From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
zide.chen@intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
ravi.bangoria@amd.com, eranian@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 05/17] perf/x86: Support XMM register for non-PEBS and REGS_USER
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 15:39:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250819133902.GJ4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250815213435.1702022-6-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 02:34:23PM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>
> Collecting the XMM registers in a PEBS record has been supported since
> the Icelake. But non-PEBS events don't support the feature. It's
> possible to retrieve the XMM registers from the XSAVE for non-PEBS.
> Add it to make the feature complete.
>
> To utilize the XSAVE, a 64-byte aligned buffer is required. Add a
> per-CPU ext_regs_buf to store the vector registers. The size of the
> buffer is ~2K. kzalloc_node() is used because there's a _guarantee_
> that all kmalloc()'s with powers of 2 are naturally aligned and also
> 64b aligned.
>
> Extend the support for both REGS_USER and REGS_INTR. For REGS_USER, the
> perf_get_regs_user() returns the regs from the task_pt_regs(current),
> which is struct pt_regs. Need to move it to local struct x86_perf_regs
> x86_user_regs.
> For PEBS, the HW support is still preferred. The XMM should be retrieved
> from PEBS records.
>
> There could be more vector registers supported later. Add ext_regs_mask
> to track the supported vector register group.
I'm a little confused... *again* :-)
Specifically, we should consider two sets of registers:
- the live set, as per the CPU (XSAVE)
- the stored set, as per x86_task_fpu()
regs_intr should always get a copy of the live set; however
regs_user should not. It might need a copy of the x86_task_fpu() instead
of the live set, depending on TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD (more or less, we need
another variable set in kernel_fpu_begin_mask() *after*
save_fpregs_to_fpstate() is completed).
I don't see this code make this distinction.
Consider getting a sample while the kernel is doing some avx enhanced
crypto and such.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-19 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-15 21:34 [PATCH V3 00/17] Support vector and more extended registers in perf kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 01/17] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in the x86 nmi handler kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 02/17] perf/x86: Setup the regs data kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 03/17] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 04/17] perf: Move has_extended_regs() to header file kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 05/17] perf/x86: Support XMM register for non-PEBS and REGS_USER kan.liang
2025-08-19 13:39 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-08-19 15:55 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-20 9:46 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-20 18:03 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-21 1:00 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 06/17] perf: Support SIMD registers kan.liang
2025-08-20 9:55 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-20 18:08 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 07/17] perf/x86: Move XMM to sample_simd_vec_regs kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 08/17] perf/x86: Add YMM into sample_simd_vec_regs kan.liang
2025-08-20 9:59 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-20 18:10 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 09/17] perf/x86: Add ZMM " kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 10/17] perf/x86: Add OPMASK into sample_simd_pred_reg kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 11/17] perf/x86: Add eGPRs into sample_regs kan.liang
2025-08-20 10:01 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 12/17] perf/x86: Add SSP " kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 13/17] perf/x86/intel: Enable PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [POC PATCH 14/17] perf/x86/regs: Only support legacy regs for the PT and PERF_REGS_MASK for now kan.liang
2025-08-25 9:07 ` Adrian Hunter
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [POC PATCH 15/17] tools headers: Sync with the kernel sources kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [POC PATCH 16/17] perf parse-regs: Support the new SIMD format kan.liang
2025-08-20 10:04 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-20 18:18 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-21 3:35 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [POC PATCH 17/17] perf regs: Support the PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250819133902.GJ4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®