From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v3 05/30] ARM: process: Remove local restart
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 10:41:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250107-arm-generic-entry-v3-5-4e5f3c15db2d@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250107-arm-generic-entry-v3-0-4e5f3c15db2d@linaro.org>
The ARM kernel contains a quirk to handle syscall restarts
inside the kernel without exiting to userspace. The generic
entry cannot handle this.
Rename do_signal() to arch_do_signal_or_restart() to fit
with the upcoming generic entry conversion.
This is essentially a revert of commit 81783786d5cf
"ARM: 7473/1: deal with handlerless restarts without leaving the kernel"
from 2012.
Other solutions may be possible, such as checking the PC after
do_work_pending and assume it is a local restart if that address
is inside the kernel, or modifying the generic entry code to
track local restarts like ARM does and pass that information
back.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/signal.h | 3 +--
arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S | 9 +--------
arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 28 +++++++++-------------------
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/signal.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/signal.h
index 8b84092d151800cb4076672d1c31f0a83777d0d8..7acccc96840c8a17744cc3f2894f19d142aba4fd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/signal.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/signal.h
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ typedef struct {
#include <asm/sigcontext.h>
void do_rseq_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs);
-int do_work_pending(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int thread_flags,
- int syscall);
+void do_work_pending(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int thread_flags);
#endif
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S
index df6961a1006b7a0f3522728812bf52ccb849e511..da5c2d4b62e56cce644b15e329ab4149d69c5b79 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S
@@ -86,14 +86,8 @@ ENDPROC(ret_fast_syscall)
bne __sys_trace_return_nosave
slow_work_pending:
mov r0, sp @ 'regs'
- mov r2, why @ 'syscall'
bl do_work_pending
- cmp r0, #0
- beq no_work_pending
- movlt scno, #(__NR_restart_syscall - __NR_SYSCALL_BASE)
- str scno, [tsk, #TI_ABI_SYSCALL] @ make sure tracers see update
- ldmia sp, {r0 - r6} @ have to reload r0 - r6
- b local_restart @ ... and off we go
+ b no_work_pending
ENDPROC(ret_fast_syscall)
/*
@@ -266,7 +260,6 @@ ENTRY(vector_swi)
*/
TRACE( ldmia sp, {r0 - r3} )
-local_restart:
ldr r10, [tsk, #TI_FLAGS] @ check for syscall tracing
stmdb sp!, {r4, r5} @ push fifth and sixth args
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
index 79a6730fa0eb7d6581343bdbbeb6834dcaabb9f8..7b1a16e86b236575efdc29cda9b751e8e2a3f64e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <asm/traps.h>
#include <asm/unistd.h>
#include <asm/vfp.h>
+#include <asm/syscall.h>
#include <asm/syscalls.h>
#include "signal.h"
@@ -534,9 +535,10 @@ static void handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
* the kernel can handle, and then we build all the user-level signal handling
* stack-frames in one go after that.
*/
-static int do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, int syscall)
+static void arch_do_signal_or_restart(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned int retval = 0, continue_addr = 0, restart_addr = 0;
+ bool syscall = (syscall_get_nr(current, regs) != -1);
struct ksignal ksig;
int restart = 0;
@@ -590,16 +592,14 @@ static int do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, int syscall)
} else {
/* no handler */
restore_saved_sigmask();
- if (unlikely(restart) && regs->ARM_pc == restart_addr) {
+ if (unlikely(restart) && regs->ARM_pc == restart_addr)
regs->ARM_pc = continue_addr;
- return restart;
- }
}
- return 0;
+ return;
}
-asmlinkage int
-do_work_pending(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int thread_flags, int syscall)
+asmlinkage void
+do_work_pending(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int thread_flags)
{
/*
* The assembly code enters us with IRQs off, but it hasn't
@@ -612,19 +612,10 @@ do_work_pending(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int thread_flags, int syscall)
schedule();
} else {
if (unlikely(!user_mode(regs)))
- return 0;
+ return;
local_irq_enable();
if (thread_flags & (_TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)) {
- int restart = do_signal(regs, syscall);
- if (unlikely(restart)) {
- /*
- * Restart without handlers.
- * Deal with it without leaving
- * the kernel space.
- */
- return restart;
- }
- syscall = 0;
+ arch_do_signal_or_restart(regs);
} else if (thread_flags & _TIF_UPROBE) {
uprobe_notify_resume(regs);
} else {
@@ -634,7 +625,6 @@ do_work_pending(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int thread_flags, int syscall)
local_irq_disable();
thread_flags = read_thread_flags();
} while (thread_flags & _TIF_WORK_MASK);
- return 0;
}
struct page *get_signal_page(void)
--
2.47.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-07 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-07 9:41 [PATCH RFC v3 00/30] ARM: Switch to generic entry Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 01/30] ARM: Prepare includes for " Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 02/30] ARM: ptrace: Split report_syscall() Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 03/30] ARM: entry: Skip ret_slow_syscall label Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 04/30] ARM: process: Rewrite ret_from_fork i C Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 06/30] ARM: entry: Invoke syscalls using C Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 07/30] ARM: entry: Rewrite two asm calls in C Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 08/30] ARM: entry: Move trace entry to C function Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 09/30] ARM: entry: save the syscall sp in thread_info Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 10/30] ARM: entry: move all tracing invocation to C Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 11/30] ARM: entry: Merge the common and trace entry code Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 12/30] ARM: entry: Rename syscall invocation Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 13/30] ARM: entry: Create user_mode_enter/exit Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 14/30] ARM: entry: Drop trace argument from usr_entry macro Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 15/30] ARM: entry: Separate call path for syscall SWI entry Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 16/30] ARM: entry: Drop argument to asm_irqentry macros Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 17/30] ARM: entry: Implement syscall_exit_to_user_mode() Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 18/30] ARM: entry: Drop the superfast ret_fast_syscall Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 19/30] ARM: entry: Remove fast and offset register restore Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 20/30] ARM: entry: Untangle ret_fast_syscall/to_user Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 21/30] ARM: entry: Do not double-call exit functions Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 22/30] ARM: entry: Move work processing to C Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 23/30] ARM: entry: Stop exiting syscalls like IRQs Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 24/30] ARM: entry: Complete syscall and IRQ transition to C Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 25/30] ARM: entry: Create irqentry calls from kernel mode Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 26/30] ARM: entry: Move in-kernel hardirq tracing to C Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 27/30] ARM: irq: Add irqstack helpers Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 28/30] ARM: entry: Convert to generic entry Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 29/30] ARM: entry: Handle prefetch and data aborts as interrupts Linus Walleij
2025-01-07 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v3 30/30] RFC: ARM: entry: Block IRQs in early IRQ context Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250107-arm-generic-entry-v3-5-4e5f3c15db2d@linaro.org \
--to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®