From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
Linux LEDs <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, johanneswueller@gmail.com,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Genes Lists <lists@sapience.com>
Subject: Re: Hung tasks due to a AB-BA deadlock between the leds_list_lock rwsem and the rtnl mutex
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 15:11:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a6045e2-031a-46b6-9943-eaae21d85e37@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01fc2e30-eafe-495c-a62d-402903fd3e2a@lunn.ch>
Hi,
On 5/31/24 2:54 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> I actually have been looking at a ledtrig-netdev lockdep warning yesterday
>> which I believe is the same thing. I'll include the lockdep trace below.
>>
>> According to lockdep there indeed is a ABBA (ish) cyclic deadlock with
>> the rtnl mutex vs led-triggers related locks. I believe that this problem
>> may be a pre-existing problem but this now actually gets hit in kernels >=
>> 6.9 because of commit 66601a29bb23 ("leds: class: If no default trigger is
>> given, make hw_control trigger the default trigger"). Before that commit
>> the "netdev" trigger would not be bound / set as phy LEDs trigger by default.
>>
>> +Cc Heiner Kallweit who authored that commit.
>>
>> The netdev trigger typically is not needed because the PHY LEDs are typically
>> under hw-control and the netdev trigger even tries to leave things that way
>> so setting it as the active trigger for the LED class device is basically
>> a no-op. I guess the goal of that commit is correctly have the triggers
>> file content reflect that the LED is controlled by a netdev and to allow
>> changing the hw-control mode without the user first needing to set netdev
>> as trigger before being able to change the mode.
>
> It was not the intention that this triggers is loaded for all
> systems.
Right note there are really 2 separate issues (or 1 issue
and one question) here:
1. The locking issue which this commit has exposed (but existed before)
2. If it is desirable to load / activate ledtrig-netdev by default on
quite a lot of machines where it does not really gain us anything ?
For now I think we should focus on 1.
Still about 2:
> It should only be those that actually have LEDs which can be
> controlled:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_leds.c: led_cdev->hw_control_trigger = "netdev";
> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_leds.c: led_cdev->hw_control_trigger = "netdev";
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_leds.c: led_cdev->hw_control_trigger = "netdev";
> drivers/net/dsa/qca/qca8k-leds.c: port_led->cdev.hw_control_trigger = "netdev";
> drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c: cdev->hw_control_trigger = "netdev";
Well those drivers combined, esp. with the generic phy_device in there
does mean that the ledtrig-netdev module now gets loaded on a whole lot
of x86 machines where before it would not. On one hand those machines
are plenty powerful typically, so what is one more module. OTOH I don't
think many users if any at all want to change the hwcontrol mode for
those LEDs...
> Reverting this patch does seem like a good way forward, but i would
> also like to give Heiner a little bit of time to see if he has a quick
> real fix.
Ack.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-31 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-30 12:53 6.9.3 Hung tasks Genes Lists
2024-05-30 13:36 ` Genes Lists
2024-05-30 14:04 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-05-30 16:23 ` Genes Lists
2024-05-31 8:39 ` Hung tasks due to a AB-BA deadlock between the leds_list_lock rwsem and the rtnl mutex (was: 6.9.3 Hung tasks) Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-05-31 9:50 ` Hung tasks due to a AB-BA deadlock between the leds_list_lock rwsem and the rtnl mutex Hans de Goede
2024-05-31 10:22 ` Hans de Goede
2024-06-01 20:05 ` Hans de Goede
2024-05-31 11:55 ` Genes Lists
2024-05-31 12:54 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-31 13:11 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2024-05-31 13:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-31 13:36 ` Hans de Goede
2024-06-06 12:01 ` Hans de Goede
2024-06-06 13:12 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-06-06 13:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-06 14:25 ` Genes Lists
2024-06-07 10:22 ` Hans de Goede
2024-06-07 11:27 ` Genes Lists
2024-06-07 10:19 ` Hans de Goede
2024-06-24 19:57 ` Heiner Kallweit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a6045e2-031a-46b6-9943-eaae21d85e37@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=johanneswueller@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=lists@sapience.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®