mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	rafael@kernel.org
Cc: lukasz.luba@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rui.zhang@intel.com, amit.kucheria@verdurent.com,
	amit.kachhap@gmail.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org, len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
	Pierre.Gondois@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com,
	mhiramat@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 03/12] PM: EM: Refactor em_pd_get_efficient_state() to be more flexible
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 16:50:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230721155022.2339982-4-lukasz.luba@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230721155022.2339982-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>

The Energy Model (EM) is going to support runtime modification. There
are going to be 2 EM tables which store information. This patch aims
to prepare the code to be generic and use one of the tables. The function
will no longer get a pointer to 'struct em_perf_domain' (the EM) but instead
a pointer to 'struct em_perf_state' (which is one of the EM's tables).

Prepare em_pd_get_efficient_state() for the upcoming changes and
make it possible to re-use. Return an index for the best performance
state for a given EM table. The function arguments that are introduced
should allow to work on different performance state arrays. The caller of
em_pd_get_efficient_state() should be able to use the index either
on the default or the modifiable EM table.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
---
 include/linux/energy_model.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
index b9caa01dfac4..8069f526c9d8 100644
--- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
+++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h
@@ -175,33 +175,35 @@ void em_dev_unregister_perf_domain(struct device *dev);
 
 /**
  * em_pd_get_efficient_state() - Get an efficient performance state from the EM
- * @pd   : Performance domain for which we want an efficient frequency
- * @freq : Frequency to map with the EM
+ * @state:		List of performance states, in ascending order
+ * @nr_perf_states:	Number of performance states
+ * @freq:		Frequency to map with the EM
+ * @pd_flags:		Performance Domain flags
  *
  * It is called from the scheduler code quite frequently and as a consequence
  * doesn't implement any check.
  *
- * Return: An efficient performance state, high enough to meet @freq
+ * Return: An efficient performance state id, high enough to meet @freq
  * requirement.
  */
-static inline
-struct em_perf_state *em_pd_get_efficient_state(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
-						unsigned long freq)
+static inline int
+em_pd_get_efficient_state(struct em_perf_state *table, int nr_perf_states,
+			  unsigned long freq, unsigned long pd_flags)
 {
 	struct em_perf_state *ps;
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_perf_states; i++) {
-		ps = &pd->table[i];
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_perf_states; i++) {
+		ps = &table[i];
 		if (ps->frequency >= freq) {
-			if (pd->flags & EM_PERF_DOMAIN_SKIP_INEFFICIENCIES &&
+			if (pd_flags & EM_PERF_DOMAIN_SKIP_INEFFICIENCIES &&
 			    ps->flags & EM_PERF_STATE_INEFFICIENT)
 				continue;
-			break;
+			return i;
 		}
 	}
 
-	return ps;
+	return nr_perf_states - 1;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -226,7 +228,7 @@ static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
 {
 	unsigned long freq, scale_cpu;
 	struct em_perf_state *ps;
-	int cpu;
+	int cpu, i;
 
 	if (!sum_util)
 		return 0;
@@ -251,7 +253,9 @@ static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
 	 * Find the lowest performance state of the Energy Model above the
 	 * requested frequency.
 	 */
-	ps = em_pd_get_efficient_state(pd, freq);
+	i = em_pd_get_efficient_state(pd->table, pd->nr_perf_states, freq,
+				      pd->flags);
+	ps = &pd->table[i];
 
 	/*
 	 * The capacity of a CPU in the domain at the performance state (ps)
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-21 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-21 15:50 [PATCH v3 00/12] Introduce runtime modifiable Energy Model Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] PM: EM: Refactor em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies() arguments Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] PM: EM: Find first CPU online while updating OPP efficiency Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] PM: EM: Refactor a new function em_compute_costs() Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] PM: EM: Check if the get_cost() callback is present in em_compute_costs() Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] PM: EM: Refactor struct em_perf_domain and add default_table Lukasz Luba
2023-08-16 13:04   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-08-21 15:22     ` Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] PM: EM: Add update_power() callback for runtime modifications Lukasz Luba
2023-08-16 13:04   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-08-21 15:23     ` Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] PM: EM: Introduce runtime modifiable table Lukasz Luba
2023-08-16 13:05   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-08-21 15:25     ` Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] PM: EM: Add RCU mechanism which safely cleans the old data Lukasz Luba
2023-08-16 13:06   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-08-21 15:30     ` Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] PM: EM: Add runtime update interface to modify EM power Lukasz Luba
2023-08-16 13:07   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-08-21 15:33     ` Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] PM: EM: Use runtime modified EM for CPUs energy estimation in EAS Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] Documentation: EM: Update with runtime modification design Lukasz Luba
2023-08-16 13:08   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-08-21 16:13     ` Lukasz Luba
2023-08-16 13:00 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] Introduce runtime modifiable Energy Model Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230721155022.2339982-4-lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=Pierre.Gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®