mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
Cc: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
	mingo@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, acme@kernel.org,
	namhyung@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Wang <00107082@163.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf/core: fix dangling cgroup pointer in cpuctx
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 16:44:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250603144414.GC38114@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250603140040.GB8020@e132581.arm.com>

On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 03:00:40PM +0100, Leo Yan wrote:

> > +	if (event->state > PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF)
> > +		perf_cgroup_event_disable(event, ctx);
> > +
> 
> As we discussed, seems to me, the issue is caused by an ambigous state
> machine transition:
> 
> When a PMU event state is PERF_EVENT_STATE_EXIT, the current code does
> not transite the state to PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF. As a result, the
> list_del_event() function skips to clean up cgroup pointer for non OFF
> states. This is different from the code prior to the commit a3c3c6667,
> which transits states EXIT -> INACTIVE -> OFF.

Right.

> My suggestion is not reliable. Roughly read code, except for the
> PERF_EVENT_STATE_EXIT case, I think other error cases should also clean
> up the cgroup pointer.  The reason is I don't see other places to
> clean up the cgroup pointer for these error cases:
> 
>   PERF_EVENT_STATE_REVOKED
>   PERF_EVENT_STATE_DEAD

Those should be done here; on the first transition into these states.

> Only in the PERF_EVENT_STATE_ERROR state, we don't need to cleanup
> cgroup as this has already been handled in merge_sched_in().
> 
> So a correct condition would be:
> 
>     if (event->state > PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF ||
>         event->state <= PERF_EVENT_STATE_EXIT)
>         perf_cgroup_event_disable(event, ctx);

I'm too tired to get my head straight. I'll look tomorrow.

> And we need to remove the perf_cgroup_event_disable() from
> list_del_event() to avoid duplicate code.
> 
> Perhaps a better approach for code consolidation would be to modify
> the conditions in list_del_event() to ensure the cgroup pointer is
> cleaned up in error cases. However, I'm not confident that this is the
> correct direction, so I would wait for suggestions from the maintainers.

Probably easier to keep here in __perf_remove_from_context() where we
have prev and next state available.

Anyway, I currently have the below, but I'll update once I've had sleep.

---
Subject: perf: Fix dangling cgroup pointer in cpuctx
From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 19:40:49 +0100

From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>

Commit a3c3c6667("perf/core: Fix child_total_time_enabled accounting
bug at task exit") moves the event->state update to before
list_del_event(). This makes the event->state test in list_del_event()
always false; never calling perf_cgroup_event_disable().

As a result, cpuctx->cgrp won't be cleared properly; causing havoc.

Fixes: a3c3c6667("perf/core: Fix child_total_time_enabled accounting bug at task exit")
Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aD2TspKH%2F7yvfYoO@e129823.arm.com/ [0]
---
 kernel/events/core.c |   21 ++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -2120,18 +2120,6 @@ list_del_event(struct perf_event *event,
 	if (event->group_leader == event)
 		del_event_from_groups(event, ctx);
 
-	/*
-	 * If event was in error state, then keep it
-	 * that way, otherwise bogus counts will be
-	 * returned on read(). The only way to get out
-	 * of error state is by explicit re-enabling
-	 * of the event
-	 */
-	if (event->state > PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF) {
-		perf_cgroup_event_disable(event, ctx);
-		perf_event_set_state(event, PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF);
-	}
-
 	ctx->generation++;
 	event->pmu_ctx->nr_events--;
 }
@@ -2493,11 +2481,14 @@ __perf_remove_from_context(struct perf_e
 		state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_EXIT;
 	if (flags & DETACH_REVOKE)
 		state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_REVOKED;
-	if (flags & DETACH_DEAD) {
-		event->pending_disable = 1;
+	if (flags & DETACH_DEAD)
 		state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_DEAD;
-	}
+
 	event_sched_out(event, ctx);
+
+	if (event->state > PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF)
+		perf_cgroup_event_disable(event, ctx);
+
 	perf_event_set_state(event, min(event->state, state));
 
 	if (flags & DETACH_GROUP)

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-03 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-02 18:40 Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03  2:01 ` David Wang
2025-06-03  4:46   ` [PATCH " Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03  5:44     ` David Wang
2025-06-03  6:34       ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03  6:39         ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03  6:47           ` David Wang
2025-06-03  6:42         ` David Wang
2025-06-03  7:16           ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03  7:31             ` David Wang
2025-06-03  8:15             ` David Wang
2025-06-03  6:54         ` David Wang
2025-06-03  9:20         ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03 10:08           ` David Wang
2025-06-03 13:41             ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03 14:02               ` David Wang
2025-06-03 14:00 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-03 14:44   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-06-03 15:17     ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-04  7:06       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04  8:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04 10:06       ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-04 12:37         ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04 12:54           ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-04 10:18       ` Leo Yan
2025-06-04 13:58         ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04 15:17           ` Leo Yan
2025-06-11  9:29           ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf: Add comment to enum perf_event_state tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04 14:16         ` [PATCH 1/1] perf/core: fix dangling cgroup pointer in cpuctx Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04 15:46           ` Leo Yan
2025-06-04 15:59             ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-05 11:29             ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-05 12:33               ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-05 17:21                 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-11  9:29                 ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf: Fix cgroup state vs ERROR tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-05 11:41           ` [PATCH 1/1] perf/core: fix dangling cgroup pointer in cpuctx Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-03 15:05   ` Yeoreum Yun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250603144414.GC38114@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=00107082@163.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®