From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] arm64: mm: Implicitly invalidate user ASID based on TLBI operation
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 09:44:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9dccf004-1ac4-45ae-9098-69fcad7107a8@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250711161732.384-4-will@kernel.org>
On 11/07/2025 17:17, Will Deacon wrote:
> When kpti is enabled, separate ASIDs are used for userspace and
> kernelspace, requiring ASID-qualified TLB invalidation by virtual
> address to invalidate both of them.
>
> Push the logic for invalidating the two ASIDs down into the low-level
> __tlbi_level_op() function based on the TLBI operation and remove the
> burden from the caller to handle the kpti-specific behaviour.
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 45 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index 4408aeebf4d5..08e509f37b28 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -115,17 +115,25 @@ enum tlbi_op {
>
> #define TLBI_TTL_UNKNOWN INT_MAX
>
> -#define __GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(op) \
> +#define ___GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(op) \
> case op: \
> - __tlbi(op, arg); \
> + __tlbi(op, arg)
> +
> +#define __GEN_TLBI_OP_ASID_CASE(op) \
> + ___GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(op); \
> + __tlbi_user(op, arg); \
> + break
> +
> +#define __GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(op) \
> + ___GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(op); \
> break
>
> static __always_inline void __tlbi_level_op(const enum tlbi_op op, u64 arg)
> {
> switch (op) {
> - __GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(vae1is);
> + __GEN_TLBI_OP_ASID_CASE(vae1is);
> __GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(vae2is);
> - __GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(vale1is);
> + __GEN_TLBI_OP_ASID_CASE(vale1is);
> __GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(vale2is);
> __GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(vaale1is);
> __GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(ipas2e1);
> @@ -134,7 +142,8 @@ static __always_inline void __tlbi_level_op(const enum tlbi_op op, u64 arg)
> BUILD_BUG();
> }
> }
> -#undef __GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE
> +#undef __GEN_TLBI_OP_ASID_CASE
> +#undef ___GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE
>
> #define __tlbi_level(op, addr, level) do { \
> u64 arg = addr; \
> @@ -150,11 +159,6 @@ static __always_inline void __tlbi_level_op(const enum tlbi_op op, u64 arg)
> __tlbi_level_op(op, arg); \
> } while(0)
>
> -#define __tlbi_user_level(op, arg, level) do { \
> - if (arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0()) \
> - __tlbi_level(op, (arg | USER_ASID_FLAG), level); \
> -} while (0)
> -
> /*
> * This macro creates a properly formatted VA operand for the TLB RANGE. The
> * value bit assignments are:
> @@ -418,22 +422,28 @@ static inline void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
> * operations can only span an even number of pages. We save this for last to
> * ensure 64KB start alignment is maintained for the LPA2 case.
> */
> -#define __GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(op) \
> +#define ___GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(op) \
> case op: \
> - __tlbi(r ## op, arg); \
> + __tlbi(r ## op, arg)
> +
> +#define __GEN_TLBI_OP_ASID_CASE(op) \
> + ___GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(op); \
> + __tlbi_user(r ## op, arg); \
> break
>
> static __always_inline void __tlbi_range(const enum tlbi_op op, u64 arg)
> {
> switch (op) {
> - __GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(vae1is);
> - __GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(vale1is);
> + __GEN_TLBI_OP_ASID_CASE(vae1is);
> + __GEN_TLBI_OP_ASID_CASE(vale1is);
> __GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(vaale1is);
> __GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE(ipas2e1is);
Bug? This 2 underscore version is still defined from the level case above. So
this is no longer issuing a range-based tlbi? (i.e. you're no longer prepending
the "r" here.
> default:
> BUILD_BUG();
> }
> }
> +#undef __GEN_TLBI_OP_ASID_CASE
> +#undef ___GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE
> #undef __GEN_TLBI_OP_CASE
>
> #define __flush_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, \
> @@ -452,8 +462,6 @@ do { \
> (lpa2 && __flush_start != ALIGN(__flush_start, SZ_64K))) { \
> addr = __TLBI_VADDR(__flush_start, asid); \
> __tlbi_level(op, addr, tlb_level); \
> - if (tlbi_user) \
> - __tlbi_user_level(op, addr, tlb_level); \
> __flush_start += stride; \
> __flush_pages -= stride >> PAGE_SHIFT; \
> continue; \
> @@ -464,8 +472,6 @@ do { \
> addr = __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE(__flush_start >> shift, asid, \
> scale, num, tlb_level); \
> __tlbi_range(op, addr); \
> - if (tlbi_user) \
> - __tlbi_user(r##op, addr); \
> __flush_start += __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale) << PAGE_SHIFT; \
> __flush_pages -= __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale);\
> } \
> @@ -584,6 +590,7 @@ static inline void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *b
> {
> __flush_tlb_range_nosync(mm, start, end, PAGE_SIZE, true, 3);
> }
> -#endif
>
> +#undef __tlbi_user
> +#endif
> #endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-14 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-11 16:17 [PATCH 00/10] arm64: Replace TLB invalidation preprocessor macros with C functions Will Deacon
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 01/10] arm64: mm: Introduce a C wrapper for by-level TLB invalidation helpers Will Deacon
2025-07-14 8:38 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 02/10] arm64: mm: Introduce a C wrapper for by-range " Will Deacon
2025-07-14 8:26 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 03/10] arm64: mm: Implicitly invalidate user ASID based on TLBI operation Will Deacon
2025-07-14 8:44 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2025-07-14 9:46 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 04/10] arm64: mm: Remove unused 'tlbi_user' argument from __flush_tlb_range_op() Will Deacon
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 05/10] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __tlbi_level macro in C Will Deacon
2025-07-14 9:02 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 06/10] arm64: mm: Simplify __TLBI_RANGE_NUM() macro Will Deacon
2025-07-14 9:06 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-15 5:13 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 07/10] arm64: mm: Push __TLBI_VADDR() into __tlbi_level() Will Deacon
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 08/10] arm64: mm: Inline __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE() into __tlbi_range() Will Deacon
2025-07-14 9:17 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 09/10] arm64: mm: Simplify __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess() Will Deacon
2025-07-14 9:30 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-15 5:38 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 10/10] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __flush_tlb_range_op macro in C Will Deacon
2025-07-11 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-07-13 13:35 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-14 9:44 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-10 12:29 ` [PATCH 00/10] arm64: Replace TLB invalidation preprocessor macros with C functions Ryan Roberts
2025-12-12 12:12 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-12 20:13 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9dccf004-1ac4-45ae-9098-69fcad7107a8@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®