From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
clm@meta.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched: Add ttwu_queue support for delayed tasks
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 09:34:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <64ae41a7-2c06-4082-a4d6-0db5b635ea01@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520101727.984171377@infradead.org>
On 20/05/2025 11:45, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[...]
> @@ -3830,12 +3859,41 @@ void sched_ttwu_pending(void *arg)
> update_rq_clock(rq);
>
> llist_for_each_entry_safe(p, t, llist, wake_entry.llist) {
> + struct rq *p_rq = task_rq(p);
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * This is the ttwu_runnable() case. Notably it is possible for
> + * on-rq entities to get migrated -- even sched_delayed ones.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(p_rq != rq)) {
> + rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
> + p_rq = __task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
I always get this fairly early with TTWU_QUEUE_DELAYED enabled, related
to p->pi_lock not held in wakeup from interrupt.
[ 36.175285] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 162 at kernel/sched/core.c:679 __task_rq_lock+0xf8/0x128
[ 36.176021] Modules linked in:
[ 36.176187] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 162 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G W 6.15.0-00005-gcacccfab15bd-dirty #59 PREEMPT
[ 36.176587] Tainted: [W]=WARN
[ 36.176727] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[ 36.176964] pstate: 600000c5 (nZCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 36.177301] pc : __task_rq_lock+0xf8/0x128
[ 36.177576] lr : __task_rq_lock+0xf4/0x128
...
[ 36.181314] Call trace:
[ 36.181510] __task_rq_lock+0xf8/0x128 (P)
[ 36.181824] sched_ttwu_pending+0x2d8/0x378
[ 36.182020] __flush_smp_call_function_queue+0x138/0x37c
[ 36.182222] generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x14/0x20
[ 36.182440] ipi_handler+0x254/0x2bc
[ 36.182585] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0xa8/0x2d4
[ 36.182780] handle_irq_desc+0x34/0x58
[ 36.182942] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x1c/0x28
[ 36.183109] gic_handle_irq+0x40/0xe0
[ 36.183289] call_on_irq_stack+0x24/0x64
[ 36.183441] do_interrupt_handler+0x80/0x84
[ 36.183647] el1_interrupt+0x34/0x70
[ 36.183795] el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24
[ 36.184002] el1h_64_irq+0x6c/0x70
[...]
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -2313,6 +2313,7 @@ static inline int task_on_rq_migrating(s
> #define WF_RQ_SELECTED 0x80 /* ->select_task_rq() was called */
>
> #define WF_ON_CPU 0x0100
Looks like there is no specific handling for WF_ON_CPU yet?
> +#define WF_DELAYED 0x0200
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-13 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-20 9:45 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] sched: Try and address some recent-ish regressions Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-03 16:03 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-13 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] sched: Optimize ttwu() / select_task_rq() Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-09 5:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2025-06-13 9:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 10:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched: Split up ttwu_runnable() Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] sched: Add ttwu_queue controls Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched: Add ttwu_queue support for delayed tasks Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-06 15:03 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-06-06 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-06 16:55 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-06-11 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 12:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-06-06 16:18 ` Phil Auld
2025-06-16 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 16:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 7:34 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2025-06-13 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 8:16 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-05-28 19:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] sched: Try and address some recent-ish regressions Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-29 1:41 ` Chris Mason
2025-06-14 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 0:35 ` Chris Mason
2025-05-29 10:18 ` Beata Michalska
2025-05-30 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-30 10:04 ` Chris Mason
2025-06-02 4:44 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-13 3:28 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-14 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=64ae41a7-2c06-4082-a4d6-0db5b635ea01@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®