From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] arm64: mm: Inline __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE() into __tlbi_range()
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:17:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3c6b8a5-083e-4993-8a87-9fe96af0763d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250711161732.384-9-will@kernel.org>
On 11/07/2025 17:17, Will Deacon wrote:
> The __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE() macro is only used in one place and isn't
> something that's generally useful outside of the low-level range
> invalidation gubbins.
>
> Inline __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE() into the __tlbi_range() function so that the
> macro can be removed entirely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 32 +++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index 434b9fdb340a..8618a85d5cd3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -185,19 +185,6 @@ static inline void __tlbi_level(const enum tlbi_op op, u64 addr, u32 level)
> #define TLBIR_TTL_MASK GENMASK_ULL(38, 37)
> #define TLBIR_BADDR_MASK GENMASK_ULL(36, 0)
>
> -#define __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE(baddr, asid, scale, num, ttl) \
> - ({ \
> - unsigned long __ta = 0; \
> - unsigned long __ttl = (ttl >= 1 && ttl <= 3) ? ttl : 0; \
> - __ta |= FIELD_PREP(TLBIR_BADDR_MASK, baddr); \
> - __ta |= FIELD_PREP(TLBIR_TTL_MASK, __ttl); \
> - __ta |= FIELD_PREP(TLBIR_NUM_MASK, num); \
> - __ta |= FIELD_PREP(TLBIR_SCALE_MASK, scale); \
> - __ta |= FIELD_PREP(TLBIR_TG_MASK, get_trans_granule()); \
> - __ta |= FIELD_PREP(TLBIR_ASID_MASK, asid); \
> - __ta; \
> - })
> -
> /* These macros are used by the TLBI RANGE feature. */
> #define __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale) \
> ((unsigned long)((num) + 1) << (5 * (scale) + 1))
> @@ -426,8 +413,19 @@ static inline void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
> __tlbi_user(r ## op, arg); \
> break
>
> -static __always_inline void __tlbi_range(const enum tlbi_op op, u64 arg)
> +static __always_inline void __tlbi_range(const enum tlbi_op op, u64 addr,
> + u16 asid, int scale, int num,
> + u32 level, bool lpa2)
Same comment about signedness of level; I think it would be marginally less
confusing to consistently consider level as signed, and it will help us when we
get to D128 pgtables.
> {
> + u64 arg = 0;
> +
> + arg |= FIELD_PREP(TLBIR_BADDR_MASK, addr >> (lpa2 ? 16 : PAGE_SHIFT));
> + arg |= FIELD_PREP(TLBIR_TTL_MASK, level > 3 ? 0 : level);
> + arg |= FIELD_PREP(TLBIR_NUM_MASK, num);
> + arg |= FIELD_PREP(TLBIR_SCALE_MASK, scale);
> + arg |= FIELD_PREP(TLBIR_TG_MASK, get_trans_granule());
> + arg |= FIELD_PREP(TLBIR_ASID_MASK, asid);
> +
> switch (op) {
> __GEN_TLBI_OP_ASID_CASE(vae1is);
> __GEN_TLBI_OP_ASID_CASE(vale1is);
> @@ -448,8 +446,6 @@ do { \
> typeof(pages) __flush_pages = pages; \
> int num = 0; \
> int scale = 3; \
> - int shift = lpa2 ? 16 : PAGE_SHIFT; \
> - unsigned long addr; \
> \
> while (__flush_pages > 0) { \
> if (!system_supports_tlb_range() || \
> @@ -463,9 +459,7 @@ do { \
> \
> num = __TLBI_RANGE_NUM(__flush_pages, scale); \
> if (num >= 0) { \
> - addr = __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE(__flush_start >> shift, asid, \
> - scale, num, tlb_level); \
> - __tlbi_range(op, addr); \
> + __tlbi_range(op, __flush_start, asid, scale, num, tlb_level, lpa2); \
> __flush_start += __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale) << PAGE_SHIFT; \
> __flush_pages -= __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale);\
> } \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-14 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-11 16:17 [PATCH 00/10] arm64: Replace TLB invalidation preprocessor macros with C functions Will Deacon
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 01/10] arm64: mm: Introduce a C wrapper for by-level TLB invalidation helpers Will Deacon
2025-07-14 8:38 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 02/10] arm64: mm: Introduce a C wrapper for by-range " Will Deacon
2025-07-14 8:26 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 03/10] arm64: mm: Implicitly invalidate user ASID based on TLBI operation Will Deacon
2025-07-14 8:44 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-14 9:46 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 04/10] arm64: mm: Remove unused 'tlbi_user' argument from __flush_tlb_range_op() Will Deacon
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 05/10] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __tlbi_level macro in C Will Deacon
2025-07-14 9:02 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 06/10] arm64: mm: Simplify __TLBI_RANGE_NUM() macro Will Deacon
2025-07-14 9:06 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-15 5:13 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 07/10] arm64: mm: Push __TLBI_VADDR() into __tlbi_level() Will Deacon
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 08/10] arm64: mm: Inline __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE() into __tlbi_range() Will Deacon
2025-07-14 9:17 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 09/10] arm64: mm: Simplify __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess() Will Deacon
2025-07-14 9:30 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-15 5:38 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 10/10] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __flush_tlb_range_op macro in C Will Deacon
2025-07-11 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-07-13 13:35 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-14 9:44 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-10 12:29 ` [PATCH 00/10] arm64: Replace TLB invalidation preprocessor macros with C functions Ryan Roberts
2025-12-12 12:12 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-12 20:13 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e3c6b8a5-083e-4993-8a87-9fe96af0763d@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®