From: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v3 03/11] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect effective_cpus bug in update_cpumasks_hier()
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 14:46:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a72f4a2d-4028-4bf9-906e-e270ab21623b@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261025214449.310715-4-longman@redhat.com>
在 2026/10/26 05:44, Waiman Long 写道:
> With the introduction of cpuset.cpus.exclusive, the computation of
> effective_cpus differs depending on if a cpuset is a valid partition
> root or not.
>
> In update_cpumasks_hier(), effective_cpus is computed early
> to check if the current subtree can be skipped. Later on
> update_parent_effective_cpumask() may be called which can change the
> partition state from valid to invalid or vice versa. If the partition
> state changes, the previously computed effective_cpus may no longer be
> valid. Fix that by recomputing effective_cpus again when that happens.
>
> Also add a new test case into test_cpuset_prs.sh to verify this change.
>
> Fixes: e2ffe502ba45 ("cgroup/cpuset: Add cpuset.cpus.exclusive for v2")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 10 ++++++++--
> tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index b850aba4d907..37bc79d0c647 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -2327,10 +2327,16 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp,
> if (update_parent) {
> update_parent_effective_cpumask(cp, partcmd_update, NULL, tmp);
> /*
> - * The cpuset partition_root_state may become
> - * invalid. Capture it.
> + * Capture current partition_root_state as it may have
> + * changed. Recompute effective cpumask if changed.
> */
> new_prs = cp->partition_root_state;
> + if (new_prs != old_prs) {
> + if (new_prs > 0)
> + compute_partition_effective_cpumask(cp, tmp->new_cpus);
> + else
> + compute_effective_cpumask(tmp->new_cpus, cp, parent);
> + }
> }
>
> spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> index 8bdda955b4a7..f4eb984752a0 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> @@ -364,6 +364,9 @@ TEST_MATRIX=(
> " C1-4:X2-4 C2-4:X3-4:P1 C3-4:X4:P2 \
> . . X5 . . 0 A1:1-4|A2:2-4|A3:3-4 \
> A1:P0|A2:P-1|A3:P-2 ."
> + " C1-5:X3-5:P2 C3-5:X4-5:P2 C4-5:X5:P2 \
> + . X1-4 . . . 0 A1:1-3|A2:4|A3:4 \
> + A1:P2|A2:P2|A3:P-2 1-4"
> " C1-4:X2-4 C1-4:X3-4:P1 C3-4:X4:P2 \
> . . . X1 . 0 A1:1-2|A2:3-4|A3:3-4 \
> A1:P0|A2:P1|A3:P-2 ."
Reviewed-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
Thanks,
Guopeng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-25 21:44 [PATCH-next v3 00/11] cgroup/cpuset: Miscellaneous bug fixes & cleanup Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 01/11] cgroup/cpuset: Find furthest isolated ancestor for invalidated isolated partition Waiman Long
2026-10-26 6:33 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 02/11] cgroup/cpuset: Properly compute effective xcpus in update_parent_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 6:39 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 03/11] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect effective_cpus bug in update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 6:46 ` Guopeng Zhang [this message]
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 04/11] cgroup/cpuset: Minor fixes to prstate_housekeeping_conflict() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 6:57 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 05/11] selftests/cgroup: Check for a single range nohz_full CPUs before running test matrix Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 06/11] cgroup/cpuset: Prevent recursive call of remote_cpus_update() via update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 07/11] cgroup/cpuset: Make sure compute_partition_effective_cpumask() is only called for valid partition Waiman Long
2026-10-26 7:14 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 08/11] cgroup/cpuset: Release invalid isolated CPUs in compute_partition_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 8:49 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 09/11] cgroup/cpuset: Release invalid isolated CPUs with a shrunk root partition parent Waiman Long
2026-10-25 23:53 ` [PATCH-next v3.1 " Waiman Long
2026-10-26 8:51 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 23:56 ` [PATCH-next v3 " Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 10/11] cgroup/cpuset: Relocate compute_*effective_cpumask() and compute_effective_nodemask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 9:08 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 11/11] cgroup/cpuset: Integrate compute_partition_effective_cpumask() into compute_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26 9:44 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-26 18:26 ` [PATCH-next v3 00/11] cgroup/cpuset: Miscellaneous bug fixes & cleanup Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a72f4a2d-4028-4bf9-906e-e270ab21623b@linux.dev \
--to=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®