From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, clm@meta.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 11:45:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250520101727.507378961@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520094538.086709102@infradead.org>
Chris reported that commit 5f6bd380c7bd ("sched/rt: Remove default
bandwidth control") caused a significant dip in his favourite
benchmark of the day. Simply disabling dl_server cured things.
His workload hammers the 0->1, 1->0 transitions, and the
dl_server_{start,stop}() overhead kills it -- fairly obviously a bad
idea in hind sight and all that.
Change things around to only disable the dl_server when there has not
been a fair task around for a whole period. Since the default period
is 1 second, this ensures the benchmark never trips this, overhead
gone.
Fixes: 557a6bfc662c ("sched/fair: Add trivial fair server")
Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -702,6 +702,7 @@ struct sched_dl_entity {
unsigned int dl_defer : 1;
unsigned int dl_defer_armed : 1;
unsigned int dl_defer_running : 1;
+ unsigned int dl_server_idle : 1;
/*
* Bandwidth enforcement timer. Each -deadline task has its
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1215,6 +1215,8 @@ static void __push_dl_task(struct rq *rq
/* a defer timer will not be reset if the runtime consumed was < dl_server_min_res */
static const u64 dl_server_min_res = 1 * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
+static bool dl_server_stopped(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se);
+
static enum hrtimer_restart dl_server_timer(struct hrtimer *timer, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
{
struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_se(dl_se);
@@ -1234,6 +1236,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_server_ti
if (!dl_se->server_has_tasks(dl_se)) {
replenish_dl_entity(dl_se);
+ dl_server_stopped(dl_se);
return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
}
@@ -1639,8 +1642,10 @@ void dl_server_update_idle_time(struct r
void dl_server_update(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64 delta_exec)
{
/* 0 runtime = fair server disabled */
- if (dl_se->dl_runtime)
+ if (dl_se->dl_runtime) {
+ dl_se->dl_server_idle = 0;
update_curr_dl_se(dl_se->rq, dl_se, delta_exec);
+ }
}
void dl_server_start(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
@@ -1663,7 +1668,7 @@ void dl_server_start(struct sched_dl_ent
setup_new_dl_entity(dl_se);
}
- if (!dl_se->dl_runtime)
+ if (!dl_se->dl_runtime || dl_se->dl_server_active)
return;
dl_se->dl_server_active = 1;
@@ -1672,7 +1677,7 @@ void dl_server_start(struct sched_dl_ent
resched_curr(dl_se->rq);
}
-void dl_server_stop(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
+static void __dl_server_stop(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
{
if (!dl_se->dl_runtime)
return;
@@ -1684,6 +1689,24 @@ void dl_server_stop(struct sched_dl_enti
dl_se->dl_server_active = 0;
}
+static bool dl_server_stopped(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
+{
+ if (!dl_se->dl_server_active)
+ return false;
+
+ if (dl_se->dl_server_idle) {
+ __dl_server_stop(dl_se);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ dl_se->dl_server_idle = 1;
+ return false;
+}
+
+void dl_server_stop(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
+{
+}
+
void dl_server_init(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct rq *rq,
dl_server_has_tasks_f has_tasks,
dl_server_pick_f pick_task)
@@ -2435,7 +2458,7 @@ static struct task_struct *__pick_task_d
if (dl_server(dl_se)) {
p = dl_se->server_pick_task(dl_se);
if (!p) {
- if (dl_server_active(dl_se)) {
+ if (!dl_server_stopped(dl_se)) {
dl_se->dl_yielded = 1;
update_curr_dl_se(rq, dl_se, 0);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-20 9:45 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] sched: Try and address some recent-ish regressions Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-06-03 16:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling Juri Lelli
2025-06-13 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] sched: Optimize ttwu() / select_task_rq() Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-09 5:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2025-06-13 9:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 10:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched: Split up ttwu_runnable() Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] sched: Add ttwu_queue controls Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched: Add ttwu_queue support for delayed tasks Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-06 15:03 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-06-06 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-06 16:55 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-06-11 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 12:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-06-06 16:18 ` Phil Auld
2025-06-16 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 16:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 7:34 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-06-13 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 8:16 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-05-28 19:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] sched: Try and address some recent-ish regressions Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-29 1:41 ` Chris Mason
2025-06-14 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 0:35 ` Chris Mason
2025-05-29 10:18 ` Beata Michalska
2025-05-30 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-30 10:04 ` Chris Mason
2025-06-02 4:44 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-13 3:28 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-14 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250520101727.507378961@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®