From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] arm64: Replace TLB invalidation preprocessor macros with C functions
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 12:29:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb583fda-cbd1-4ef2-900a-a86e08a0b5d3@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250711161732.384-1-will@kernel.org>
On 11/07/2025 17:17, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I cooked this series following a complaint from Linus back in March
> about our range-based TLB invalidation macro after we fixed an
> over-invalidation bug thanks to incorrect handling of its arguments:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgiX0q0WCL+SFwVCYtG7JR3=2Rshse-5J3AO2Y4AgT7Jw@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Once I started trying to rework the range macro into a C function, I
> spotted a few other opportunities for cleanup and so I've ended up with
> this series.
>
> Testing and feedback welcome.
Hi Will,
Did this go anywhere/are you planning to post a new version? There are a couple
of other cleanups I'd like to do in this area, and also I'd like to add tlbip
support. But I don't want to spend time on it if the baseline is going to
drastically change.
If you're not planning a v2, perhaps I could have a go then extend for the
extras I want to do?
Thanks,
Ryan
>
> Cheers,
>
> Will
>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>
> --->8
>
> Will Deacon (10):
> arm64: mm: Introduce a C wrapper for by-level TLB invalidation helpers
> arm64: mm: Introduce a C wrapper for by-range TLB invalidation helpers
> arm64: mm: Implicitly invalidate user ASID based on TLBI operation
> arm64: mm: Remove unused 'tlbi_user' argument from
> __flush_tlb_range_op()
> arm64: mm: Re-implement the __tlbi_level macro in C
> arm64: mm: Simplify __TLBI_RANGE_NUM() macro
> arm64: mm: Push __TLBI_VADDR() into __tlbi_level()
> arm64: mm: Inline __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE() into __tlbi_range()
> arm64: mm: Simplify __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess()
> arm64: mm: Re-implement the __flush_tlb_range_op macro in C
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 230 ++++++++++++++++++------------
> arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mm.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 4 +-
> 4 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-10 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-11 16:17 Will Deacon
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 01/10] arm64: mm: Introduce a C wrapper for by-level TLB invalidation helpers Will Deacon
2025-07-14 8:38 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 02/10] arm64: mm: Introduce a C wrapper for by-range " Will Deacon
2025-07-14 8:26 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 03/10] arm64: mm: Implicitly invalidate user ASID based on TLBI operation Will Deacon
2025-07-14 8:44 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-14 9:46 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 04/10] arm64: mm: Remove unused 'tlbi_user' argument from __flush_tlb_range_op() Will Deacon
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 05/10] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __tlbi_level macro in C Will Deacon
2025-07-14 9:02 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 06/10] arm64: mm: Simplify __TLBI_RANGE_NUM() macro Will Deacon
2025-07-14 9:06 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-15 5:13 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 07/10] arm64: mm: Push __TLBI_VADDR() into __tlbi_level() Will Deacon
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 08/10] arm64: mm: Inline __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE() into __tlbi_range() Will Deacon
2025-07-14 9:17 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 09/10] arm64: mm: Simplify __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess() Will Deacon
2025-07-14 9:30 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-15 5:38 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 10/10] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __flush_tlb_range_op macro in C Will Deacon
2025-07-11 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-07-13 13:35 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-14 9:44 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-10 12:29 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2025-12-12 12:12 ` [PATCH 00/10] arm64: Replace TLB invalidation preprocessor macros with C functions Ryan Roberts
2025-12-12 20:13 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eb583fda-cbd1-4ef2-900a-a86e08a0b5d3@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®