From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@linux.dev>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] RISC-V: KVM: Introduce feature specific reset for SBI FWFT
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 15:14:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250815-30ccdcf30a9746a3b2443b4b@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250814155548.457172-3-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 09:25:44PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> The SBI FWFT feature values must be reset upon VCPU reset so
> introduce feature specific reset callback for this purpose.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_fwft.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_fwft.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_fwft.c
> index 164a01288b0a..5a3bad0f9330 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_fwft.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_fwft.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,13 @@ struct kvm_sbi_fwft_feature {
> */
> bool (*supported)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> + /**
> + * @reset: Reset the feature value irrespective whether feature is supported or not
> + *
> + * This callback is mandatory
> + */
> + void (*reset)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +
> /**
> * @set: Set the feature value
> *
> @@ -75,6 +82,13 @@ static bool kvm_sbi_fwft_misaligned_delegation_supported(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return misaligned_traps_can_delegate();
> }
>
> +static void kvm_sbi_fwft_reset_misaligned_delegation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vcpu_config *cfg = &vcpu->arch.cfg;
> +
> + cfg->hedeleg &= ~MIS_DELEG;
> +}
> +
> static long kvm_sbi_fwft_set_misaligned_delegation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_sbi_fwft_config *conf,
> unsigned long value)
> @@ -124,6 +138,11 @@ static bool kvm_sbi_fwft_pointer_masking_pmlen_supported(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return fwft->have_vs_pmlen_7 || fwft->have_vs_pmlen_16;
> }
>
> +static void kvm_sbi_fwft_reset_pointer_masking_pmlen(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + vcpu->arch.cfg.henvcfg &= ~ENVCFG_PMM;
> +}
> +
> static long kvm_sbi_fwft_set_pointer_masking_pmlen(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_sbi_fwft_config *conf,
> unsigned long value)
> @@ -180,6 +199,7 @@ static const struct kvm_sbi_fwft_feature features[] = {
> {
> .id = SBI_FWFT_MISALIGNED_EXC_DELEG,
> .supported = kvm_sbi_fwft_misaligned_delegation_supported,
> + .reset = kvm_sbi_fwft_reset_misaligned_delegation,
> .set = kvm_sbi_fwft_set_misaligned_delegation,
> .get = kvm_sbi_fwft_get_misaligned_delegation,
> },
> @@ -187,6 +207,7 @@ static const struct kvm_sbi_fwft_feature features[] = {
> {
> .id = SBI_FWFT_POINTER_MASKING_PMLEN,
> .supported = kvm_sbi_fwft_pointer_masking_pmlen_supported,
> + .reset = kvm_sbi_fwft_reset_pointer_masking_pmlen,
> .set = kvm_sbi_fwft_set_pointer_masking_pmlen,
> .get = kvm_sbi_fwft_get_pointer_masking_pmlen,
> },
> @@ -321,11 +342,16 @@ static void kvm_sbi_ext_fwft_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> static void kvm_sbi_ext_fwft_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - int i;
> struct kvm_sbi_fwft *fwft = vcpu_to_fwft(vcpu);
> + const struct kvm_sbi_fwft_feature *feature;
> + int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(features); i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(features); i++) {
> fwft->configs[i].flags = 0;
> + feature = &features[i];
> + if (feature->reset)
> + feature->reset(vcpu);
> + }
> }
>
> const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_fwft = {
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-15 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-14 15:55 [PATCH 0/6] ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT extension Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] RISC-V: KVM: Set initial value of hedeleg in kvm_arch_vcpu_create() Anup Patel
2025-08-15 20:04 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-19 9:01 ` Nutty.Liu
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] RISC-V: KVM: Introduce feature specific reset for SBI FWFT Anup Patel
2025-08-15 20:14 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2025-08-19 9:02 ` Nutty.Liu
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 3/6] RISC-V: KVM: Introduce optional ONE_REG callbacks for SBI extensions Anup Patel
2025-08-15 21:00 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-17 12:04 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 4/6] RISC-V: KVM: Move copy_sbi_ext_reg_indices() to SBI implementation Anup Patel
2025-08-15 21:04 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 5/6] RISC-V: KVM: Implement ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT state Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI FWFT to get-reg-list test Anup Patel
2025-08-18 10:29 ` [PATCH 0/6] ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT extension Radim Krčmář
2025-08-19 6:30 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-19 11:43 ` Radim Krčmář
2025-08-19 15:52 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-19 17:35 ` Radim Krčmář
2025-08-21 6:26 ` Anup Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250815-30ccdcf30a9746a3b2443b4b@orel \
--to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=atish.patra@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®