* [PATCH v2 1/2] platform/x86: barco-p50-gpio: normalize return value of gpio_get
2026-03-19 2:56 [PATCH v2 0/2] barco-p50-gpio: normalize return value of "get" and convert to guard() Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2026-03-19 2:56 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2026-03-19 9:45 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-19 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] platform/x86: barco-p50-gpio: convert to guard() notation Dmitry Torokhov
2026-03-23 10:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] barco-p50-gpio: normalize return value of "get" and convert to guard() Ilpo Järvinen
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2026-03-19 2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ilpo Järvinen, Santosh Kumar Yadav
Cc: Peter Korsgaard, Hans de Goede, Linus Walleij,
Bartosz Golaszewski, platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel,
linux-gpio
The GPIO get callback is expected to return 0 or 1 (or a negative error
code). Ensure that the value returned by p50_gpio_get() is normalized
to the [0, 1] range.
Fixes: 86ef402d805d606a ("gpiolib: sanitize the return value of gpio_chip::get()")
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/barco-p50-gpio.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/barco-p50-gpio.c b/drivers/platform/x86/barco-p50-gpio.c
index 6f13e81f98fb..360ffd8505d6 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/barco-p50-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/barco-p50-gpio.c
@@ -275,8 +275,11 @@ static int p50_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
mutex_lock(&p50->lock);
ret = p50_send_mbox_cmd(p50, P50_MBOX_CMD_READ_GPIO, gpio_params[offset], 0);
- if (ret == 0)
+ if (ret == 0) {
ret = p50_read_mbox_reg(p50, P50_MBOX_REG_DATA);
+ if (ret >= 0)
+ ret = !!ret;
+ }
mutex_unlock(&p50->lock);
--
2.53.0.851.ga537e3e6e9-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] platform/x86: barco-p50-gpio: normalize return value of gpio_get
2026-03-19 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] platform/x86: barco-p50-gpio: normalize return value of gpio_get Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2026-03-19 9:45 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2026-03-19 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Torokhov
Cc: Peter Korsgaard, Hans de Goede, Linus Walleij,
Bartosz Golaszewski, platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel,
linux-gpio, Ilpo Järvinen, Santosh Kumar Yadav
On Thu, 19 Mar 2026 03:56:17 +0100, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> said:
> The GPIO get callback is expected to return 0 or 1 (or a negative error
> code). Ensure that the value returned by p50_gpio_get() is normalized
> to the [0, 1] range.
>
> Fixes: 86ef402d805d606a ("gpiolib: sanitize the return value of gpio_chip::get()")
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] platform/x86: barco-p50-gpio: convert to guard() notation
2026-03-19 2:56 [PATCH v2 0/2] barco-p50-gpio: normalize return value of "get" and convert to guard() Dmitry Torokhov
2026-03-19 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] platform/x86: barco-p50-gpio: normalize return value of gpio_get Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2026-03-19 2:56 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2026-03-19 9:46 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-23 10:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] barco-p50-gpio: normalize return value of "get" and convert to guard() Ilpo Järvinen
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2026-03-19 2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ilpo Järvinen, Santosh Kumar Yadav
Cc: Peter Korsgaard, Hans de Goede, Linus Walleij,
Bartosz Golaszewski, platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel,
linux-gpio
Using guard notation simplifies control flow and makes the code clearer.
Suggested-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/barco-p50-gpio.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/barco-p50-gpio.c b/drivers/platform/x86/barco-p50-gpio.c
index 360ffd8505d6..2a6d8607c402 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/barco-p50-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/barco-p50-gpio.c
@@ -272,33 +272,27 @@ static int p50_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
struct p50_gpio *p50 = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&p50->lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&p50->lock);
ret = p50_send_mbox_cmd(p50, P50_MBOX_CMD_READ_GPIO, gpio_params[offset], 0);
- if (ret == 0) {
- ret = p50_read_mbox_reg(p50, P50_MBOX_REG_DATA);
- if (ret >= 0)
- ret = !!ret;
- }
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
- mutex_unlock(&p50->lock);
+ ret = p50_read_mbox_reg(p50, P50_MBOX_REG_DATA);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
- return ret;
+ return !!ret;
}
static int p50_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int value)
{
struct p50_gpio *p50 = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- int ret;
-
- mutex_lock(&p50->lock);
- ret = p50_send_mbox_cmd(p50, P50_MBOX_CMD_WRITE_GPIO,
- gpio_params[offset], value);
+ guard(mutex)(&p50->lock);
- mutex_unlock(&p50->lock);
-
- return ret;
+ return p50_send_mbox_cmd(p50, P50_MBOX_CMD_WRITE_GPIO,
+ gpio_params[offset], value);
}
static int p50_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
--
2.53.0.851.ga537e3e6e9-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] platform/x86: barco-p50-gpio: convert to guard() notation
2026-03-19 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] platform/x86: barco-p50-gpio: convert to guard() notation Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2026-03-19 9:46 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2026-03-19 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Torokhov
Cc: Peter Korsgaard, Hans de Goede, Linus Walleij,
Bartosz Golaszewski, platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel,
linux-gpio, Ilpo Järvinen, Santosh Kumar Yadav
On Thu, 19 Mar 2026 03:56:18 +0100, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> said:
> Using guard notation simplifies control flow and makes the code clearer.
>
> Suggested-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] barco-p50-gpio: normalize return value of "get" and convert to guard()
2026-03-19 2:56 [PATCH v2 0/2] barco-p50-gpio: normalize return value of "get" and convert to guard() Dmitry Torokhov
2026-03-19 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] platform/x86: barco-p50-gpio: normalize return value of gpio_get Dmitry Torokhov
2026-03-19 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] platform/x86: barco-p50-gpio: convert to guard() notation Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2026-03-23 10:47 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ilpo Järvinen @ 2026-03-23 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Santosh Kumar Yadav, Dmitry Torokhov
Cc: Peter Korsgaard, Hans de Goede, Linus Walleij,
Bartosz Golaszewski, platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel,
linux-gpio
On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 19:56:16 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> These 2 patches fixes a regression in the driver arising from gpiolib
> tightening its API, and converts it to guard() notation when taking a
> mutex to simplify the code flow.
>
> v2:
>
> - added reviiewed-by and fixes trailers
> - added new patch using guard()
>
> [...]
Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local
review-ilpo-next branch. Note it will show up in the public
platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-next branch only once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.
The list of commits applied:
[1/2] platform/x86: barco-p50-gpio: normalize return value of gpio_get
commit: 1c9d30d37aaffe3454d70b89a77f8aaecda257bf
[2/2] platform/x86: barco-p50-gpio: convert to guard() notation
commit: a5877e921389178f994a5ec15a145d7e7ba3ec65
--
i.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread