,
Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 06/11] KVM: x86: Advertise ARCH_CAP_VIRTUAL_ENUM support
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:25:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230414062545.270178-7-chao.gao@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230414062545.270178-1-chao.gao@intel.com>
From: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
Bit 63 of IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR indicates availablility of the
VIRTUAL_ENUMERATION_MSR (index 0x50000000) that enumerates features like
e.g., mitigation enumeration which is used for guest to hint VMMs the
software mitigations in use.
Advertise ARCH_CAP_VIRTUAL_ENUM support for VMX and emulate read/write
of the VIRTUAL_ENUMERATION_MSR. Now VIRTUAL_ENUMERATION_MSR is always 0.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Tested-by: Jiaan Lu <jiaan.lu@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 57f241c5a371..195d0cf9309a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -4093,6 +4093,7 @@ static bool svm_has_emulated_msr(struct kvm *kvm, u32 index)
{
switch (index) {
case MSR_IA32_MCG_EXT_CTL:
+ case MSR_VIRTUAL_ENUMERATION:
case MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC ... MSR_IA32_VMX_VMFUNC:
return false;
case MSR_IA32_SMBASE:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 9f6919bec2b3..85419137decb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -1943,6 +1943,8 @@ static inline bool is_vmx_feature_control_msr_valid(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
return !(msr->data & ~valid_bits);
}
+#define VIRTUAL_ENUMERATION_VALID_BITS 0ULL
+
static int vmx_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
{
switch (msr->index) {
@@ -1950,6 +1952,9 @@ static int vmx_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
if (!nested)
return 1;
return vmx_get_vmx_msr(&vmcs_config.nested, msr->index, &msr->data);
+ case MSR_VIRTUAL_ENUMERATION:
+ msr->data = VIRTUAL_ENUMERATION_VALID_BITS;
+ return 0;
default:
return KVM_MSR_RET_INVALID;
}
@@ -2096,6 +2101,12 @@ static int vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
case MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR:
msr_info->data = vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL);
break;
+ case MSR_VIRTUAL_ENUMERATION:
+ if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
+ !(vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities & ARCH_CAP_VIRTUAL_ENUM))
+ return 1;
+ msr_info->data = vmx->msr_virtual_enumeration;
+ break;
default:
find_uret_msr:
msr = vmx_find_uret_msr(vmx, msr_info->index);
@@ -2437,6 +2448,14 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
}
ret = kvm_set_msr_common(vcpu, msr_info);
break;
+ case MSR_VIRTUAL_ENUMERATION:
+ if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
+ return 1;
+ if (data & ~VIRTUAL_ENUMERATION_VALID_BITS)
+ return 1;
+
+ vmx->msr_virtual_enumeration = data;
+ break;
default:
find_uret_msr:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
index 021d86b52e18..a7faaf9fdc26 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
@@ -292,6 +292,7 @@ struct vcpu_vmx {
u64 spec_ctrl;
u64 guest_spec_ctrl;
+ u64 msr_virtual_enumeration;
u32 msr_ia32_umwait_control;
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 3c58dbae7b4c..a1bc52bebdcc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1537,6 +1537,7 @@ static const u32 emulated_msrs_all[] = {
MSR_K7_HWCR,
MSR_KVM_POLL_CONTROL,
+ MSR_VIRTUAL_ENUMERATION,
};
static u32 emulated_msrs[ARRAY_SIZE(emulated_msrs_all)];
@@ -1570,6 +1571,7 @@ static const u32 msr_based_features_all[] = {
MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV,
MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES,
MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES,
+ MSR_VIRTUAL_ENUMERATION,
};
static u32 msr_based_features[ARRAY_SIZE(msr_based_features_all)];
@@ -1591,7 +1593,8 @@ static unsigned int num_msr_based_features;
ARCH_CAP_SKIP_VMENTRY_L1DFLUSH | ARCH_CAP_SSB_NO | ARCH_CAP_MDS_NO | \
ARCH_CAP_PSCHANGE_MC_NO | ARCH_CAP_TSX_CTRL_MSR | ARCH_CAP_TAA_NO | \
ARCH_CAP_SBDR_SSDP_NO | ARCH_CAP_FBSDP_NO | ARCH_CAP_PSDP_NO | \
- ARCH_CAP_FB_CLEAR | ARCH_CAP_RRSBA | ARCH_CAP_PBRSB_NO)
+ ARCH_CAP_FB_CLEAR | ARCH_CAP_RRSBA | ARCH_CAP_PBRSB_NO | \
+ ARCH_CAP_VIRTUAL_ENUM)
static u64 kvm_get_arch_capabilities(void)
{
@@ -1610,6 +1613,17 @@ static u64 kvm_get_arch_capabilities(void)
*/
data |= ARCH_CAP_PSCHANGE_MC_NO;
+ /*
+ * Virtual enumeration is a paravirt feature. The only usage for now
+ * is to bridge the gap caused by microarchitecture changes between
+ * different Intel processors. And its usage is linked to "virtualize
+ * IA32_SPEC_CTRL" which is a VMX feature. Whether AMD SVM can benefit
+ * from the same usage and how to implement it is still unclear. Limit
+ * virtual enumeration to VMX.
+ */
+ if (static_call(kvm_x86_has_emulated_msr)(NULL, MSR_VIRTUAL_ENUMERATION))
+ data |= ARCH_CAP_VIRTUAL_ENUM;
+
/*
* If we're doing cache flushes (either "always" or "cond")
* we will do one whenever the guest does a vmlaunch/vmresume.
--
2.40.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-14 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-14 6:25 [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] Intel IA32_SPEC_CTRL Virtualization Chao Gao
2023-04-14 6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/11] x86/msr-index: Add bit definitions for BHI_DIS_S and BHI_NO Chao Gao
2023-04-14 9:52 ` Binbin Wu
2023-04-14 6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: x86: Advertise CPUID.7.2.EDX and RRSBA_CTRL support Chao Gao
2023-04-16 7:04 ` Binbin Wu
2023-04-16 13:25 ` Chao Gao
2023-05-15 6:53 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-05-16 2:04 ` Chao Gao
2023-05-16 2:22 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-05-16 3:01 ` Chao Gao
2023-05-16 7:03 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-05-16 9:09 ` Chao Gao
2023-05-18 9:50 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-05-19 9:43 ` Chao Gao
2023-04-14 6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: x86: Advertise BHI_CTRL support Chao Gao
2023-05-15 7:14 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-04-14 6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: VMX: Add IA32_SPEC_CTRL virtualization support Chao Gao
2023-04-17 3:17 ` Binbin Wu
2023-04-18 2:07 ` Chao Gao
2023-04-17 6:48 ` Chenyi Qiang
2023-04-17 7:31 ` Chao Gao
2023-05-16 7:16 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-05-16 9:20 ` Chao Gao
2023-04-14 6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/11] x86/bugs: Use Virtual MSRs to request hardware mitigations Chao Gao
2023-04-17 13:43 ` Binbin Wu
2023-04-18 2:01 ` Chao Gao
2023-04-14 6:25 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2023-05-18 10:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/11] KVM: x86: Advertise ARCH_CAP_VIRTUAL_ENUM support Xiaoyao Li
2023-05-19 9:57 ` Chao Gao
2023-05-22 1:02 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-04-14 6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/11] KVM: VMX: Advertise MITIGATION_CTRL support Chao Gao
2023-04-14 6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/11] KVM: VMX: Advertise MITI_ENUM_RETPOLINE_S_SUPPORT Chao Gao
2023-05-18 10:25 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-05-19 10:26 ` Chao Gao
2023-05-22 9:43 ` Liu, Jingqi
2023-04-14 6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] KVM: VMX: Advertise MITI_CTRL_BHB_CLEAR_SEQ_S_SUPPORT Chao Gao
2023-05-22 9:41 ` Liu, Jingqi
2023-04-14 6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/11] KVM: selftests: Add tests for virtual enumeration/mitigation MSRs Chao Gao
2023-05-22 9:39 ` Liu, Jingqi
2023-04-14 6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/11] KVM: selftests: Add tests for IA32_SPEC_CTRL MSR Chao Gao
2023-04-14 9:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] Intel IA32_SPEC_CTRL Virtualization Binbin Wu
2023-04-14 22:10 ` Pawan Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230414062545.270178-7-chao.gao@intel.com \
--to=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chen.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiaan.lu@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®