From: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v3 10/11] cgroup/cpuset: Relocate compute_*effective_cpumask() and compute_effective_nodemask()
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 17:08:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2eb44d83-b5ff-4a6e-94ae-956993da48ea@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261025214449.310715-11-longman@redhat.com>
在 2026/10/26 05:44, Waiman Long 写道:
> Relocate compute_partition_effective_cpumask(),
> compute_effective_cpumask(), and compute_effective_nodemask() together so
> that compute_effective_cpumask() and compute_partition_effective_cpumask()
> can be further integrated together. There is no functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 212 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 3daab2381f04..f37d929616a6 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -1135,43 +1135,6 @@ void cpuset_update_tasks_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *new_cpus)
> css_task_iter_end(&it);
> }
>
> -/**
> - * compute_effective_cpumask - Compute the effective cpumask of the cpuset
> - * @new_cpus: the temp variable for the new effective_cpus mask
> - * @cs: the cpuset the need to recompute the new effective_cpus mask
> - * @parent: the parent cpuset
> - *
> - * For v2, the parent's effective_cpus is inherited if cpumask is empty.
> - * The result is valid only if the given cpuset isn't a partition root.
> - */
> -static void compute_effective_cpumask(struct cpumask *new_cpus,
> - struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *parent)
> -{
> - bool has_cpus;
> -
> - has_cpus = cpumask_and(new_cpus, cs->cpus_allowed, parent->effective_cpus);
> - if (!has_cpus && is_in_v2_mode())
> - cpumask_copy(new_cpus, parent->effective_cpus);
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * compute_effective_nodemask - Compute the effective nodemask of the cpuset
> - * @new_mems: the temp variable for the new effective_mems mask
> - * @cs: the cpuset the need to recompute the new effective_mems mask
> - * @parent: the parent cpuset
> - *
> - * For v2, the parent's effective_mems is inherited if nodemask is empty.
> - */
> -static void compute_effective_nodemask(nodemask_t *new_mems,
> - struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *parent)
> -{
> - bool has_mems;
> -
> - has_mems = nodes_and(*new_mems, cs->mems_allowed, parent->effective_mems);
> - if (!has_mems && is_in_v2_mode())
> - nodes_copy(*new_mems, parent->effective_mems);
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Commands for update_parent_effective_cpumask
> */
> @@ -1622,6 +1585,112 @@ static int compute_trialcs_excpus(struct cpuset *trialcs, struct cpuset *cs)
> return rm_siblings_excl_cpus(parent, cs, excpus);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * compute_partition_effective_cpumask - compute effective_cpus for partition
> + * @cs: partition root cpuset
> + * @new_ecpus: previously computed effective_cpus to be updated
> + *
> + * Compute the effective_cpus of a partition root by scanning effective_xcpus
> + * of child partition roots and excluding their effective_xcpus.
> + *
> + * This has the side effect of invalidating valid child partition roots,
> + * if necessary. Since it is called from either cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks()
> + * or update_cpumasks_hier() where parent and children are modified
> + * successively, we don't need to call update_parent_effective_cpumask()
> + * and the child's effective_cpus will be updated in later iterations.
> + */
> +static void compute_partition_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs,
> + struct cpumask *new_ecpus)
> +{
> + struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> + struct cpuset *child;
> + bool populated = partition_is_populated(cs, NULL);
> +
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_partition_valid(cs));
> +
> + /*
> + * Check child partition roots to see if they should be invalidated
> + * when all the effective_cpus will be used up and cs is populated.
> + * It is better to sacrifice a child partition root than invalidating
> + * the whole subtree.
> + *
> + * Return early if the effective_cpus is already empty.
> + */
> + compute_excpus(cs, new_ecpus);
> + if (!cpumask_and(new_ecpus, new_ecpus, cpu_active_mask))
> + return;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + cpuset_for_each_child(child, css, cs) {
> + if (!is_partition_valid(child))
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * There shouldn't be a remote partition underneath another
> + * partition root.
> + */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(is_remote_partition(child));
> + if (populated && cpumask_subset(new_ecpus, child->effective_xcpus)) {
> + int old_prs = child->partition_root_state;
> + int parent_prs = cs->partition_root_state;
> +
> + /*
> + * Invalidate child partition and update isolated_cpus
> + * if necessary.
> + */
> + spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
> + WRITE_ONCE(child->prs_err, PERR_NOCPUS);
> + if ((old_prs == PRS_ISOLATED) && (parent_prs == PRS_ROOT))
> + isolated_cpus_update(PRS_ISOLATED, PRS_ROOT,
> + child->effective_xcpus);
> + child->partition_root_state = -old_prs;
> + spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
> + notify_partition_change(child, old_prs);
> + continue;
> + }
> + cpumask_andnot(new_ecpus, new_ecpus,
> + child->effective_xcpus);
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * compute_effective_cpumask - Compute the effective cpumask of the cpuset
> + * @new_cpus: the temp variable for the new effective_cpus mask
> + * @cs: the cpuset the need to recompute the new effective_cpus mask
> + * @parent: the parent cpuset
> + *
> + * For v2, the parent's effective_cpus is inherited if cpumask is empty.
> + * The result is valid only if the given cpuset isn't a partition root.
> + */
> +static void compute_effective_cpumask(struct cpumask *new_cpus,
> + struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *parent)
> +{
> + bool has_cpus;
> +
> + has_cpus = cpumask_and(new_cpus, cs->cpus_allowed, parent->effective_cpus);
> + if (!has_cpus && is_in_v2_mode())
> + cpumask_copy(new_cpus, parent->effective_cpus);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * compute_effective_nodemask - Compute the effective nodemask of the cpuset
> + * @new_mems: the temp variable for the new effective_mems mask
> + * @cs: the cpuset the need to recompute the new effective_mems mask
> + * @parent: the parent cpuset
> + *
> + * For v2, the parent's effective_mems is inherited if nodemask is empty.
> + */
> +static void compute_effective_nodemask(nodemask_t *new_mems,
> + struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *parent)
> +{
> + bool has_mems;
> +
> + has_mems = nodes_and(*new_mems, cs->mems_allowed, parent->effective_mems);
> + if (!has_mems && is_in_v2_mode())
> + nodes_copy(*new_mems, parent->effective_mems);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * remote_partition_enable - Enable current cpuset as a remote partition root
> * @cs: the cpuset to update
> @@ -2145,75 +2214,6 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * compute_partition_effective_cpumask - compute effective_cpus for partition
> - * @cs: partition root cpuset
> - * @new_ecpus: previously computed effective_cpus to be updated
> - *
> - * Compute the effective_cpus of a partition root by scanning effective_xcpus
> - * of child partition roots and excluding their effective_xcpus.
> - *
> - * This has the side effect of invalidating valid child partition roots,
> - * if necessary. Since it is called from either cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks()
> - * or update_cpumasks_hier() where parent and children are modified
> - * successively, we don't need to call update_parent_effective_cpumask()
> - * and the child's effective_cpus will be updated in later iterations.
> - */
> -static void compute_partition_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs,
> - struct cpumask *new_ecpus)
> -{
> - struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> - struct cpuset *child;
> - bool populated = partition_is_populated(cs, NULL);
> -
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_partition_valid(cs));
> -
> - /*
> - * Check child partition roots to see if they should be invalidated
> - * when all the effective_cpus will be used up and cs is populated.
> - * It is better to sacrifice a child partition root than invalidating
> - * the whole subtree.
> - *
> - * Return early if the effective_cpus is already empty.
> - */
> - compute_excpus(cs, new_ecpus);
> - if (!cpumask_and(new_ecpus, new_ecpus, cpu_active_mask))
> - return;
> -
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - cpuset_for_each_child(child, css, cs) {
> - if (!is_partition_valid(child))
> - continue;
> -
> - /*
> - * There shouldn't be a remote partition underneath another
> - * partition root.
> - */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(is_remote_partition(child));
> - if (populated && cpumask_subset(new_ecpus, child->effective_xcpus)) {
> - int old_prs = child->partition_root_state;
> - int parent_prs = cs->partition_root_state;
> -
> - /*
> - * Invalidate child partition and update isolated_cpus
> - * if necessary.
> - */
> - spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
> - WRITE_ONCE(child->prs_err, PERR_NOCPUS);
> - if ((old_prs == PRS_ISOLATED) && (parent_prs == PRS_ROOT))
> - isolated_cpus_update(PRS_ISOLATED, PRS_ROOT,
> - child->effective_xcpus);
> - child->partition_root_state = -old_prs;
> - spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
> - notify_partition_change(child, old_prs);
> - continue;
> - }
> - cpumask_andnot(new_ecpus, new_ecpus,
> - child->effective_xcpus);
> - }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> -}
> -
> /*
> * update_cpumasks_hier - Update effective cpumasks and tasks in the subtree
> * @cs: the cpuset to consider
Acked-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
Thanks,
Guopeng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-25 21:44 [PATCH-next v3 00/11] cgroup/cpuset: Miscellaneous bug fixes & cleanup Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 01/11] cgroup/cpuset: Find furthest isolated ancestor for invalidated isolated partition Waiman Long
2026-10-26 6:33 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 02/11] cgroup/cpuset: Properly compute effective xcpus in update_parent_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 6:39 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 03/11] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect effective_cpus bug in update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 6:46 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 04/11] cgroup/cpuset: Minor fixes to prstate_housekeeping_conflict() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 6:57 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 05/11] selftests/cgroup: Check for a single range nohz_full CPUs before running test matrix Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 06/11] cgroup/cpuset: Prevent recursive call of remote_cpus_update() via update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 07/11] cgroup/cpuset: Make sure compute_partition_effective_cpumask() is only called for valid partition Waiman Long
2026-10-26 7:14 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 08/11] cgroup/cpuset: Release invalid isolated CPUs in compute_partition_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 8:49 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 09/11] cgroup/cpuset: Release invalid isolated CPUs with a shrunk root partition parent Waiman Long
2026-10-25 23:53 ` [PATCH-next v3.1 " Waiman Long
2026-10-26 8:51 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 23:56 ` [PATCH-next v3 " Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 10/11] cgroup/cpuset: Relocate compute_*effective_cpumask() and compute_effective_nodemask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 9:08 ` Guopeng Zhang [this message]
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 11/11] cgroup/cpuset: Integrate compute_partition_effective_cpumask() into compute_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 9:44 ` Guopeng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2eb44d83-b5ff-4a6e-94ae-956993da48ea@linux.dev \
--to=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®