* [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: amd: fix building without CONFIG_ACPI
@ 2026-09-25 13:10 Arnd Bergmann
2026-09-25 13:32 ` Mario Limonciello
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2026-09-25 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liam Girdwood, Peter Ujfalusi, Bard Liao, Daniel Baluta,
Mark Brown, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai, Vijendar Mukunda
Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Kai Vehmanen, Pierre-Louis Bossart,
Mario Limonciello, sound-open-firmware, linux-sound,
linux-kernel
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
When ACPI is disabled, this driver runs into a build failure:
sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c:1374:13: error: call to undeclared function 'acpi_find_child_device'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
1374 | pdm_dev = acpi_find_child_device(adev, ACP7X_DMIC_ADDR, 0);
The code block is already guarded by an 'if (adev)' check that
can only be true if ACPI is enabled, so add another #ifdef
to match this.
Fixes: 203ea76c4b0a ("ASoC: SOF: amd: add ACP7.B/7.F PDM controller scan and pdata propagation")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
I also tried adding ACPI Kconfig dependencies, but that quickly
got out of hand since the acp module is selected by a number of
drivers that then all need the same dependency.
It may be possible to work around this in the ACPI code by adding
a stub macro for acpi_find_child_device() that does nothing.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c b/sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c
index b059039c9e0d..4b2d7cb244c9 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c
@@ -1059,6 +1059,7 @@ int amd_sof_acp_resume(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS(amd_sof_acp_resume, "SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_COMMON");
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
static void acp_sof_scan_pdm_devices(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
struct acpi_device *pdm_dev)
{
@@ -1083,6 +1084,7 @@ static void acp_sof_scan_pdm_devices(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
}
fwnode_handle_put(child);
}
+#endif
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_SOUNDWIRE)
static int acp_sof_scan_sdw_devices(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u64 addr)
@@ -1299,9 +1301,7 @@ int amd_sof_acp7x_probe(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
struct pci_dev *pci = to_pci_dev(sdev->dev);
struct acp_dev_data *adata;
const struct sof_amd_acp_desc *chip;
- const union acpi_object *obj;
struct acpi_device *adev;
- struct acpi_device *pdm_dev;
unsigned int addr;
unsigned int irqflags;
int ret;
@@ -1369,7 +1369,11 @@ int amd_sof_acp7x_probe(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
adata->is_sdw_dev = true;
skip_soundwire:
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
if (adev) {
+ struct acpi_device *pdm_dev;
+ const union acpi_object *obj;
+
/* DMIC ACPI child address is 2 on ACP7x platforms */
pdm_dev = acpi_find_child_device(adev, ACP7X_DMIC_ADDR, 0);
if (pdm_dev)
@@ -1379,6 +1383,7 @@ int amd_sof_acp7x_probe(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER, &obj))
adata->acp_sof_signed_firmware_image = obj->integer.value;
}
+#endif
sdev->dsp_box.offset = 0;
sdev->dsp_box.size = BOX_SIZE_512;
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: amd: fix building without CONFIG_ACPI
2026-09-25 13:10 [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: amd: fix building without CONFIG_ACPI Arnd Bergmann
@ 2026-09-25 13:32 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-09-25 16:37 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mario Limonciello @ 2026-09-25 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann, Liam Girdwood, Peter Ujfalusi, Bard Liao,
Daniel Baluta, Mark Brown, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai,
Vijendar Mukunda
Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Kai Vehmanen, Pierre-Louis Bossart,
sound-open-firmware, linux-sound, linux-kernel,
Rafael J. Wysocki
On 9/25/26 08:10, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> When ACPI is disabled, this driver runs into a build failure:
>
> sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c:1374:13: error: call to undeclared function 'acpi_find_child_device'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 1374 | pdm_dev = acpi_find_child_device(adev, ACP7X_DMIC_ADDR, 0);
>
> The code block is already guarded by an 'if (adev)' check that
> can only be true if ACPI is enabled, so add another #ifdef
> to match this.
>
> Fixes: 203ea76c4b0a ("ASoC: SOF: amd: add ACP7.B/7.F PDM controller scan and pdata propagation")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> I also tried adding ACPI Kconfig dependencies, but that quickly
> got out of hand since the acp module is selected by a number of
> drivers that then all need the same dependency.
>
> It may be possible to work around this in the ACPI code by adding
> a stub macro for acpi_find_child_device() that does nothing.
I reproduced the issue as you reported. The stub approach seems to work
too. I've posted that option here for Mark and Rafael to weigh out,
thanks for the idea.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20260925132031.4073551-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c b/sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c
> index b059039c9e0d..4b2d7cb244c9 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c
> @@ -1059,6 +1059,7 @@ int amd_sof_acp_resume(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS(amd_sof_acp_resume, "SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_COMMON");
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> static void acp_sof_scan_pdm_devices(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
> struct acpi_device *pdm_dev)
> {
> @@ -1083,6 +1084,7 @@ static void acp_sof_scan_pdm_devices(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
> }
> fwnode_handle_put(child);
> }
> +#endif
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_SOUNDWIRE)
> static int acp_sof_scan_sdw_devices(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u64 addr)
> @@ -1299,9 +1301,7 @@ int amd_sof_acp7x_probe(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
> struct pci_dev *pci = to_pci_dev(sdev->dev);
> struct acp_dev_data *adata;
> const struct sof_amd_acp_desc *chip;
> - const union acpi_object *obj;
> struct acpi_device *adev;
> - struct acpi_device *pdm_dev;
> unsigned int addr;
> unsigned int irqflags;
> int ret;
> @@ -1369,7 +1369,11 @@ int amd_sof_acp7x_probe(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
> adata->is_sdw_dev = true;
>
> skip_soundwire:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> if (adev) {
> + struct acpi_device *pdm_dev;
> + const union acpi_object *obj;
> +
> /* DMIC ACPI child address is 2 on ACP7x platforms */
> pdm_dev = acpi_find_child_device(adev, ACP7X_DMIC_ADDR, 0);
> if (pdm_dev)
> @@ -1379,6 +1383,7 @@ int amd_sof_acp7x_probe(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
> ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER, &obj))
> adata->acp_sof_signed_firmware_image = obj->integer.value;
> }
> +#endif
>
> sdev->dsp_box.offset = 0;
> sdev->dsp_box.size = BOX_SIZE_512;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: amd: fix building without CONFIG_ACPI
2026-09-25 13:32 ` Mario Limonciello
@ 2026-09-25 16:37 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-09-25 18:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mukunda,Vijendar @ 2026-09-25 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mario Limonciello, Arnd Bergmann, Liam Girdwood, Peter Ujfalusi,
Bard Liao, Daniel Baluta, Mark Brown, Jaroslav Kysela,
Takashi Iwai
Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Kai Vehmanen, Pierre-Louis Bossart,
sound-open-firmware, linux-sound, linux-kernel,
Rafael J. Wysocki
On 9/25/26 19:02, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>
>
> On 9/25/26 08:10, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>
>> When ACPI is disabled, this driver runs into a build failure:
>>
>> sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c:1374:13: error: call to undeclared function
>> 'acpi_find_child_device'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit
>> function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>> 1374 | pdm_dev = acpi_find_child_device(adev,
>> ACP7X_DMIC_ADDR, 0);
>>
Hi Arnd,
Thanks for catching and fixing this issue.
As the author of the original patch, I didn't receive the
original bug report. Was it sent to a limited recipient set,
or could there have been a mailing list delivery issue?
-
Vijendar
>> The code block is already guarded by an 'if (adev)' check that
>> can only be true if ACPI is enabled, so add another #ifdef
>> to match this.
>>
>> Fixes: 203ea76c4b0a ("ASoC: SOF: amd: add ACP7.B/7.F PDM controller
>> scan and pdata propagation")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> ---
>> I also tried adding ACPI Kconfig dependencies, but that quickly
>> got out of hand since the acp module is selected by a number of
>> drivers that then all need the same dependency.
>>
>> It may be possible to work around this in the ACPI code by adding
>> a stub macro for acpi_find_child_device() that does nothing.
>
> I reproduced the issue as you reported. The stub approach seems to
> work too. I've posted that option here for Mark and Rafael to weigh
> out, thanks for the idea.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20260925132031.4073551-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com/
>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> ---
>> sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c | 9 +++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c b/sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c
>> index b059039c9e0d..4b2d7cb244c9 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c
>> @@ -1059,6 +1059,7 @@ int amd_sof_acp_resume(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS(amd_sof_acp_resume, "SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_COMMON");
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> static void acp_sof_scan_pdm_devices(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
>> struct acpi_device *pdm_dev)
>> {
>> @@ -1083,6 +1084,7 @@ static void acp_sof_scan_pdm_devices(struct
>> snd_sof_dev *sdev,
>> }
>> fwnode_handle_put(child);
>> }
>> +#endif
>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_SOUNDWIRE)
>> static int acp_sof_scan_sdw_devices(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u64
>> addr)
>> @@ -1299,9 +1301,7 @@ int amd_sof_acp7x_probe(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
>> struct pci_dev *pci = to_pci_dev(sdev->dev);
>> struct acp_dev_data *adata;
>> const struct sof_amd_acp_desc *chip;
>> - const union acpi_object *obj;
>> struct acpi_device *adev;
>> - struct acpi_device *pdm_dev;
>> unsigned int addr;
>> unsigned int irqflags;
>> int ret;
>> @@ -1369,7 +1369,11 @@ int amd_sof_acp7x_probe(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
>> adata->is_sdw_dev = true;
>> skip_soundwire:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> if (adev) {
>> + struct acpi_device *pdm_dev;
>> + const union acpi_object *obj;
>> +
>> /* DMIC ACPI child address is 2 on ACP7x platforms */
>> pdm_dev = acpi_find_child_device(adev, ACP7X_DMIC_ADDR, 0);
>> if (pdm_dev)
>> @@ -1379,6 +1383,7 @@ int amd_sof_acp7x_probe(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
>> ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER, &obj))
>> adata->acp_sof_signed_firmware_image = obj->integer.value;
>> }
>> +#endif
>> sdev->dsp_box.offset = 0;
>> sdev->dsp_box.size = BOX_SIZE_512;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: amd: fix building without CONFIG_ACPI
2026-09-25 16:37 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
@ 2026-09-25 18:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2026-09-25 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vijendar Mukunda, Mario Limonciello, Arnd Bergmann,
Liam Girdwood, Peter Ujfalusi, Bard Liao, Daniel Baluta,
Mark Brown, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai
Cc: Kai Vehmanen, Pierre-Louis Bossart, sound-open-firmware,
linux-sound, linux-kernel, Rafael J . Wysocki
On Fri, Sep 25, 2026, at 18:37, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
> On 9/25/26 19:02, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> On 9/25/26 08:10, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>>
>>> When ACPI is disabled, this driver runs into a build failure:
>>>
>>> sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c:1374:13: error: call to undeclared function
>>> 'acpi_find_child_device'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit
>>> function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>>> 1374 | pdm_dev = acpi_find_child_device(adev,
>>> ACP7X_DMIC_ADDR, 0);
>>>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Thanks for catching and fixing this issue.
> As the author of the original patch, I didn't receive the
> original bug report. Was it sent to a limited recipient set,
> or could there have been a mailing list delivery issue?
No idea, my report is in the archive, and I assume that is how
Mario saw it:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sound/20260925131104.118993-1-arnd@kernel.org/
I only ran into the problem on today's linux-next during
randconfig testing.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-25 18:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-25 13:10 [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: amd: fix building without CONFIG_ACPI Arnd Bergmann
2026-09-25 13:32 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-09-25 16:37 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-09-25 18:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®