mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@ventanamicro.com>
To: "Anup Patel" <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
	"Atish Patra" <atish.patra@linux.dev>
Cc: "Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"Alexandre Ghiti" <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	"Andrew Jones" <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
	"Anup Patel" <anup@brainfault.org>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-riscv" <linux-riscv-bounces@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT extension
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 12:29:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DC5HEJRMZ84K.34OPU922A7XBE@ventanamicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250814155548.457172-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com>

2025-08-14T21:25:42+05:30, Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>:
> This series adds ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT extension implemented
> by KVM RISC-V.

I think it would be better to ONE_REG the CSRs (medeleg/menvcfg), or at
least expose their CSR fields (each sensible medeleg bit, PMM, ...)
through kvm_riscv_config, than to couple this with SBI/FWFT.

The controlled behavior is defined by the ISA, and userspace might want
to configure the S-mode execution environment even when SBI/FWFT is not
present, which is not possible with the current design.

Is there a benefit in expressing the ISA model through SBI/FWFT?

Thanks.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-18 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-14 15:55 Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] RISC-V: KVM: Set initial value of hedeleg in kvm_arch_vcpu_create() Anup Patel
2025-08-15 20:04   ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-19  9:01   ` Nutty.Liu
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] RISC-V: KVM: Introduce feature specific reset for SBI FWFT Anup Patel
2025-08-15 20:14   ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-19  9:02   ` Nutty.Liu
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 3/6] RISC-V: KVM: Introduce optional ONE_REG callbacks for SBI extensions Anup Patel
2025-08-15 21:00   ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-17 12:04     ` Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 4/6] RISC-V: KVM: Move copy_sbi_ext_reg_indices() to SBI implementation Anup Patel
2025-08-15 21:04   ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 5/6] RISC-V: KVM: Implement ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT state Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI FWFT to get-reg-list test Anup Patel
2025-08-18 10:29 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2025-08-19  6:30   ` [PATCH 0/6] ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT extension Anup Patel
2025-08-19 11:43     ` Radim Krčmář
2025-08-19 15:52       ` Anup Patel
2025-08-19 17:35         ` Radim Krčmář
2025-08-21  6:26           ` Anup Patel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DC5HEJRMZ84K.34OPU922A7XBE@ventanamicro.com \
    --to=rkrcmar@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=atish.patra@linux.dev \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv-bounces@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®