mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	rafael@kernel.org
Cc: rui.zhang@intel.com, amit.kucheria@verdurent.com,
	amit.kachhap@gmail.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org, len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
	Pierre.Gondois@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com,
	mhiramat@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/12] PM: EM: Add RCU mechanism which safely cleans the old data
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 15:06:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e324df5d-a4c1-43f3-5e45-95dc591085ac@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230721155022.2339982-10-lukasz.luba@arm.com>

On 21/07/2023 17:50, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> The EM is going to support runtime modifications of the power data.
> Introduce RCU safe mechanism to clean up the old allocated EM data.
> It also adds a mutex for the EM structure to serialize the modifiers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/power/energy_model.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> index c2f8a0046f8a..4596bfe7398e 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
>   */
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(em_pd_mutex);
>  
> +static void em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(struct device *dev,
> +					   struct em_perf_state *table);
> +
>  static bool _is_cpu_device(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	return (dev->bus == &cpu_subsys);
> @@ -104,6 +107,45 @@ static void em_debug_create_pd(struct device *dev) {}
>  static void em_debug_remove_pd(struct device *dev) {}
>  #endif
>  
> +static void em_destroy_rt_table_rcu(struct rcu_head *rp)
> +{
> +	struct em_perf_table *runtime_table;
> +
> +	runtime_table = container_of(rp, struct em_perf_table, rcu);
> +	kfree(runtime_table->state);
> +	kfree(runtime_table);
> +}
> +
> +static void em_destroy_tmp_setup_rcu(struct rcu_head *rp)
> +{
> +	struct em_perf_table *runtime_table;
> +
> +	runtime_table = container_of(rp, struct em_perf_table, rcu);
> +	kfree(runtime_table);
> +}

Still don't like that we have to have 2 rcu callbacks here. In case we
could assign default_table to runtime_table in em_create_pd() (and not
just default_table->state to runtime_table->state) IMHO we would only
need one rcu callback?

-->8--

-static void em_destroy_tmp_setup_rcu(struct rcu_head *rp)
-{
-       struct em_perf_table *runtime_table;
-
-       runtime_table = container_of(rp, struct em_perf_table, rcu);
-       kfree(runtime_table);
-}
-
 static void em_perf_runtime_table_set(struct device *dev,
                                      struct em_perf_table *runtime_table)
 {
@@ -136,13 +128,8 @@ static void em_perf_runtime_table_set(struct device *dev,
 
        em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(dev, runtime_table->state);
 
-       /*
-        * Check if the 'state' array is not actually the one from setup.
-        * If it is then don't free it.
-        */
-       if (tmp->state == pd->default_table->state)
-               call_rcu(&tmp->rcu, em_destroy_tmp_setup_rcu);
-       else
+       /* Don't free default table (inital value of runtime table) */
+       if (tmp != pd->default_table)
                call_rcu(&tmp->rcu, em_destroy_rt_table_rcu);
 }
 
@@ -349,7 +336,6 @@ static int em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states,
                        unsigned long flags)
 {
        struct em_perf_table *default_table;
-       struct em_perf_table *runtime_table;
        struct em_perf_domain *pd;
        struct device *cpu_dev;
        int cpu, ret, num_cpus;
@@ -382,24 +368,15 @@ static int em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states,
 
        pd->default_table = default_table;
 
-       runtime_table = kzalloc(sizeof(*runtime_table), GFP_KERNEL);
-       if (!runtime_table) {
-               kfree(default_table);
-               kfree(pd);
-               return -ENOMEM;
-       }
-
        ret = em_create_perf_table(dev, pd, nr_states, cb, flags);
        if (ret) {
                kfree(default_table);
-               kfree(runtime_table);
                kfree(pd);
                return ret;
        }
 
-       /* Re-use temporally (till 1st modification) the memory */
-       runtime_table->state = default_table->state;
-       rcu_assign_pointer(pd->runtime_table, runtime_table);
+       /* Initialize runtime table as default table */
+       rcu_assign_pointer(pd->runtime_table, default_table);
 
        if (_is_cpu_device(dev))
                for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {




  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-16 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-21 15:50 [PATCH v3 00/12] Introduce runtime modifiable Energy Model Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] PM: EM: Refactor em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies() arguments Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] PM: EM: Find first CPU online while updating OPP efficiency Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] PM: EM: Refactor em_pd_get_efficient_state() to be more flexible Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] PM: EM: Refactor a new function em_compute_costs() Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] PM: EM: Check if the get_cost() callback is present in em_compute_costs() Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] PM: EM: Refactor struct em_perf_domain and add default_table Lukasz Luba
2023-08-16 13:04   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-08-21 15:22     ` Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] PM: EM: Add update_power() callback for runtime modifications Lukasz Luba
2023-08-16 13:04   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-08-21 15:23     ` Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] PM: EM: Introduce runtime modifiable table Lukasz Luba
2023-08-16 13:05   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-08-21 15:25     ` Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] PM: EM: Add RCU mechanism which safely cleans the old data Lukasz Luba
2023-08-16 13:06   ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2023-08-21 15:30     ` Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] PM: EM: Add runtime update interface to modify EM power Lukasz Luba
2023-08-16 13:07   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-08-21 15:33     ` Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] PM: EM: Use runtime modified EM for CPUs energy estimation in EAS Lukasz Luba
2023-07-21 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] Documentation: EM: Update with runtime modification design Lukasz Luba
2023-08-16 13:08   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-08-21 16:13     ` Lukasz Luba
2023-08-16 13:00 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] Introduce runtime modifiable Energy Model Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e324df5d-a4c1-43f3-5e45-95dc591085ac@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=Pierre.Gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®