mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v3 11/11] cgroup/cpuset: Integrate compute_partition_effective_cpumask() into compute_effective_cpumask()
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 17:44:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dac64e77-60b8-47ec-935e-6aea1b38acf0@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261025214449.310715-12-longman@redhat.com>



在 2026/10/26 05:44, Waiman Long 写道:
> Update compute_effective_cpumask() to call
> compute_partition_effective_cpumask() directly if the given cpuset is
> a valid remote or local partition root. This simplifies the call sites
> where they are being involved. No functional change is expected.
> 
> Suggested-by: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 37 ++++++++++---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index f37d929616a6..2598a0e2d667 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -1606,8 +1606,6 @@ static void compute_partition_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs,
>  	struct cpuset *child;
>  	bool populated = partition_is_populated(cs, NULL);
>  
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_partition_valid(cs));
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Check child partition roots to see if they should be invalidated
>  	 * when all the effective_cpus will be used up and cs is populated.
> @@ -1668,6 +1666,10 @@ static void compute_effective_cpumask(struct cpumask *new_cpus,
>  {
>  	bool has_cpus;
>  
> +	if (is_remote_partition(cs) ||
> +	    (is_partition_valid(cs) && is_partition_valid(parent)))
> +		return compute_partition_effective_cpumask(cs, new_cpus);
> +
>  	has_cpus = cpumask_and(new_cpus, cs->cpus_allowed, parent->effective_cpus);
>  	if (!has_cpus && is_in_v2_mode())
>  		cpumask_copy(new_cpus, parent->effective_cpus);
> @@ -2268,10 +2270,7 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp,
>  			remote = (new_prs == old_prs);
>  		}
>  
> -		if (remote || (is_partition_valid(parent) && is_partition_valid(cp)))
> -			compute_partition_effective_cpumask(cp, tmp->new_cpus);
> -		else
> -			compute_effective_cpumask(tmp->new_cpus, cp, parent);
> +		compute_effective_cpumask(tmp->new_cpus, cp, parent);
>  
>  		if (remote)
>  			goto get_css;	/* Ready to update cpuset data */
> @@ -2352,10 +2351,7 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp,
>  			 */
>  			new_prs = cp->partition_root_state;
>  			if (new_prs != old_prs) {
> -				if (new_prs > 0)
> -					compute_partition_effective_cpumask(cp, tmp->new_cpus);
> -				else
> -					compute_effective_cpumask(tmp->new_cpus, cp, parent);
> +				compute_effective_cpumask(tmp->new_cpus, cp, parent);
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> @@ -3987,7 +3983,6 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
>  	static nodemask_t new_mems;
>  	bool cpus_updated;
>  	bool mems_updated;
> -	bool remote;
>  	int partcmd = -1;
>  	struct cpuset *parent;
>  
> @@ -3999,21 +3994,12 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
>  	if (!tmp || !cs->partition_root_state)
>  		goto update_tasks;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Compute effective_cpus for valid partition root, may invalidate
> -	 * child partition roots if necessary.
> -	 */
> -	remote = is_remote_partition(cs);
> -	if (remote || (is_partition_valid(cs) && is_partition_valid(parent)))
> -		compute_partition_effective_cpumask(cs, &new_cpus);
> -
> -	if (remote && (cpumask_empty(subpartitions_cpus) ||
> -			(cpumask_empty(&new_cpus) &&
> -			 partition_is_populated(cs, NULL)))) {
> +	if (is_remote_partition(cs) && (cpumask_empty(subpartitions_cpus) ||
> +				       (cpumask_empty(&new_cpus) &&
> +					partition_is_populated(cs, NULL)))) {
>  		WRITE_ONCE(cs->prs_err, PERR_HOTPLUG);
>  		remote_partition_disable(cs, tmp);
>  		compute_effective_cpumask(&new_cpus, cs, parent);
> -		remote = false;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -4039,10 +4025,7 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
>  
>  	if (partcmd >= 0) {
>  		update_parent_effective_cpumask(cs, partcmd, NULL, tmp);
> -		if (is_partition_valid(cs)) {
> -			compute_partition_effective_cpumask(cs, &new_cpus);
> -			cpuset_force_rebuild();
> -		} else if (partcmd == partcmd_invalidate) {
> +		if (is_partition_valid(cs) || (partcmd == partcmd_invalidate)) {
>  			compute_effective_cpumask(&new_cpus, cs, parent);
>  			cpuset_force_rebuild();
>  		}

Acked-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>

Thanks,
Guopeng

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-26  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-25 21:44 [PATCH-next v3 00/11] cgroup/cpuset: Miscellaneous bug fixes & cleanup Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 01/11] cgroup/cpuset: Find furthest isolated ancestor for invalidated isolated partition Waiman Long
2026-10-26  6:33   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 02/11] cgroup/cpuset: Properly compute effective xcpus in update_parent_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  6:39   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 03/11] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect effective_cpus bug in update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  6:46   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 04/11] cgroup/cpuset: Minor fixes to prstate_housekeeping_conflict() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  6:57   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 05/11] selftests/cgroup: Check for a single range nohz_full CPUs before running test matrix Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 06/11] cgroup/cpuset: Prevent recursive call of remote_cpus_update() via update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 07/11] cgroup/cpuset: Make sure compute_partition_effective_cpumask() is only called for valid partition Waiman Long
2026-10-26  7:14   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 08/11] cgroup/cpuset: Release invalid isolated CPUs in compute_partition_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  8:49   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 09/11] cgroup/cpuset: Release invalid isolated CPUs with a shrunk root partition parent Waiman Long
2026-10-25 23:53   ` [PATCH-next v3.1 " Waiman Long
2026-10-26  8:51     ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 23:56   ` [PATCH-next v3 " Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 10/11] cgroup/cpuset: Relocate compute_*effective_cpumask() and compute_effective_nodemask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  9:08   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 11/11] cgroup/cpuset: Integrate compute_partition_effective_cpumask() into compute_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  9:44   ` Guopeng Zhang [this message]
2026-10-26 18:26 ` [PATCH-next v3 00/11] cgroup/cpuset: Miscellaneous bug fixes & cleanup Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dac64e77-60b8-47ec-935e-6aea1b38acf0@linux.dev \
    --to=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®