From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, clm@meta.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] sched: Add ttwu_queue controls
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 11:45:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250520101727.874587738@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520094538.086709102@infradead.org>
There are two (soon three) callers of ttwu_queue_wakelist(),
distinguish them with their own WF_ and add some knobs on.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
kernel/sched/features.h | 2 ++
kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3928,7 +3928,7 @@ bool cpus_share_resources(int this_cpu,
return per_cpu(sd_share_id, this_cpu) == per_cpu(sd_share_id, that_cpu);
}
-static inline bool ttwu_queue_cond(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
+static inline bool ttwu_queue_cond(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, bool def)
{
/* See SCX_OPS_ALLOW_QUEUED_WAKEUP. */
if (!scx_allow_ttwu_queue(p))
@@ -3969,18 +3969,19 @@ static inline bool ttwu_queue_cond(struc
if (!cpu_rq(cpu)->nr_running)
return true;
- return false;
+ return def;
}
static bool ttwu_queue_wakelist(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags)
{
- if (sched_feat(TTWU_QUEUE) && ttwu_queue_cond(p, cpu)) {
- sched_clock_cpu(cpu); /* Sync clocks across CPUs */
- __ttwu_queue_wakelist(p, cpu, wake_flags);
- return true;
- }
+ bool def = sched_feat(TTWU_QUEUE_DEFAULT);
- return false;
+ if (!ttwu_queue_cond(p, cpu, def))
+ return false;
+
+ sched_clock_cpu(cpu); /* Sync clocks across CPUs */
+ __ttwu_queue_wakelist(p, cpu, wake_flags);
+ return true;
}
#else /* !CONFIG_SMP */
@@ -3997,7 +3998,7 @@ static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struc
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
struct rq_flags rf;
- if (ttwu_queue_wakelist(p, cpu, wake_flags))
+ if (sched_feat(TTWU_QUEUE) && ttwu_queue_wakelist(p, cpu, wake_flags))
return;
rq_lock(rq, &rf);
@@ -4301,7 +4302,8 @@ int try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p
* scheduling.
*/
if (smp_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu) &&
- ttwu_queue_wakelist(p, task_cpu(p), wake_flags))
+ sched_feat(TTWU_QUEUE_ON_CPU) &&
+ ttwu_queue_wakelist(p, task_cpu(p), wake_flags | WF_ON_CPU))
break;
cpu = select_task_rq(p, p->wake_cpu, &wake_flags);
--- a/kernel/sched/features.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/features.h
@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ SCHED_FEAT(TTWU_QUEUE, false)
*/
SCHED_FEAT(TTWU_QUEUE, true)
#endif
+SCHED_FEAT(TTWU_QUEUE_ON_CPU, true)
+SCHED_FEAT(TTWU_QUEUE_DEFAULT, false)
/*
* When doing wakeups, attempt to limit superfluous scans of the LLC domain.
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -2312,6 +2312,8 @@ static inline int task_on_rq_migrating(s
#define WF_CURRENT_CPU 0x40 /* Prefer to move the wakee to the current CPU. */
#define WF_RQ_SELECTED 0x80 /* ->select_task_rq() was called */
+#define WF_ON_CPU 0x0100
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static_assert(WF_EXEC == SD_BALANCE_EXEC);
static_assert(WF_FORK == SD_BALANCE_FORK);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-20 9:45 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] sched: Try and address some recent-ish regressions Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-03 16:03 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-13 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] sched: Optimize ttwu() / select_task_rq() Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-09 5:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2025-06-13 9:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 10:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched: Split up ttwu_runnable() Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched: Add ttwu_queue support for delayed tasks Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-06 15:03 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-06-06 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-06 16:55 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-06-11 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 12:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-06-06 16:18 ` Phil Auld
2025-06-16 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 16:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 7:34 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-06-13 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 8:16 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-05-28 19:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] sched: Try and address some recent-ish regressions Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-29 1:41 ` Chris Mason
2025-06-14 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 0:35 ` Chris Mason
2025-05-29 10:18 ` Beata Michalska
2025-05-30 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-30 10:04 ` Chris Mason
2025-06-02 4:44 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-13 3:28 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-14 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250520101727.874587738@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®