mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>
To: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
Cc: sekharan@us.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Srivatsa <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
	ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, balbir@in.ibm.com,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kingsley Cheung <kingsley@aurema.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC 3/5] sched: Add CPU rate hard caps
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 11:47:09 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <447FECFD.8000602@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <447FD2E1.7060605@bigpond.net.au>

>>>> Sure! You can check OpenVZ project (http://openvz.org) for example 
>>>> of required resource management. BTW, I must agree with other people 
>>>> here who noticed that per-process resource management is really 
>>>> useless and hard to use :(
>>
>>
>> I totally agree.
> 
> 
> "nice" seems to be doing quite nicely :-)
I'm sorry, but nice never looked "nice" to me.
Have you ever tried to "nice" apache server which spawns 500 
processes/threads on a loaded machine?
With nice you _can't_ impose limits or priority on the whole "apache".
The more apaches you have the more useless their priorites and nices are...

> To me this capping functionality is a similar functionality to that 
> provided by "nice" and all that's needed to make it useful is a command 
> (similar to "nice") that runs tasks with caps applied.  To that end I've 
> written a small script (attached) that does this.  As this is something 
> that a user might like to combine with "nice" the command has an option 
> for setting "nice" as well as caps.
> 
> Usage:
>         withcap [options] command [arguments ...]
>         withcap -h
> Options:
>         [-c <CPU rate soft cap>]
>         [-C <CPU rate hard cap>]
>         [-n <nice value>]
> 
>         -c Set CPU usage rate soft cap
>         -C Set CPU usage rate hard cap
>         -n Set nice value
>         -h Display this help

the same for this. you can't limit a _user_, only his processes.
Today I have 1 task and 20% limit is ok, tomorrow I have 10 tasks and 
this 20% limits changes nothing in the system.

Kirill

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-02  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-26  4:20 [RFC 0/5] sched: Add CPU rate caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26  4:20 ` [RFC 1/5] sched: Fix priority inheritence before CPU rate soft caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26  4:20 ` [RFC 2/5] sched: Add " Peter Williams
2006-05-26 10:48   ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 11:15     ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-26 11:17       ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 11:30         ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-26 13:55     ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27  6:31   ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-27  7:03     ` Peter Williams
2006-05-28  0:11       ` Peter Williams
2006-05-28  7:38         ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-28 13:35           ` Peter Williams
2006-05-28 14:42             ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-28 23:27               ` Peter Williams
2006-05-31 13:17                 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-05-31 23:39                   ` Peter Williams
2006-06-01  8:09                     ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-01 23:38                       ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02  1:35                         ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26  4:20 ` [RFC 3/5] sched: Add CPU rate hard caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26  6:58   ` Kari Hurtta
2006-05-27  1:00     ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 11:00   ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 13:59     ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 14:12       ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 14:23       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-27  0:16         ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27  9:28           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-28  2:09             ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27  6:48   ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-27  8:44     ` Peter Williams
2006-05-31 13:10       ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-05-31 15:59         ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-31 18:09           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-01  7:41           ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-01  8:34             ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-01 18:43               ` [ckrm-tech] " Chandra Seetharaman
2006-06-01 23:26                 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02  2:02                   ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-06-02  3:21                     ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02  8:32                       ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-02 13:30                         ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02 18:58                           ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-02 23:49                             ` Peter Williams
2006-06-03  4:59                               ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-02 19:06                       ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-06-03  0:04                         ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02  0:36                 ` Con Kolivas
2006-06-02  2:03                   ` [ckrm-tech] " Chandra Seetharaman
2006-06-02  5:55                 ` [ckrm-tech] [RFC 3/5] " Peter Williams
2006-06-02  7:47                   ` Kirill Korotaev [this message]
2006-06-02 13:34                     ` Peter Williams
2006-06-05 22:11                     ` Sam Vilain
2006-06-06  8:24                       ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-06  9:13                         ` Con Kolivas
2006-06-06  9:28                           ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-02  8:46                   ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-02 13:18                     ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02 14:47                       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-03  0:08                         ` Peter Williams
2006-06-03  6:02                           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-03 11:03                             ` Peter Williams
2006-06-06 11:26                         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-06-02  7:34                 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-02 21:23                   ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-01 23:47               ` Sam Vilain
2006-06-01 23:43           ` Peter Williams
2006-05-31 23:28         ` Peter Williams
2006-06-01  7:44           ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-01 23:21             ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26  4:21 ` [RFC 4/5] sched: Add procfs interface for CPU rate soft caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26  4:21 ` [RFC 5/5] sched: Add procfs interface for CPU rate hard caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26  8:04 ` [RFC 0/5] sched: Add CPU rate caps Mike Galbraith
2006-05-26 16:11   ` Björn Steinbrink
2006-05-28 22:46     ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-28 23:30       ` Peter Williams
2006-05-29  3:09         ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-29  3:41           ` Peter Williams
2006-05-29 21:16             ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-29 23:12               ` Peter Williams
2006-05-30  2:07                 ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-30  2:45                   ` Peter Williams
2006-05-30 22:05                     ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-30 23:22                       ` Peter Williams
2006-05-30 23:25                       ` Peter Williams
2006-06-05 23:56                       ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27  0:16   ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 10:41 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-27  1:28   ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27  1:42     ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 11:09 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 14:00   ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 11:29 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-27  1:40   ` Peter Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=447FECFD.8000602@openvz.org \
    --to=dev@openvz.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=kingsley@aurema.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
    --cc=rene.herman@keyaccess.nl \
    --cc=sam@vilain.net \
    --cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome