From: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@linux.dev>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] RISC-V: KVM: Move copy_sbi_ext_reg_indices() to SBI implementation
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 21:25:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250814155548.457172-5-apatel@ventanamicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250814155548.457172-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
The ONE_REG handling of SBI extension enable/disable registers and
SBI extension state registers is already under SBI implementation.
On similar lines, let's move copy_sbi_ext_reg_indices() under SBI
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h | 2 +-
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c | 29 ++-------------------------
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h
index 144c3f6d5eb9..212c31629bc8 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ void kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_request_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
unsigned long pc, unsigned long a1);
void kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_load_reset_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
+int kvm_riscv_vcpu_reg_indices_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices);
int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg);
int kvm_riscv_vcpu_get_reg_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -87,7 +88,6 @@ int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_sbi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *
int kvm_riscv_vcpu_get_reg_sbi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg);
const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension *kvm_vcpu_sbi_find_ext(
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long extid);
-bool riscv_vcpu_supports_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int idx);
int kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_ecall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
void kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c
index 5843b0519224..0894ab517525 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c
@@ -1060,34 +1060,9 @@ static inline unsigned long num_isa_ext_regs(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return copy_isa_ext_reg_indices(vcpu, NULL);
}
-static int copy_sbi_ext_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
-{
- unsigned int n = 0;
-
- for (int i = 0; i < KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_MAX; i++) {
- u64 size = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT) ?
- KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 : KVM_REG_SIZE_U64;
- u64 reg = KVM_REG_RISCV | size | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT |
- KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | i;
-
- if (!riscv_vcpu_supports_sbi_ext(vcpu, i))
- continue;
-
- if (uindices) {
- if (put_user(reg, uindices))
- return -EFAULT;
- uindices++;
- }
-
- n++;
- }
-
- return n;
-}
-
static unsigned long num_sbi_ext_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- return copy_sbi_ext_reg_indices(vcpu, NULL);
+ return kvm_riscv_vcpu_reg_indices_sbi_ext(vcpu, NULL);
}
static inline unsigned long num_sbi_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -1215,7 +1190,7 @@ int kvm_riscv_vcpu_copy_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return ret;
uindices += ret;
- ret = copy_sbi_ext_reg_indices(vcpu, uindices);
+ ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_reg_indices_sbi_ext(vcpu, uindices);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
uindices += ret;
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c
index 8b3c393e0c83..19e0e3d7b598 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ riscv_vcpu_get_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long idx)
return sext;
}
-bool riscv_vcpu_supports_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int idx)
+static bool riscv_vcpu_supports_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int idx)
{
struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_context *scontext = &vcpu->arch.sbi_context;
const struct kvm_riscv_sbi_extension_entry *sext;
@@ -288,6 +288,31 @@ static int riscv_vcpu_get_sbi_ext_multi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return 0;
}
+int kvm_riscv_vcpu_reg_indices_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
+{
+ unsigned int n = 0;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_MAX; i++) {
+ u64 size = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT) ?
+ KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 : KVM_REG_SIZE_U64;
+ u64 reg = KVM_REG_RISCV | size | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT |
+ KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | i;
+
+ if (!riscv_vcpu_supports_sbi_ext(vcpu, i))
+ continue;
+
+ if (uindices) {
+ if (put_user(reg, uindices))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ uindices++;
+ }
+
+ n++;
+ }
+
+ return n;
+}
+
int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
{
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-14 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-14 15:55 [PATCH 0/6] ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT extension Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] RISC-V: KVM: Set initial value of hedeleg in kvm_arch_vcpu_create() Anup Patel
2025-08-15 20:04 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-19 9:01 ` Nutty.Liu
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] RISC-V: KVM: Introduce feature specific reset for SBI FWFT Anup Patel
2025-08-15 20:14 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-19 9:02 ` Nutty.Liu
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 3/6] RISC-V: KVM: Introduce optional ONE_REG callbacks for SBI extensions Anup Patel
2025-08-15 21:00 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-17 12:04 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` Anup Patel [this message]
2025-08-15 21:04 ` [PATCH 4/6] RISC-V: KVM: Move copy_sbi_ext_reg_indices() to SBI implementation Andrew Jones
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 5/6] RISC-V: KVM: Implement ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT state Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI FWFT to get-reg-list test Anup Patel
2025-08-18 10:29 ` [PATCH 0/6] ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT extension Radim Krčmář
2025-08-19 6:30 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-19 11:43 ` Radim Krčmář
2025-08-19 15:52 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-19 17:35 ` Radim Krčmář
2025-08-21 6:26 ` Anup Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250814155548.457172-5-apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--to=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atish.patra@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®