Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: sram: qcom,imem: Document Qualcomm IPQ SoC's IMEM compatibles

[Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 7/2/2025 3:49 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 02/07/2025 12:17, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
>> IMEM is present in the Qualcomm's IPQ SoCs as well. Document the same.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/qcom,imem.yaml | 6 ++++++
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> Where is the changelog? This is not a v1.

This is the v1. The series[1] I pointed out describes only for the 
IPQ5424 SoC. Since I have added few more SoCs, thought v1 is the 
appropriate numbering.

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20250610-wdt_reset_reason-v5-0-2d2835160ab5@oss.qualcomm.com/

>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/qcom,imem.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/qcom,imem.yaml
>> index 72d35e30c439ccf4901d937f838fe7c7a81f33b1..48e2f332e0e9fc9fa4147fa12d9c6c70a77fafda 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/qcom,imem.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/qcom,imem.yaml
>> @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ properties:
>>       items:
>>         - enum:
>>             - qcom,apq8064-imem
>> +          - qcom,ipq8074-imem
>> +          - qcom,ipq6018-imem
>> +          - qcom,ipq5018-imem
>> +          - qcom,ipq9574-imem
>> +          - qcom,ipq5332-imem
>> +          - qcom,ipq5424-imem
> Random order, no, follow existing style. This applies for every qcom
> binding and you received such feedbacks in the past.

Apologies — I arranged them based on the evolutionary order of SoCs. 
I’ll correct this in v2 and ensure it’s handled properly in the future.

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof