From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Qiliang Yuan <odys.yuan@gmail.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
"Shin'ichiro Kawasaki" <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: set QUEUE_FLAG_NO_ELV_SWITCH under the read lock in del_gendisk()
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 11:23:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44b0d0e5-b14f-4e6c-8e00-16b4af712b7d@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102-bug-nvme-remove-ns-async-v1-2-61780fee111c@gmail.com>
On 11/2/26 11:44 AM, Qiliang Yuan wrote:
> del_gendisk() takes the tag set's update_nr_hwq_lock for write to set
> QUEUE_FLAG_NO_ELV_SWITCH, then for read around __del_gendisk(). The
> write lock was there to wait for elevator switches from sysfs, which
> held the lock for read when the flag was added.
>
> When several disks of one tag set are deleted at once, as nvme does for
> the namespaces of a controller, each write lock waits for the other
> disks to get through __del_gendisk() under the read lock, and the
> deletions run one after another.
>
> Elevator switches from sysfs have taken update_nr_hwq_lock for write
> since commit 4ff58d6bc9dd4 ("block: serialize elevator changes for the
> same queue using a writer lock"), as updates of nr_hw_queues do. Set the
> flag under the read lock instead, which still waits for both and keeps
> them out.
Currently, there's a patch[1] in-review to change update_nr_hwq_lock from
write to read while switching elevator.
So the proposal in this patch may not work out if the changes in patch[1]
are accepted. I understand your proposed patchset but I'd recommend wait a
bit till we settle with the patch[1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261031044141.5569-1-laveeshb@laveeshbansal.com/
Thanks,
--Nilay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-02 6:14 [PATCH 0/2] nvme: delete controllers with many namespaces faster Qiliang Yuan
2026-11-02 6:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme: remove namespaces in parallel Qiliang Yuan
2026-11-02 7:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-02 8:00 ` Qiliang Yuan
2026-11-02 9:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-02 6:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: set QUEUE_FLAG_NO_ELV_SWITCH under the read lock in del_gendisk() Qiliang Yuan
2026-11-02 7:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-03 5:53 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2026-11-03 6:20 ` Qiliang Yuan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44b0d0e5-b14f-4e6c-8e00-16b4af712b7d@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=odys.yuan@gmail.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®