mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __flush_tlb_range_op macro in C
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 17:17:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250711161732.384-11-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250711161732.384-1-will@kernel.org>

The __flush_tlb_range_op() macro is horrible and has been a previous
source of bugs thanks to multiple expansions of its arguments (see
commit f7edb07ad7c6 ("Fix mmu notifiers for range-based invalidates")).

Rewrite the thing in C.

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 63 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index 2541863721af..ee69efdc12ab 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -376,12 +376,12 @@ static inline void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
 /*
  * __flush_tlb_range_op - Perform TLBI operation upon a range
  *
- * @op:	TLBI instruction that operates on a range (has 'r' prefix)
+ * @op:		TLBI instruction that operates on a range
  * @start:	The start address of the range
  * @pages:	Range as the number of pages from 'start'
  * @stride:	Flush granularity
  * @asid:	The ASID of the task (0 for IPA instructions)
- * @tlb_level:	Translation Table level hint, if known
+ * @level:	Translation Table level hint, if known
  * @lpa2:	If 'true', the lpa2 scheme is used as set out below
  *
  * When the CPU does not support TLB range operations, flush the TLB
@@ -439,33 +439,38 @@ static __always_inline void __tlbi_range(const enum tlbi_op op, u64 addr,
 #undef ___GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE
 #undef __GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE
 
-#define __flush_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride,			\
-				asid, tlb_level, lpa2)			\
-do {									\
-	typeof(start) __flush_start = start;				\
-	typeof(pages) __flush_pages = pages;				\
-	int num = 0;							\
-	int scale = 3;							\
-									\
-	while (__flush_pages > 0) {					\
-		if (!system_supports_tlb_range() ||			\
-		    __flush_pages == 1 ||				\
-		    (lpa2 && __flush_start != ALIGN(__flush_start, SZ_64K))) {	\
-			__tlbi_level_asid(op, __flush_start, tlb_level, asid);	\
-			__flush_start += stride;			\
-			__flush_pages -= stride >> PAGE_SHIFT;		\
-			continue;					\
-		}							\
-									\
-		num = __TLBI_RANGE_NUM(__flush_pages, scale);		\
-		if (num >= 0) {						\
-			__tlbi_range(op, __flush_start, asid, scale, num, tlb_level, lpa2); \
-			__flush_start += __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale) << PAGE_SHIFT; \
-			__flush_pages -= __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale);\
-		}							\
-		scale--;						\
-	}								\
-} while (0)
+static __always_inline void __flush_tlb_range_op(const enum tlbi_op op,
+						 u64 start, size_t pages,
+						 u64 stride, u16 asid,
+						 u32 level, bool lpa2)
+{
+	u64 addr = start, end = start + pages * PAGE_SIZE;
+	int scale = 3;
+
+	while (addr != end) {
+		int num;
+
+		pages = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+		if (!system_supports_tlb_range() || pages == 1)
+			goto invalidate_one;
+
+		if (lpa2 && !IS_ALIGNED(addr, SZ_64K))
+			goto invalidate_one;
+
+		num = __TLBI_RANGE_NUM(pages, scale);
+		if (num >= 0) {
+			__tlbi_range(op, addr, asid, scale, num, level, lpa2);
+			addr += __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale) << PAGE_SHIFT;
+		}
+
+		scale--;
+		continue;
+invalidate_one:
+		__tlbi_level_asid(op, addr, level, asid);
+		addr += stride;
+	}
+}
 
 #define __flush_s2_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, tlb_level) \
 	__flush_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, 0, tlb_level, kvm_lpa2_is_enabled());
-- 
2.50.0.727.gbf7dc18ff4-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-11 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-11 16:17 [PATCH 00/10] arm64: Replace TLB invalidation preprocessor macros with C functions Will Deacon
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 01/10] arm64: mm: Introduce a C wrapper for by-level TLB invalidation helpers Will Deacon
2025-07-14  8:38   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 02/10] arm64: mm: Introduce a C wrapper for by-range " Will Deacon
2025-07-14  8:26   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 03/10] arm64: mm: Implicitly invalidate user ASID based on TLBI operation Will Deacon
2025-07-14  8:44   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-14  9:46     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 04/10] arm64: mm: Remove unused 'tlbi_user' argument from __flush_tlb_range_op() Will Deacon
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 05/10] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __tlbi_level macro in C Will Deacon
2025-07-14  9:02   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 06/10] arm64: mm: Simplify __TLBI_RANGE_NUM() macro Will Deacon
2025-07-14  9:06   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-15  5:13   ` Dev Jain
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 07/10] arm64: mm: Push __TLBI_VADDR() into __tlbi_level() Will Deacon
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 08/10] arm64: mm: Inline __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE() into __tlbi_range() Will Deacon
2025-07-14  9:17   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 09/10] arm64: mm: Simplify __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess() Will Deacon
2025-07-14  9:30   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-15  5:38     ` Dev Jain
2025-07-11 16:17 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-07-11 18:16   ` [PATCH 10/10] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __flush_tlb_range_op macro in C Linus Torvalds
2025-07-13 13:35     ` Will Deacon
2025-07-14  9:44   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-10 12:29 ` [PATCH 00/10] arm64: Replace TLB invalidation preprocessor macros with C functions Ryan Roberts
2025-12-12 12:12   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-12 20:13     ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250711161732.384-11-will@kernel.org \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®