From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: "Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Will Drewry" <wad@chromium.org>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"Denys Vlasenko" <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
"X86 ML" <x86@kernel.org>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@plumgrid.com>,
"Denys Vlasenko" <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs"
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:31:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E8A98A020000780002B059@mail.emea.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXmSOmy55r4Ww2tc4MwtywwsWED_oP+dwBS1gTBja2yuA@mail.gmail.com>
>>> On 11.08.14 at 11:07, <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> How does one test the entry CFI annotations? The best that I know of
> is to single-step through using gdb attached to qemu and see whether
> backtraces seem to work.
Or have the kernel generate a backtrace from a suitable location and
check that the backtrace is correct (of course provided you have Dwarf
stack unwinding support in your kernel).
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-11 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-01 14:48 [PATCH 1/5] x86: entry_64.S: delete unused code Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: open-code register save/restore in trace_hardirqs thunks Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: entry_64.S: fold SAVE_ARGS_IRQ macro into its sole user Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 18:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs" Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 17:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-04 14:28 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-04 14:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 15:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 21:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-04 21:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-05 10:35 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-05 14:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-05 15:17 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-05 23:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-07 9:54 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 18:09 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-01 18:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-01 18:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-01 22:11 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 22:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-02 21:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-02 21:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-02 21:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-01 22:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-01 23:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-04 3:03 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-04 7:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-11 0:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-11 8:40 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 9:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-11 9:31 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2014-08-11 13:26 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-11 14:17 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 14:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-11 15:08 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 15:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-12 9:31 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-12 9:50 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: mass removal of ARGOFFSET Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: entry_64.S: delete unused code Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53E8A98A020000780002B059@mail.emea.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®