mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	vschneid@redhat.com, clm@meta.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] sched: Optimize ttwu() / select_task_rq()
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 11:45:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250520101727.620602459@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520094538.086709102@infradead.org>

Optimize ttwu() by pushing select_idle_siblings() up above waiting for
on_cpu(). This allows making use of the cycles otherwise spend waiting
to search for an idle CPU.

One little detail is that since the task we're looking for an idle CPU
for might still be on the CPU, that CPU won't report as running the
idle task, and thus won't find his own CPU idle, even when it is.

To compensate, remove the 'rq->curr == rq->idle' condition from
idle_cpu() -- it doesn't really make sense anyway.

Additionally, Chris found (concurrently) that perf-c2c reported that
test as being a cache-miss monster.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c     |    3 ++-
 kernel/sched/syscalls.c |    3 ---
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4305,6 +4305,8 @@ int try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p
 		    ttwu_queue_wakelist(p, task_cpu(p), wake_flags))
 			break;
 
+		cpu = select_task_rq(p, p->wake_cpu, &wake_flags);
+
 		/*
 		 * If the owning (remote) CPU is still in the middle of schedule() with
 		 * this task as prev, wait until it's done referencing the task.
@@ -4316,7 +4318,6 @@ int try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p
 		 */
 		smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, !VAL);
 
-		cpu = select_task_rq(p, p->wake_cpu, &wake_flags);
 		if (task_cpu(p) != cpu) {
 			if (p->in_iowait) {
 				delayacct_blkio_end(p);
--- a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
@@ -203,9 +203,6 @@ int idle_cpu(int cpu)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 
-	if (rq->curr != rq->idle)
-		return 0;
-
 	if (rq->nr_running)
 		return 0;
 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-20 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-20  9:45 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] sched: Try and address some recent-ish regressions Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20  9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-03 16:03   ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-13  9:43     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20  9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-06-09  5:01   ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] sched: Optimize ttwu() / select_task_rq() Mike Galbraith
2025-06-13  9:40     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 10:20       ` Mike Galbraith
2025-05-20  9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched: Split up ttwu_runnable() Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20  9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] sched: Add ttwu_queue controls Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20  9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched: Add ttwu_queue support for delayed tasks Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-06 15:03   ` Vincent Guittot
2025-06-06 15:38     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-06 16:55       ` Vincent Guittot
2025-06-11  9:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 12:39           ` Vincent Guittot
2025-06-06 16:18     ` Phil Auld
2025-06-16 12:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 16:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13  7:34   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-06-13  9:51     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 10:46       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16  8:16         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-05-28 19:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] sched: Try and address some recent-ish regressions Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-29  1:41   ` Chris Mason
2025-06-14 10:04     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16  0:35       ` Chris Mason
2025-05-29 10:18   ` Beata Michalska
2025-05-30  9:00     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-30 10:04   ` Chris Mason
2025-06-02  4:44 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-13  3:28   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-14 10:15     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250520101727.620602459@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=clm@meta.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®