mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
	mingo@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, acme@kernel.org,
	namhyung@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Wang <00107082@163.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf/core: fix dangling cgroup pointer in cpuctx
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 16:46:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250604154639.GE8020@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250604141640.GL38114@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 04:16:40PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

[...]

> It might be prudent to do something like so:

Thanks for the patch.

> +static void __event_disable(struct perf_event *event,
> +			    struct perf_event_context *ctx,
> +			    enum perf_event_state state)
> +{
> +	if (event == event->group_leader)
> +		group_sched_out(event, ctx);

I am a bit struggle for this code line. It disables all events in a
group, but only clear cgroup pointer for group leader but miss to clear
for sibling events.

If the cgroup pointer is only used for group leader, maybe we only
maintain (set and clear) the cgroup pointer for the leader?

Thanks,
Leo

> +	else
> +		event_sched_out(event, ctx);
> +
> +	perf_event_set_state(event, state);
> +	perf_cgroup_event_disable(event, ctx);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Cross CPU call to disable a performance event
>   */
> @@ -2575,15 +2583,7 @@ static void __perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event,
>  
>  	perf_pmu_disable(event->pmu_ctx->pmu);
>  	ctx_time_update_event(ctx, event);
> -
> -	if (event == event->group_leader)
> -		group_sched_out(event, ctx);
> -	else
> -		event_sched_out(event, ctx);
> -
> -	perf_event_set_state(event, PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF);
> -	perf_cgroup_event_disable(event, ctx);
> -
> +	__event_disable(event, ctx, PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF);
>  	perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu_ctx->pmu);
>  }
>  

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-04 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-02 18:40 Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03  2:01 ` David Wang
2025-06-03  4:46   ` [PATCH " Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03  5:44     ` David Wang
2025-06-03  6:34       ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03  6:39         ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03  6:47           ` David Wang
2025-06-03  6:42         ` David Wang
2025-06-03  7:16           ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03  7:31             ` David Wang
2025-06-03  8:15             ` David Wang
2025-06-03  6:54         ` David Wang
2025-06-03  9:20         ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03 10:08           ` David Wang
2025-06-03 13:41             ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03 14:02               ` David Wang
2025-06-03 14:00 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-03 14:44   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-03 15:17     ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-04  7:06       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04  8:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04 10:06       ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-04 12:37         ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04 12:54           ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-04 10:18       ` Leo Yan
2025-06-04 13:58         ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04 15:17           ` Leo Yan
2025-06-11  9:29           ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf: Add comment to enum perf_event_state tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04 14:16         ` [PATCH 1/1] perf/core: fix dangling cgroup pointer in cpuctx Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04 15:46           ` Leo Yan [this message]
2025-06-04 15:59             ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-05 11:29             ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-05 12:33               ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-05 17:21                 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-11  9:29                 ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf: Fix cgroup state vs ERROR tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-05 11:41           ` [PATCH 1/1] perf/core: fix dangling cgroup pointer in cpuctx Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-03 15:05   ` Yeoreum Yun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250604154639.GE8020@e132581.arm.com \
    --to=leo.yan@arm.com \
    --cc=00107082@163.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®