mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shah, Amit" <Amit.Shah@amd.com>
To: "pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com"
	<pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	"jpoimboe@kernel.org" <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	"amit@kernel.org" <amit@kernel.org>
Cc: "corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"kai.huang@intel.com" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>,
	"daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com" <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>,
	"boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
	"Das1, Sandipan" <Sandipan.Das@amd.com>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dwmw@amazon.co.uk" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Kaplan, David" <David.Kaplan@amd.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] x86: cpu/bugs: update SpectreRSB comments for AMD
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:15:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2eab0a67613c35ec1aea57b47f6808a507270ad6.camel@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241115181005.xxlebbykksmimgqj@jpoimboe>

On Fri, 2024-11-15 at 10:10 -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 09:50:47AM -0800, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> > This LGTM.
> > 
> > I think SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_RETPOLINE is placed in the wrong leg, it
> > doesn't need RSB filling on context switch, and only needs
> > VMEXIT_LITE.
> > Does below change on top of your patch look okay?
> 
> Yeah, I was wondering about that too.  Since it changes existing
> VMEXIT_LITE behavior I'll make it a separate patch.  And I'll
> probably
> do the comment changes in a separate patch as well.

So all of that looks good to me as well.  I think a standalone series
makes sense - maybe even for 6.13.  I'll base my patches on top of
yours.

Thanks!

		Amit

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-18 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-11 16:39 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for the ERAPS feature Amit Shah
2024-11-11 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] x86: cpu/bugs: update SpectreRSB comments for AMD Amit Shah
2024-11-11 17:01   ` Dave Hansen
2024-11-11 19:33   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-11-11 19:58     ` Kaplan, David
2024-11-11 20:39       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-11-11 20:40         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-11-12  0:30           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-11-12  0:29     ` Andrew Cooper
2024-11-12  1:46       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-11-12 11:58         ` Borislav Petkov
2024-11-13 21:24           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-11-13 21:37             ` Borislav Petkov
2024-11-14  0:43               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-11-14  7:47                 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-11-14  9:47                   ` Ingo Molnar
2024-11-14  9:54                     ` Borislav Petkov
2024-11-12 15:16         ` Shah, Amit
2024-11-12 21:43         ` Pawan Gupta
2024-11-13 20:21           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-11-14  1:55             ` Pawan Gupta
2024-11-14  2:31               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-11-14  8:01                 ` Pawan Gupta
2024-11-15  5:48                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-11-15 14:44                     ` Kaplan, David
2024-11-15 17:05                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-11-15 17:50                     ` Pawan Gupta
2024-11-15 18:10                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-11-18 10:15                         ` Shah, Amit [this message]
2024-11-11 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] x86: cpu/bugs: add support for AMD ERAPS feature Amit Shah
2024-11-11 18:57   ` Dave Hansen
2024-11-13 10:33     ` Shah, Amit
2024-11-11 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] x86: kvm: svm: add support for ERAPS and FLUSH_RAP_ON_VMRUN Amit Shah
2024-11-11 19:02   ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2eab0a67613c35ec1aea57b47f6808a507270ad6.camel@amd.com \
    --to=amit.shah@amd.com \
    --cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
    --cc=David.Kaplan@amd.com \
    --cc=Sandipan.Das@amd.com \
    --cc=Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=amit@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®