From: David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Derek Manwaring <derekmn@amazon.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 16/36] x86/bugs: Restructure srso mitigation
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 11:40:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250310164023.779191-17-david.kaplan@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250310164023.779191-1-david.kaplan@amd.com>
Restructure srso to use select/update/apply functions to create
consistent vulnerability handling. Like with retbleed, the command line
options directly select mitigations which can later be modified.
Also fix the ibpb-vmexit case to look at CONFIG_MITIGATION_IBPB_ENTRY
instead of CONFIG_MITIGATION_SRSO.
Signed-off-by: David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 213 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index b9b7f5967f1e..d48b0a941b2d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ static void __init srbds_select_mitigation(void);
static void __init srbds_apply_mitigation(void);
static void __init l1d_flush_select_mitigation(void);
static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void);
+static void __init srso_update_mitigation(void);
+static void __init srso_apply_mitigation(void);
static void __init gds_select_mitigation(void);
static void __init gds_apply_mitigation(void);
static void __init bhi_select_mitigation(void);
@@ -204,11 +206,6 @@ void __init cpu_select_mitigations(void)
rfds_select_mitigation();
srbds_select_mitigation();
l1d_flush_select_mitigation();
-
- /*
- * srso_select_mitigation() depends and must run after
- * retbleed_select_mitigation().
- */
srso_select_mitigation();
gds_select_mitigation();
bhi_select_mitigation();
@@ -229,6 +226,8 @@ void __init cpu_select_mitigations(void)
taa_update_mitigation();
mmio_update_mitigation();
rfds_update_mitigation();
+ /* srso_update_mitigation() relies on retbleed_mitigation. */
+ srso_update_mitigation();
spectre_v1_apply_mitigation();
spectre_v2_apply_mitigation();
@@ -241,6 +240,7 @@ void __init cpu_select_mitigations(void)
mmio_apply_mitigation();
rfds_apply_mitigation();
srbds_apply_mitigation();
+ srso_apply_mitigation();
gds_apply_mitigation();
bhi_apply_mitigation();
}
@@ -2690,6 +2690,7 @@ early_param("l1tf", l1tf_cmdline);
enum srso_mitigation {
SRSO_MITIGATION_NONE,
+ SRSO_MITIGATION_AUTO,
SRSO_MITIGATION_UCODE_NEEDED,
SRSO_MITIGATION_SAFE_RET_UCODE_NEEDED,
SRSO_MITIGATION_MICROCODE,
@@ -2699,14 +2700,6 @@ enum srso_mitigation {
SRSO_MITIGATION_BP_SPEC_REDUCE,
};
-enum srso_mitigation_cmd {
- SRSO_CMD_OFF,
- SRSO_CMD_MICROCODE,
- SRSO_CMD_SAFE_RET,
- SRSO_CMD_IBPB,
- SRSO_CMD_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT,
-};
-
static const char * const srso_strings[] = {
[SRSO_MITIGATION_NONE] = "Vulnerable",
[SRSO_MITIGATION_UCODE_NEEDED] = "Vulnerable: No microcode",
@@ -2718,8 +2711,7 @@ static const char * const srso_strings[] = {
[SRSO_MITIGATION_BP_SPEC_REDUCE] = "Mitigation: Reduced Speculation"
};
-static enum srso_mitigation srso_mitigation __ro_after_init = SRSO_MITIGATION_NONE;
-static enum srso_mitigation_cmd srso_cmd __ro_after_init = SRSO_CMD_SAFE_RET;
+static enum srso_mitigation srso_mitigation __ro_after_init = SRSO_MITIGATION_AUTO;
static int __init srso_parse_cmdline(char *str)
{
@@ -2727,15 +2719,15 @@ static int __init srso_parse_cmdline(char *str)
return -EINVAL;
if (!strcmp(str, "off"))
- srso_cmd = SRSO_CMD_OFF;
+ srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_NONE;
else if (!strcmp(str, "microcode"))
- srso_cmd = SRSO_CMD_MICROCODE;
+ srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_MICROCODE;
else if (!strcmp(str, "safe-ret"))
- srso_cmd = SRSO_CMD_SAFE_RET;
+ srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_SAFE_RET;
else if (!strcmp(str, "ibpb"))
- srso_cmd = SRSO_CMD_IBPB;
+ srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_IBPB;
else if (!strcmp(str, "ibpb-vmexit"))
- srso_cmd = SRSO_CMD_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT;
+ srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT;
else
pr_err("Ignoring unknown SRSO option (%s).", str);
@@ -2749,130 +2741,75 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void)
{
bool has_microcode = boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_BRTYPE);
- if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SRSO) ||
- cpu_mitigations_off() ||
- srso_cmd == SRSO_CMD_OFF) {
- if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SBPB))
- x86_pred_cmd = PRED_CMD_SBPB;
- goto out;
- }
+ if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SRSO) || cpu_mitigations_off())
+ srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_NONE;
+
+ if (srso_mitigation == SRSO_MITIGATION_NONE)
+ return;
+
+ if (srso_mitigation == SRSO_MITIGATION_AUTO)
+ srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_SAFE_RET;
if (has_microcode) {
/*
* Zen1/2 with SMT off aren't vulnerable after the right
* IBPB microcode has been applied.
- *
- * Zen1/2 don't have SBPB, no need to try to enable it here.
*/
if (boot_cpu_data.x86 < 0x19 && !cpu_smt_possible()) {
setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SRSO_NO);
- goto out;
- }
-
- if (retbleed_mitigation == RETBLEED_MITIGATION_IBPB) {
- srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_IBPB;
- goto out;
+ srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_NONE;
+ return;
}
} else {
pr_warn("IBPB-extending microcode not applied!\n");
pr_warn(SRSO_NOTICE);
-
- /* may be overwritten by SRSO_CMD_SAFE_RET below */
- srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_UCODE_NEEDED;
}
- switch (srso_cmd) {
- case SRSO_CMD_MICROCODE:
- if (has_microcode) {
- srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_MICROCODE;
- pr_warn(SRSO_NOTICE);
- }
- break;
-
- case SRSO_CMD_SAFE_RET:
- if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SRSO_USER_KERNEL_NO))
- goto ibpb_on_vmexit;
-
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MITIGATION_SRSO)) {
- /*
- * Enable the return thunk for generated code
- * like ftrace, static_call, etc.
- */
- setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK);
- setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_UNRET);
-
- if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x19) {
- setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SRSO_ALIAS);
- x86_return_thunk = srso_alias_return_thunk;
- } else {
- setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SRSO);
- x86_return_thunk = srso_return_thunk;
- }
- if (has_microcode)
- srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_SAFE_RET;
- else
- srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_SAFE_RET_UCODE_NEEDED;
- } else {
+ switch (srso_mitigation) {
+ case SRSO_MITIGATION_SAFE_RET:
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MITIGATION_SRSO))
pr_err("WARNING: kernel not compiled with MITIGATION_SRSO.\n");
+ else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SRSO_USER_KERNEL_NO)) {
+ srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT;
+ goto ibpb_on_vmexit;
}
- break;
- case SRSO_CMD_IBPB:
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MITIGATION_IBPB_ENTRY)) {
- if (has_microcode) {
- setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_ENTRY_IBPB);
- setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT);
- srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_IBPB;
-
- /*
- * IBPB on entry already obviates the need for
- * software-based untraining so clear those in case some
- * other mitigation like Retbleed has selected them.
- */
- setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_UNRET);
- setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK);
-
- /*
- * There is no need for RSB filling: entry_ibpb() ensures
- * all predictions, including the RSB, are invalidated,
- * regardless of IBPB implementation.
- */
- setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT);
- }
- } else {
- pr_err("WARNING: kernel not compiled with MITIGATION_IBPB_ENTRY.\n");
- }
+ if (!has_microcode)
+ srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_SAFE_RET_UCODE_NEEDED;
break;
-
ibpb_on_vmexit:
- case SRSO_CMD_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT:
+ case SRSO_MITIGATION_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT:
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SRSO_BP_SPEC_REDUCE)) {
pr_notice("Reducing speculation to address VM/HV SRSO attack vector.\n");
srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_BP_SPEC_REDUCE;
break;
}
-
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MITIGATION_IBPB_ENTRY)) {
- if (has_microcode) {
- setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT);
- srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT;
-
- /*
- * There is no need for RSB filling: entry_ibpb() ensures
- * all predictions, including the RSB, are invalidated,
- * regardless of IBPB implementation.
- */
- setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT);
- }
- } else {
+ fallthrough;
+ case SRSO_MITIGATION_IBPB:
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MITIGATION_IBPB_ENTRY))
pr_err("WARNING: kernel not compiled with MITIGATION_IBPB_ENTRY.\n");
- }
+
+ if (!has_microcode)
+ srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_UCODE_NEEDED;
break;
default:
break;
}
+}
-out:
+static void __init srso_update_mitigation(void)
+{
+ /* If retbleed is using IBPB, that works for SRSO as well */
+ if (retbleed_mitigation == RETBLEED_MITIGATION_IBPB &&
+ boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_BRTYPE))
+ srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_IBPB;
+
+ if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SRSO) && !cpu_mitigations_off())
+ pr_info("%s\n", srso_strings[srso_mitigation]);
+}
+
+static void __init srso_apply_mitigation(void)
+{
/*
* Clear the feature flag if this mitigation is not selected as that
* feature flag controls the BpSpecReduce MSR bit toggling in KVM.
@@ -2880,8 +2817,52 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void)
if (srso_mitigation != SRSO_MITIGATION_BP_SPEC_REDUCE)
setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SRSO_BP_SPEC_REDUCE);
- if (srso_mitigation != SRSO_MITIGATION_NONE)
- pr_info("%s\n", srso_strings[srso_mitigation]);
+ if (srso_mitigation == SRSO_MITIGATION_NONE) {
+ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SBPB))
+ x86_pred_cmd = PRED_CMD_SBPB;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ switch (srso_mitigation) {
+ case SRSO_MITIGATION_SAFE_RET:
+ case SRSO_MITIGATION_SAFE_RET_UCODE_NEEDED:
+ /*
+ * Enable the return thunk for generated code
+ * like ftrace, static_call, etc.
+ */
+ setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK);
+ setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_UNRET);
+
+ if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x19) {
+ setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SRSO_ALIAS);
+ x86_return_thunk = srso_alias_return_thunk;
+ } else {
+ setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SRSO);
+ x86_return_thunk = srso_return_thunk;
+ }
+ break;
+ case SRSO_MITIGATION_IBPB:
+ setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_ENTRY_IBPB);
+ /*
+ * IBPB on entry already obviates the need for
+ * software-based untraining so clear those in case some
+ * other mitigation like Retbleed has selected them.
+ */
+ setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_UNRET);
+ setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK);
+ fallthrough;
+ case SRSO_MITIGATION_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT:
+ setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT);
+ /*
+ * There is no need for RSB filling: entry_ibpb() ensures
+ * all predictions, including the RSB, are invalidated,
+ * regardless of IBPB implementation.
+ */
+ setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
}
#undef pr_fmt
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-10 16:39 [PATCH v4 00/36] Attack vector controls David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:39 ` [PATCH v4 01/36] x86/bugs: Restructure mds mitigation David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:39 ` [PATCH v4 02/36] x86/bugs: Restructure taa mitigation David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:39 ` [PATCH v4 03/36] x86/bugs: Restructure mmio mitigation David Kaplan
2025-03-13 9:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-13 14:19 ` Kaplan, David
2025-03-13 19:26 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-03-18 14:16 ` MMIO and VERW Borislav Petkov
2025-03-18 16:25 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-03-18 16:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-18 16:56 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-03-18 17:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-18 18:15 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-03-18 18:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-24 9:29 ` [PATCH v4 03/36] x86/bugs: Restructure mmio mitigation Borislav Petkov
2025-03-24 17:41 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-03-25 11:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-10 16:39 ` [PATCH v4 04/36] x86/bugs: Restructure rfds mitigation David Kaplan
2025-04-10 16:24 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-14 19:10 ` Kaplan, David
2025-03-10 16:39 ` [PATCH v4 05/36] x86/bugs: Remove md_clear_*_mitigation() David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:39 ` [PATCH v4 06/36] x86/bugs: Restructure srbds mitigation David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:39 ` [PATCH v4 07/36] x86/bugs: Restructure gds mitigation David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:39 ` [PATCH v4 08/36] x86/bugs: Restructure spectre_v1 mitigation David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:39 ` [PATCH v4 09/36] x86/bugs: Only allow retbleed=stuff on Intel David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:39 ` [PATCH v4 10/36] x86/bugs: Restructure retbleed mitigation David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:39 ` [PATCH v4 11/36] x86/bugs: Restructure spectre_v2_user mitigation David Kaplan
2025-03-12 9:49 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-10 16:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-14 19:20 ` Kaplan, David
2025-04-10 16:41 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-14 19:20 ` Kaplan, David
2025-04-14 23:48 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-15 14:56 ` Kaplan, David
2025-03-10 16:39 ` [PATCH v4 12/36] x86/bugs: Restructure bhi mitigation David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 13/36] x86/bugs: Restructure spectre_v2 mitigation David Kaplan
2025-04-10 17:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-14 19:25 ` Kaplan, David
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 14/36] x86/bugs: Restructure ssb mitigation David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 15/36] x86/bugs: Restructure l1tf mitigation David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` David Kaplan [this message]
2025-04-10 17:38 ` [PATCH v4 16/36] x86/bugs: Restructure srso mitigation Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-14 21:12 ` Kaplan, David
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 17/36] Documentation/x86: Document the new attack vector controls David Kaplan
2025-04-10 18:14 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-14 21:15 ` Kaplan, David
2025-04-14 23:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-15 14:59 ` Kaplan, David
2025-04-15 15:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-15 16:10 ` Kaplan, David
2025-04-15 16:47 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-15 17:06 ` Kaplan, David
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 18/36] cpu: Define attack vectors David Kaplan
2025-04-10 18:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-14 21:20 ` Kaplan, David
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 19/36] x86/Kconfig: Arch attack vector support David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 20/36] x86/bugs: Determine relevant vulnerabilities based on attack vector controls David Kaplan
2025-03-12 11:32 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 21/36] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for mds David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 22/36] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for taa David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 23/36] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for mmio David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 24/36] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for rfds David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 25/36] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for srbds David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 26/36] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for gds David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 27/36] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for spectre_v1 David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 28/36] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for retbleed David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 29/36] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for spectre_v2_user David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 30/36] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for bhi David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 31/36] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for spectre_v2 David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 32/36] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for l1tf David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 33/36] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for srso David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 34/36] x86/pti: Add attack vector controls for pti David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 35/36] x86/bugs: Print enabled attack vectors David Kaplan
2025-03-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 36/36] cpu: Show attack vectors in sysfs David Kaplan
2025-03-10 18:45 ` [PATCH v4 00/36] Attack vector controls Ingo Molnar
2025-03-10 20:46 ` Kaplan, David
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250310164023.779191-17-david.kaplan@amd.com \
--to=david.kaplan@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=derekmn@amazon.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®