mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Blum <bblum@google.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Makes procs file writable to move all threads by tgid  at once
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 18:41:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f86c2480908071841h13009856hd8fcae167b1fadbf@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830908060440g2f6cbed6xdc54c7096cd3745e@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Paul Menage<menage@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Louis Rilling<Louis.Rilling@kerlabs.com> wrote:
>>
>> You meant signal_struct, right? sighand_struct can be shared by several
>> thread groups, while signal_struct can't.
>>
>
> No, I meant sighand_struct. I realise that it *can* be shared between
> processes, but I didn't think that NPTL actually did so. (Are there
> common cases of this happening?) And in cases where it was shared, it
> wouldn't affect correctness, but simply create the potential for a
> little more contention.
>
> I agree that signal_struct might in principle be a better place for
> it, but the first cacheline of signal_struct appears to be occupied
> with performance-sensitive things (a couple of counters and a queue
> used in do_wait()) already, whereas the first cacheline of
> sighand_struct only appears to be used incremented/decremented during
> fork/exit, and when delivering a bunch of mostly-fatal signals.
>
> But having said that, if having it in signal_struct isn't considered a
> potential performance hit, it would be fine there too.
>
> Paul
>

I'm presently rewriting the locking scheme here to have the rwsem live
in sighand_struct, and writing two new functions lock_threadgroup_fork
and unlock_threadgroup_fork (for use in cgroup_attach_proc) which will
live in cgroup.c but are generic enough that they could be used by
anybody who wants to do threadgroup-wide fork-sensitive changes. I'm
also having the fork_lock under an #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS, which could
be expanded to, say, CONFIG_FORK_LOCK_THREADGROUP (which CGROUPS would
depend upon) if somebody else ever wanted to use this lock as well.
For genericness, I'll have the down_read and up_read on the lock in
do_fork() directly (instead of cgroup_fork and cgroup_post_fork as it
is in this version of the patch).

If there are no more comments/discussion on the locking scheme, I'll
resubmit the patch series with these changes approximately Monday.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-08-08  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-31  1:51 [PATCH v2 0/6] CGroups: cgroup memberlist enhancement+fix Ben Blum
2009-07-31  1:51 ` [PATCH 1/6] Adds a read-only "procs" file similar to "tasks" that shows only unique tgids Ben Blum
2009-07-31  1:51 ` [PATCH 2/6] Ensures correct concurrent opening/reading of pidlists across pid namespaces Ben Blum
2009-07-31  1:51 ` [PATCH 3/6] Quick vmalloc vs kmalloc fix to the case where array size is too large Ben Blum
2009-07-31  1:51 ` [PATCH 4/6] Changes css_set freeing mechanism to be under RCU Ben Blum
2009-07-31  1:51 ` [PATCH 5/6] Lets ss->can_attach and ss->attach do whole threadgroups at a time Ben Blum
2009-08-03  2:22   ` Li Zefan
2009-08-04  0:35     ` Benjamin Blum
2009-07-31  1:51 ` [PATCH 6/6] Makes procs file writable to move all threads by tgid at once Ben Blum
2009-08-03  3:00   ` Li Zefan
2009-08-04  0:56     ` Benjamin Blum
2009-08-04  1:05       ` Paul Menage
2009-08-04  1:11         ` Benjamin Blum
2009-08-04  1:09       ` Li Zefan
2009-08-04  1:19         ` Benjamin Blum
2009-08-04  1:45           ` Li Zefan
2009-08-04  1:55             ` Paul Menage
2009-08-03 17:54   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-08-03 18:07     ` Paul Menage
2009-08-03 18:13     ` Benjamin Blum
2009-08-03 18:55       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-08-03 19:45         ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-08-03 19:55           ` Paul Menage
2009-08-04 14:01             ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-08-04 21:40             ` Matt Helsley
2009-08-04 18:48           ` Paul Menage
2009-08-04 19:01             ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-08-04 19:14             ` Benjamin Blum
2009-08-04 19:28               ` Paul Menage
2009-08-05 10:20                 ` Louis Rilling
2009-08-05 16:11                   ` Paul Menage
2009-08-05 16:42                     ` Louis Rilling
2009-08-05 16:53                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-06  0:01                       ` Benjamin Blum
2009-08-06  9:58                         ` Louis Rilling
2009-08-06 10:04                           ` Louis Rilling
2009-08-06 10:28                           ` Paul Menage
2009-08-06 10:34                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-06 10:42                               ` Paul Menage
2009-08-06 11:02                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-06 11:24                                   ` Paul Menage
2009-08-06 11:39                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-06 15:19                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-06 15:24                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-06 15:37                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-06 11:24                             ` Louis Rilling
2009-08-06 11:40                               ` Paul Menage
2009-08-06 14:54                                 ` Louis Rilling
2009-08-08  1:41                                 ` Benjamin Blum [this message]
2009-08-08  1:51                                   ` Benjamin Blum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2f86c2480908071841h13009856hd8fcae167b1fadbf@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bblum@google.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®