From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, irogers@google.com,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
zide.chen@intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
ravi.bangoria@amd.com, eranian@google.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 12/17] perf/x86: Add SSP into sample_regs
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 14:34:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250815213435.1702022-13-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250815213435.1702022-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
The SSP is only supported when the new SIMD registers configuration
method is used, which moves the XMM to sample_simd_vec_regs. So the
space can be reclaimed for the SSP.
The SSP is retrieved by XSAVE. Only support the SSP for X86_64.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 ++++
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 3 +++
arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 8 +++++++-
4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index f816290defc1..b0c8b24975cb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -434,6 +434,8 @@ static void x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs, u64 mask)
perf_regs->opmask = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_OPMASK);
if (valid_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_APX)
perf_regs->egpr = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_APX);
+ if (valid_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER)
+ perf_regs->cet = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_CET_USER);
}
static void release_ext_regs_buffers(void)
@@ -712,7 +714,7 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
if (event->attr.sample_type & (PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR | PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER)) {
if (event->attr.sample_simd_regs_enabled) {
- u64 reserved = ~GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX - 1, 0);
+ u64 reserved = ~GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_MISC_MAX - 1, 0);
if (!(event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -727,6 +729,11 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
event->attr.sample_regs_intr & PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK) &&
!(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_APX))
return -EINVAL;
+ if ((event->attr.sample_regs_user & BIT_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_SSP) ||
+ event->attr.sample_regs_intr & BIT_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_SSP)) &&
+ !(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
} else {
/*
* Besides the general purpose registers, XMM registers may
@@ -1904,6 +1911,11 @@ void x86_pmu_setup_regs_data(struct perf_event *event,
perf_regs->egpr_regs = NULL;
mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_APX;
}
+ if (attr->sample_regs_user & BIT_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_SSP) ||
+ attr->sample_regs_intr & BIT_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_SSP)) {
+ perf_regs->cet_regs = NULL;
+ mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER;
+ }
}
mask &= ~ignore_mask;
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 4400cb66bc8e..28ddff38d232 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -617,6 +617,10 @@ struct x86_perf_regs {
u64 *egpr_regs;
struct apx_state *egpr;
};
+ union {
+ u64 *cet_regs;
+ struct cet_user_state *cet;
+ };
};
extern unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index cd0f6804debf..4d88cb18acb9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
PERF_REG_X86_32_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_GS + 1,
PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_R31 + 1,
+ PERF_REG_X86_SSP,
+ PERF_REG_MISC_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_SSP + 1,
+
/*
* These all need two bits set because they are 128bit.
* These are only available when !PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
index b6e50194ff3e..d579fa3223c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -92,6 +92,11 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
return 0;
return perf_regs->egpr_regs[idx - PERF_REG_X86_R16];
}
+ if (idx == PERF_REG_X86_SSP) {
+ if (!perf_regs->cet_regs)
+ return 0;
+ return perf_regs->cet_regs[1];
+ }
} else {
if (idx >= PERF_REG_X86_XMM0 && idx < PERF_REG_X86_XMM_MAX) {
if (!perf_regs->xmm_regs)
@@ -179,7 +184,8 @@ int perf_simd_reg_validate(u16 vec_qwords, u64 vec_mask,
~((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_MAX) - 1))
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
-#define REG_NOSUPPORT GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_R31, PERF_REG_X86_R8)
+#define REG_NOSUPPORT (GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_R31, PERF_REG_X86_R8) | \
+ BIT_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_SSP))
int perf_reg_validate(u64 mask)
{
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-15 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-15 21:34 [PATCH V3 00/17] Support vector and more extended registers in perf kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 01/17] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in the x86 nmi handler kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 02/17] perf/x86: Setup the regs data kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 03/17] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 04/17] perf: Move has_extended_regs() to header file kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 05/17] perf/x86: Support XMM register for non-PEBS and REGS_USER kan.liang
2025-08-19 13:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-19 15:55 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-20 9:46 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-20 18:03 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-21 1:00 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 06/17] perf: Support SIMD registers kan.liang
2025-08-20 9:55 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-20 18:08 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 07/17] perf/x86: Move XMM to sample_simd_vec_regs kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 08/17] perf/x86: Add YMM into sample_simd_vec_regs kan.liang
2025-08-20 9:59 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-20 18:10 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 09/17] perf/x86: Add ZMM " kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 10/17] perf/x86: Add OPMASK into sample_simd_pred_reg kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 11/17] perf/x86: Add eGPRs into sample_regs kan.liang
2025-08-20 10:01 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-15 21:34 ` kan.liang [this message]
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 13/17] perf/x86/intel: Enable PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [POC PATCH 14/17] perf/x86/regs: Only support legacy regs for the PT and PERF_REGS_MASK for now kan.liang
2025-08-25 9:07 ` Adrian Hunter
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [POC PATCH 15/17] tools headers: Sync with the kernel sources kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [POC PATCH 16/17] perf parse-regs: Support the new SIMD format kan.liang
2025-08-20 10:04 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-20 18:18 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-21 3:35 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [POC PATCH 17/17] perf regs: Support the PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250815213435.1702022-13-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®