mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v3 10/11] cgroup/cpuset: Relocate compute_*effective_cpumask() and compute_effective_nodemask()
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 17:08:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2eb44d83-b5ff-4a6e-94ae-956993da48ea@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261025214449.310715-11-longman@redhat.com>



在 2026/10/26 05:44, Waiman Long 写道:
> Relocate compute_partition_effective_cpumask(),
> compute_effective_cpumask(), and compute_effective_nodemask() together so
> that compute_effective_cpumask() and compute_partition_effective_cpumask()
> can be further integrated together. There is no functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 212 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 3daab2381f04..f37d929616a6 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -1135,43 +1135,6 @@ void cpuset_update_tasks_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *new_cpus)
>  	css_task_iter_end(&it);
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * compute_effective_cpumask - Compute the effective cpumask of the cpuset
> - * @new_cpus: the temp variable for the new effective_cpus mask
> - * @cs: the cpuset the need to recompute the new effective_cpus mask
> - * @parent: the parent cpuset
> - *
> - * For v2, the parent's effective_cpus is inherited if cpumask is empty.
> - * The result is valid only if the given cpuset isn't a partition root.
> - */
> -static void compute_effective_cpumask(struct cpumask *new_cpus,
> -				      struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *parent)
> -{
> -	bool has_cpus;
> -
> -	has_cpus = cpumask_and(new_cpus, cs->cpus_allowed, parent->effective_cpus);
> -	if (!has_cpus && is_in_v2_mode())
> -		cpumask_copy(new_cpus, parent->effective_cpus);
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * compute_effective_nodemask - Compute the effective nodemask of the cpuset
> - * @new_mems: the temp variable for the new effective_mems mask
> - * @cs: the cpuset the need to recompute the new effective_mems mask
> - * @parent: the parent cpuset
> - *
> - * For v2, the parent's effective_mems is inherited if nodemask is empty.
> - */
> -static void compute_effective_nodemask(nodemask_t *new_mems,
> -				       struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *parent)
> -{
> -	bool has_mems;
> -
> -	has_mems = nodes_and(*new_mems, cs->mems_allowed, parent->effective_mems);
> -	if (!has_mems && is_in_v2_mode())
> -		nodes_copy(*new_mems, parent->effective_mems);
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Commands for update_parent_effective_cpumask
>   */
> @@ -1622,6 +1585,112 @@ static int compute_trialcs_excpus(struct cpuset *trialcs, struct cpuset *cs)
>  	return rm_siblings_excl_cpus(parent, cs, excpus);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * compute_partition_effective_cpumask - compute effective_cpus for partition
> + * @cs: partition root cpuset
> + * @new_ecpus: previously computed effective_cpus to be updated
> + *
> + * Compute the effective_cpus of a partition root by scanning effective_xcpus
> + * of child partition roots and excluding their effective_xcpus.
> + *
> + * This has the side effect of invalidating valid child partition roots,
> + * if necessary. Since it is called from either cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks()
> + * or update_cpumasks_hier() where parent and children are modified
> + * successively, we don't need to call update_parent_effective_cpumask()
> + * and the child's effective_cpus will be updated in later iterations.
> + */
> +static void compute_partition_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs,
> +						struct cpumask *new_ecpus)
> +{
> +	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> +	struct cpuset *child;
> +	bool populated = partition_is_populated(cs, NULL);
> +
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_partition_valid(cs));
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Check child partition roots to see if they should be invalidated
> +	 * when all the effective_cpus will be used up and cs is populated.
> +	 * It is better to sacrifice a child partition root than invalidating
> +	 * the whole subtree.
> +	 *
> +	 * Return early if the effective_cpus is already empty.
> +	 */
> +	compute_excpus(cs, new_ecpus);
> +	if (!cpumask_and(new_ecpus, new_ecpus, cpu_active_mask))
> +		return;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	cpuset_for_each_child(child, css, cs) {
> +		if (!is_partition_valid(child))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * There shouldn't be a remote partition underneath another
> +		 * partition root.
> +		 */
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(is_remote_partition(child));
> +		if (populated && cpumask_subset(new_ecpus, child->effective_xcpus)) {
> +			int old_prs = child->partition_root_state;
> +			int parent_prs = cs->partition_root_state;
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Invalidate child partition and update isolated_cpus
> +			 * if necessary.
> +			 */
> +			spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
> +			WRITE_ONCE(child->prs_err, PERR_NOCPUS);
> +			if ((old_prs == PRS_ISOLATED) && (parent_prs == PRS_ROOT))
> +				isolated_cpus_update(PRS_ISOLATED, PRS_ROOT,
> +						     child->effective_xcpus);
> +			child->partition_root_state = -old_prs;
> +			spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
> +			notify_partition_change(child, old_prs);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +		cpumask_andnot(new_ecpus, new_ecpus,
> +			       child->effective_xcpus);
> +	}
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * compute_effective_cpumask - Compute the effective cpumask of the cpuset
> + * @new_cpus: the temp variable for the new effective_cpus mask
> + * @cs: the cpuset the need to recompute the new effective_cpus mask
> + * @parent: the parent cpuset
> + *
> + * For v2, the parent's effective_cpus is inherited if cpumask is empty.
> + * The result is valid only if the given cpuset isn't a partition root.
> + */
> +static void compute_effective_cpumask(struct cpumask *new_cpus,
> +				      struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *parent)
> +{
> +	bool has_cpus;
> +
> +	has_cpus = cpumask_and(new_cpus, cs->cpus_allowed, parent->effective_cpus);
> +	if (!has_cpus && is_in_v2_mode())
> +		cpumask_copy(new_cpus, parent->effective_cpus);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * compute_effective_nodemask - Compute the effective nodemask of the cpuset
> + * @new_mems: the temp variable for the new effective_mems mask
> + * @cs: the cpuset the need to recompute the new effective_mems mask
> + * @parent: the parent cpuset
> + *
> + * For v2, the parent's effective_mems is inherited if nodemask is empty.
> + */
> +static void compute_effective_nodemask(nodemask_t *new_mems,
> +				       struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *parent)
> +{
> +	bool has_mems;
> +
> +	has_mems = nodes_and(*new_mems, cs->mems_allowed, parent->effective_mems);
> +	if (!has_mems && is_in_v2_mode())
> +		nodes_copy(*new_mems, parent->effective_mems);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * remote_partition_enable - Enable current cpuset as a remote partition root
>   * @cs: the cpuset to update
> @@ -2145,75 +2214,6 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * compute_partition_effective_cpumask - compute effective_cpus for partition
> - * @cs: partition root cpuset
> - * @new_ecpus: previously computed effective_cpus to be updated
> - *
> - * Compute the effective_cpus of a partition root by scanning effective_xcpus
> - * of child partition roots and excluding their effective_xcpus.
> - *
> - * This has the side effect of invalidating valid child partition roots,
> - * if necessary. Since it is called from either cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks()
> - * or update_cpumasks_hier() where parent and children are modified
> - * successively, we don't need to call update_parent_effective_cpumask()
> - * and the child's effective_cpus will be updated in later iterations.
> - */
> -static void compute_partition_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs,
> -						struct cpumask *new_ecpus)
> -{
> -	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> -	struct cpuset *child;
> -	bool populated = partition_is_populated(cs, NULL);
> -
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_partition_valid(cs));
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Check child partition roots to see if they should be invalidated
> -	 * when all the effective_cpus will be used up and cs is populated.
> -	 * It is better to sacrifice a child partition root than invalidating
> -	 * the whole subtree.
> -	 *
> -	 * Return early if the effective_cpus is already empty.
> -	 */
> -	compute_excpus(cs, new_ecpus);
> -	if (!cpumask_and(new_ecpus, new_ecpus, cpu_active_mask))
> -		return;
> -
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> -	cpuset_for_each_child(child, css, cs) {
> -		if (!is_partition_valid(child))
> -			continue;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * There shouldn't be a remote partition underneath another
> -		 * partition root.
> -		 */
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(is_remote_partition(child));
> -		if (populated && cpumask_subset(new_ecpus, child->effective_xcpus)) {
> -			int old_prs = child->partition_root_state;
> -			int parent_prs = cs->partition_root_state;
> -
> -			/*
> -			 * Invalidate child partition and update isolated_cpus
> -			 * if necessary.
> -			 */
> -			spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
> -			WRITE_ONCE(child->prs_err, PERR_NOCPUS);
> -			if ((old_prs == PRS_ISOLATED) && (parent_prs == PRS_ROOT))
> -				isolated_cpus_update(PRS_ISOLATED, PRS_ROOT,
> -						     child->effective_xcpus);
> -			child->partition_root_state = -old_prs;
> -			spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
> -			notify_partition_change(child, old_prs);
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -		cpumask_andnot(new_ecpus, new_ecpus,
> -			       child->effective_xcpus);
> -	}
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * update_cpumasks_hier - Update effective cpumasks and tasks in the subtree
>   * @cs:  the cpuset to consider


Acked-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>

Thanks,
Guopeng

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-26  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-25 21:44 [PATCH-next v3 00/11] cgroup/cpuset: Miscellaneous bug fixes & cleanup Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 01/11] cgroup/cpuset: Find furthest isolated ancestor for invalidated isolated partition Waiman Long
2026-10-26  6:33   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 02/11] cgroup/cpuset: Properly compute effective xcpus in update_parent_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  6:39   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 03/11] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect effective_cpus bug in update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  6:46   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 04/11] cgroup/cpuset: Minor fixes to prstate_housekeeping_conflict() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  6:57   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 05/11] selftests/cgroup: Check for a single range nohz_full CPUs before running test matrix Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 06/11] cgroup/cpuset: Prevent recursive call of remote_cpus_update() via update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 07/11] cgroup/cpuset: Make sure compute_partition_effective_cpumask() is only called for valid partition Waiman Long
2026-10-26  7:14   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 08/11] cgroup/cpuset: Release invalid isolated CPUs in compute_partition_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  8:49   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 09/11] cgroup/cpuset: Release invalid isolated CPUs with a shrunk root partition parent Waiman Long
2026-10-25 23:53   ` [PATCH-next v3.1 " Waiman Long
2026-10-26  8:51     ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 23:56   ` [PATCH-next v3 " Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 10/11] cgroup/cpuset: Relocate compute_*effective_cpumask() and compute_effective_nodemask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  9:08   ` Guopeng Zhang [this message]
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 11/11] cgroup/cpuset: Integrate compute_partition_effective_cpumask() into compute_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  9:44   ` Guopeng Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2eb44d83-b5ff-4a6e-94ae-956993da48ea@linux.dev \
    --to=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®