Re: [PATCH v1] clang-format: Fix formatting of guard()

["Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>]

Hi Miguel,

Could you please sent the PR to Linus and Cc stable@?

Thanks,
 Mickaël

On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 02:49:35PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 2:34 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> wrote:
> >
> > I guess parts 2 and 3 should probably be send for v7.13 (it's a big
> > patch) whereas part 1 in 7.12-rcX, so I'll let you handle that properly.
> 
> Sometimes I sent these PRs to Linus in -rcs, to catch new code, so it
> should be fine, I can do it either way.
> 
> > Yes, thanks.  I'll keep the Landlock-specific patch I sent.
> 
> Sounds good.
> 
> > Yes, but I enforce it for Landlock, which helps a lot:
> 
> Yeah, that is very good, and I am very glad to see it is useful for
> you and that you could get to enforcement.
> 
> What I meant is that it cannot really be "truly enforced" across
> trees, especially if the config keeps changing and so on; unlike
> `rustfmt`, where one is not supposed to push anything to linux-next
> that doesn't pass.
> 
> I mean, I would love if we could, but it is a very long-term thing.
> Over time, my hope is that more subsystems start enforcing it on their
> own and so on.
> 
> Cheers,
> Miguel