From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: "Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v3 09/11] cgroup/cpuset: Release invalid isolated CPUs with a shrunk root partition parent
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2026 19:56:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2751eb89-c34c-449f-893c-2e1836e3a610@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261025214449.310715-10-longman@redhat.com>
On 10/25/26 5:44 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> It is also reported by sashiko that there may be leakages of isolated
> CPUs when a root partition parent shrinks its effective_xcpus with
> isolated partition children. Leakage here means that isolated_cpus may
> contain extra CPUs that are not in any isolated partitions and not boot
> time isolated. Those CPUs cannot be used in any isolated partitions
> anymore.
>
> There are 2 different cases here. The effective_xcpus becomes empty and
> the isolated partition should be invalidated in this case. Alternatively
> some of its effective_xcpus are not in parent's effective xcpus but
> still have some valid effective_xcpus left. The isolated partition can
> remain valid. In both cases, the invalid isolated CPUs will have to be
> released from isolated_cpus if appropriate.
>
> Fix that by calling isolated_cpus_release() to release those isolated
> CPUs from isolated_cpus.
>
> New test cases are added to test_cpuset_prs.sh to test this.
>
> Fixes: 11e5f407b64a ("cgroup/cpuset: Keep track of CPUs in isolated partitions")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> .../testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 6d224e614e74..3daab2381f04 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -2012,8 +2012,22 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
> *
> * A partition error happens when parent has tasks and all
> * its effective CPUs will have to be distributed out.
> + *
> + * For an isolated partition with a shrunk root partition parent
> + * we may need to return some or all of its isolated CPUs.
> */
> - if (nocpu || cpumask_empty(tmp->delmask)) {
> + nocpu |= cpumask_empty(tmp->delmask);
> + if ((parent_prs == PRS_ROOT) && (old_prs == PRS_ISOLATED)) {
> + cpumask_clear(tmp->addmask);
> + if (nocpu)
> + cpumask_copy(tmp->addmask, cs->effective_xcpus);
> + else if (!cpumask_subset(cs->effective_xcpus, parent->effective_xcpus))
> + cpumask_andnot(tmp->addmask, cs->effective_cpus,
> + parent->effective_xcpus);
> + if (!cpumask_empty(tmp->addmask))
> + isolated_cpus_release(cs, tmp->addmask);
> + }
> + if (nocpu) {
> part_error = PERR_NOCPUS;
> if (is_partition_valid(cs))
> adding = cpumask_and(tmp->addmask,
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> index d7d0bef0a17a..ceb1a3b4f94e 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> @@ -522,6 +522,12 @@ TEST_MATRIX=(
> # its effective xcpus will be removed from isolated_cpus.
> " C1-4:P1 C3-4:P2 . . T:C3-4 . . . 0 A1:3-4|A2:3-4 A1:P1|A2:P-2 ."
>
> + # When a root partition parent with an isolated partition child is shrunk
> + # so that its effective xcpus is no longer a superset of its child effective
> + # xcpus, the invalid isolated CPUs should be removed from cpuset.cpus.isolated.
> + " C1-4:P1 C3-4:P2 . . T:C4-6 . . . 0 A1:5-6|A2:4 A1:P1|A2:P2 4"
> + " C1-4:P1 C1-2:P2 . . T:C4-6 . . . 0 A1:4-6|A2:4-6 A1:P1|A2:P-2 ."
> +
> #
> # old-A1 old-A2 old-A3 old-B1 new-A1 new-A2 new-A3 new-B1 fail ECPUs Pstate ISOLCPUS
> # ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- ----- ------ --------
I am sorry that there is a typo in this patch. I have send out a v3.1
version with the fixed code.
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-25 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-25 21:44 [PATCH-next v3 00/11] cgroup/cpuset: Miscellaneous bug fixes & cleanup Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 01/11] cgroup/cpuset: Find furthest isolated ancestor for invalidated isolated partition Waiman Long
2026-10-26 6:33 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 02/11] cgroup/cpuset: Properly compute effective xcpus in update_parent_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 6:39 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 03/11] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect effective_cpus bug in update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 6:46 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 04/11] cgroup/cpuset: Minor fixes to prstate_housekeeping_conflict() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 6:57 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 05/11] selftests/cgroup: Check for a single range nohz_full CPUs before running test matrix Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 06/11] cgroup/cpuset: Prevent recursive call of remote_cpus_update() via update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 07/11] cgroup/cpuset: Make sure compute_partition_effective_cpumask() is only called for valid partition Waiman Long
2026-10-26 7:14 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 08/11] cgroup/cpuset: Release invalid isolated CPUs in compute_partition_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 8:49 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 09/11] cgroup/cpuset: Release invalid isolated CPUs with a shrunk root partition parent Waiman Long
2026-10-25 23:53 ` [PATCH-next v3.1 " Waiman Long
2026-10-26 8:51 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 23:56 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 10/11] cgroup/cpuset: Relocate compute_*effective_cpumask() and compute_effective_nodemask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 9:08 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 11/11] cgroup/cpuset: Integrate compute_partition_effective_cpumask() into compute_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 9:44 ` Guopeng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2751eb89-c34c-449f-893c-2e1836e3a610@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®